HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #381  
Old Posted Oct 15, 2015, 5:28 AM
red-paladin red-paladin is offline
Vancouver Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 3,626
They should sell this site and build two other buildings in other places.

If someone creates a summary chart of the 14 projects, their location, completed photos, etc, I'll buy them a case of beer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #382  
Old Posted Oct 15, 2015, 5:56 AM
Sprawl Sprawl is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 84
Wow. Banking that Coal Harbour site for social is certifiably insane.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #383  
Old Posted Oct 15, 2015, 7:21 AM
misinger misinger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 2
I don't understand the logic with spreading out social housing, especially in very expensive market price zones which could be sold to provide even more social housing.

Why not build out a bunch of units in DTES / East Vancouver where land values are much cheaper, and then also build centralized mental health centres (a bit of that coming with the new St Pauls hospital).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #384  
Old Posted Oct 15, 2015, 12:06 PM
Sprawl Sprawl is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 84
Quote:
Originally Posted by misinger View Post
I don't understand the logic with spreading out social housing, especially in very expensive market price zones which could be sold to provide even more social housing.

Why not build out a bunch of units in DTES / East Vancouver where land values are much cheaper, and then also build centralized mental health centres (a bit of that coming with the new St Pauls hospital).
Because it would ghettoise the poor and mentally ill in total ignorance of the lessons learnt from the last 50 years of social housing projects. Or is this satire?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #385  
Old Posted Oct 15, 2015, 2:54 PM
osirisboy's Avatar
osirisboy osirisboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,429
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sprawl View Post
Because it would ghettoise the poor and mentally ill in total ignorance of the lessons learnt from the last 50 years of social housing projects. Or is this satire?
Yes that's for sure! That's why it should be spread out in areas that are cheaper such as outside of vancouver. I think vancouver has built its fair share of units. Building them in places like yaletown and coal harbour is insane. If I was homeless I could careless if it was built in Coquitlam, for example. I would just be happy to have a roof over my head.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #386  
Old Posted Oct 15, 2015, 6:13 PM
Vin Vin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,736
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prometheus View Post
Now, we just need to wait to hear they have abandoned their totally asinine and fiscally criminal plan to build a welfare housing project on the last remaining waterfront property in the heart of Coal Harbour (probably worth +$100 million).

Put a 50 storey hotel there, for heaven's sake.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #387  
Old Posted Oct 15, 2015, 6:17 PM
osirisboy's Avatar
osirisboy osirisboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,429
Yea zone it for that. Sell it off to a developer. Take the pile of cash from that sale and build a crap load of social units in the burbs and finally start to get people off the street and into housing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #388  
Old Posted Oct 15, 2015, 6:36 PM
Prometheus's Avatar
Prometheus Prometheus is offline
Reason and Freedom
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Vancouver/Toronto
Posts: 4,016
When you consider some of the locations, it looks as if the city is more intent on waging some kind of class war against the wealthy than guided by an alleged desire to help as many of the poor as it possibly can.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #389  
Old Posted Oct 15, 2015, 7:13 PM
SFUVancouver's Avatar
SFUVancouver SFUVancouver is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 6,694
In the Coal Harbour Official Development Plan the site in question is reserved for the planned/future Coal Harbour elementary school, and not social housing to the best of my understanding. It was always the intention of the Coal Harbour ODP to have the future elementary school and the community centre co-locate. The rooftop green roof and playground were designed to be used by the kiddos during the day and the general public outside of school hours and on weekends, not unlike Elsie Roy Elementary in Yaletown. Perhaps a combination school and non-market housing building was imagined?


Source: http://former.vancouver.ca/commsvcs/BYLAWS/odp/ch.pdf


Source: http://former.vancouver.ca/commsvcs/BYLAWS/odp/ch.pdf

Quote:
Originally Posted by Prometheus View Post
This site:



The three sites in Coal Harbour for non-market housing have already been built out: the Coal Harbour Housing Co-Op, PAL Co-Op, and C-Side.
__________________
VANCOUVER | Beautiful, Multicultural | Canada's Pacific Metropolis

Last edited by SFUVancouver; Oct 15, 2015 at 7:38 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #390  
Old Posted Oct 15, 2015, 7:23 PM
osirisboy's Avatar
osirisboy osirisboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,429
Is putting a school there really make the best economical sense? we always hear about budget shortfalls and never enough funding etc. these sorts of projects just don't seem to make sense to me given all these budget constraints and deficits
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #391  
Old Posted Oct 15, 2015, 7:42 PM
Prometheus's Avatar
Prometheus Prometheus is offline
Reason and Freedom
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Vancouver/Toronto
Posts: 4,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by SFUVancouver View Post

In the Coal Harbour Official Development Plan the site in question is reserved for the planned/future Coal Harbour elementary school, and not social housing.
Not according to Jim Meschino, VSB director of facilities:

Quote:
Class Notes: VSB settles with reluctant strata
International Village school construction begins in May

Cheryl Rossi / Vancouver Courier
February 5, 2015 02:34 PM

The Vancouver School Board hopes to start constructing an elementary school at International Village in May, a year later than planned.

The board had hoped to see the new kindergarten to Grade 7 school open December 2015. Now it’s aiming for December 2016.

Foundations for the school need to be built through the parkade at the Firenze condo tower at the corner of Abbott Street and Expo Boulevard. Jim Meschino, VSB director of facilities, says this was included on the land title.

“It just became something that people either forgot or didn’t want to acknowledge,” Meschino said.

Firenze was completed in 2007.

The VSB filed a petition in B.C. Supreme Court as a last resort after months of failing to gain access to the parkade. The board wanted to maintain an amicable relationship with the future school’s neighbours.

The board settled with the strata before their court date, Jan. 13.

....

The VSB secured parking with 24-hour security across the street for six months for the stalls that will be affected.

Those unconcerned with parking will receive a “token amount” of money per month instead. Residents will also be permitted to rent out VSB parking stalls earlier in the day than stated on the land title.

Meschino says residents of Firenze were concerned construction of a school adjacent to their tower would negatively affect their land values.

The VSB is working with the city on the proposed site for an elementary school in Coal Harbour. Another elementary school is meant to be built in Southeast False Creek.

“The land that’s right beside the Coal Harbour Community Centre, right at the foot of Broughton, is designated for a school, a 69-seat childcare and five floors of non-market housing,” Meschino said. “The city has never been able to move forward on the childcare and the housing because the school occupies the base.”

http://www.vancourier.com/news/class-not...nt-strata-1.1754178#sthash.a2ZPd6hT.dpuf
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #392  
Old Posted Oct 15, 2015, 8:44 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,628
Thanks for the detail, however this:

Quote:
“The city has never been able to move forward on the childcare and the housing because the school occupies the base.”
is that I'd call an insufficient reason. The city governs all of those aspects, so what's the holdup?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #393  
Old Posted Oct 15, 2015, 8:58 PM
Prometheus's Avatar
Prometheus Prometheus is offline
Reason and Freedom
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Vancouver/Toronto
Posts: 4,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarrenC12 View Post

is that I'd call an insufficient reason. The city governs all of those aspects, so what's the holdup?
The province funds public education, not the city. So, I imagine that the hold-up is that the VSB is waiting for funds from the province. Once that is secured, then it's social housing time in Coal Harbour.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #394  
Old Posted Oct 15, 2015, 9:13 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,628
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prometheus View Post
The province funds public education, not the city. So, I imagine that the hold-up is that the VSB is waiting for funds from the province. Once that is secured, then it's social housing time in Coal Harbour.
I'm not sure that's the problem. The VSB pays directly for school construction and operation, IIRC. The province gives funding relative to population.

A recent story has the province wanting to close empty spaces and the VSB saying no. They have big budgets and significant control over the land and buildings.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #395  
Old Posted Oct 16, 2015, 1:44 AM
Prometheus's Avatar
Prometheus Prometheus is offline
Reason and Freedom
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Vancouver/Toronto
Posts: 4,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarrenC12 View Post

The VSB pays directly for school construction and operation, IIRC.
I don't think so.

Quote:
School board borrows $1.6 million from BMO to fund downtown school construction


By Matthew Robinson, Vancouver Sun May 30, 2015


The Vancouver school board has taken out a $1.6-million loan from BMO to help the province fund a new elementary school in downtown Vancouver.

Funding new schools is a provincial responsibility, but when Victoria balked this year at covering unexpected additional costs for the project, the board decided to use its own operating dollars to get the school built...

The education ministry had earmarked about $13.5 million in 2012 for the 510-student school at International Village at Abbott Street and Expo Boulevard. But the price tag had climbed to $17 million by 2014 because of design changes and other expenses, and the shortfall was funded by the school board’s capital reserves after Victoria refused to cover the increase....

Vision Vancouver school trustee Patti Bacchus said it was the first time she could recall a board using operating funds to help the province build a school.

Full story: http://www.vancouversun.com/news/story.html?id=11094719

Last edited by Prometheus; Oct 16, 2015 at 3:29 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #396  
Old Posted Oct 16, 2015, 10:08 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,705
There are also 2 Concord sites behind Cooper's Park fronting Pacific Blvd.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #397  
Old Posted Oct 16, 2015, 11:45 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,628
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prometheus View Post
I don't think so.
Interesting. So the BC Liberals are holding the COV over a barrel.

Without much detail it's hard to say where the blame is on the overage, but making one government institution borrow money from private banks instead of another level of government is stupid.

Meanwhile they are recommending closing under-utilized schools and the VSB is balking. It's really an inefficient shit-show, with the taxpayer footing the bill.

I don't have much hope for the planned OV or CH schools at this rate.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #398  
Old Posted Oct 17, 2015, 12:58 AM
osirisboy's Avatar
osirisboy osirisboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,429
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
There are also 2 Concord sites behind Cooper's Park fronting Pacific Blvd.
That's two sites?? I thought it was just one. That is an eyesore, well I guess they all are. What's the city think about them? Have they made any push to get these developed in some way?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #399  
Old Posted Oct 17, 2015, 1:11 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,705
I noticed it on the 89 Nelson site map - and it shows 2 building there.
I posted it in the streetcar thread.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #400  
Old Posted Oct 18, 2015, 2:31 AM
casper's Avatar
casper casper is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Victoria
Posts: 12,853
I don't understand why the school board just does not go a developer and say. We need the bottom three stores for a school. You can build a 20 story condo tower on top of the school if you build the shell of the school and sign it over to us for a $1.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:13 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.