Quote:
Originally Posted by PHXFlyer11
"Nope" what? You are defining density by building footprint. If you look at by # of residents for the lot size the numbers should be very similar since Jefferson has more units, fewer beds, while Onyx has fewer units, more beds.
If you are looking at number of residents vs building footprint, I'd argue you are still wrong because the footprint of Onyx is smaller (just as you stated) with just as many if not more residents.
|
My mistake--I didn't know that Onyx's number of beds was known, when it's in the damn doc I linked (i didn't think they'd have onyx's site plans in there and all that)
But that also implies that Onyx's bedrooms would've been full of people, which I doubt. I don't see a married couple with a child buying a two bedroom in Onyx, I would have more seen empty nesters wanting room to entertain, or rich single professionals wanting an office.
Then you have units that take time to sell while they're vacant, and still more units that are perpetually empty as second-homes or are owned by rich Chinese/foreign investors that don't even care about the rental income like you see all the time in SF, and the occasional corporate owner that has their visiting employee stay there for a bit but not full-time.
And I maintain that you're more likely to see Jefferson residents wandering around Mill getting drunk or otherwise supporting local business than you would Onyx residents. Condos like that are good for "lock and leave."
Prev
Linear Mode
