Quote:
Originally Posted by Stenar
The Zephyr???
|
While as much as I would like to state an answer, by stating yes or no to the location would be in itself me stating the location.
I think we will hear more about this in the coming weeks.
As the deal is primarily with the acquisition of the properties, once the properties are acquired, I would be happy to state the location here.
I did look at the following:
http://slco.org/assessor/new/javaapi2/parcelviewext.cfm?parcel_ID=&query=Y
And the parcels still aren't showing as being owned by the same party.
Once they are, I think the information would be okay to release. UTPlanner may know better though and I would be okay to go by their judgement on this as there may be extenuating circumstances that I don't know about and wasn't relayed to me.