HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


View Poll Results: How Will You Vote On Election Day?
Conservative 50 21.65%
Liberal 117 50.65%
NDP 46 19.91%
Green 9 3.90%
BQ 6 2.60%
Other 3 1.30%
Voters: 231. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1321  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2015, 6:55 AM
Migs Migs is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Regina, Sk, Canada
Posts: 3,774
One of the most respected military men in all of NATO, General Rick Hillier posted this on Facebook about Monday debate.

"Mulcair , in my view, has not come come across well. His strategy really appears false and he does not even seem to believe it himself. Trudeau came across very strongly : until he talked about convicted terrorists - those who plan to or do attack Canada, after obtaining citizenship - should keep their citizenship and he appears delighted to be say he's canceling the F-35 and putting savings to the navy. That is overtly false and there will be no savings unless we ask the U.S. to do our air defence. Harper smartly let each of the other two slaughter each other - good tactics!!!"
     
     
  #1322  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2015, 7:19 AM
Bcasey25raptor's Avatar
Bcasey25raptor Bcasey25raptor is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Vancouver Suburbs
Posts: 2,886
How many elections must the Tories win for you to call them the Natural Governing Party?

They've been in power for 40% of my life and most of the 21st century.
__________________
River District Big Government progressive
~ Just Watch me
- Pierre Elliot Trudeau
     
     
  #1323  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2015, 8:06 AM
Nathan's Avatar
Nathan Nathan is offline
Hmm....
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Regina
Posts: 3,505
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bcasey25raptor View Post
How many elections must the Tories win for you to call them the Natural Governing Party?

They've been in power for 40% of my life and most of the 21st century.
Probably more than the current stretch... by quite a bit. They've been in power for much of my life too, but we are quite young compared to Canada.



1900 seems to have been a turning point where the Liberals would often be in power for upwards of 10-20 years, followed by a stint with a conservative party for what seems to be a maximum 10 years - basically what the Conservatives are starting to fight through now.

Something to also consider... The Liberals have basically always been there. They have shifted along the spectrum from time to time, but as a party they are still there. Conservative parties have been a lot more fluid: Conservative, Progressive Conservative, Canadian Alliance, Reform, etc.
     
     
  #1324  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2015, 1:11 PM
Stingray2004's Avatar
Stingray2004 Stingray2004 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: White Rock, BC (Metro Vancouver)
Posts: 3,145
     
     
  #1325  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2015, 1:35 PM
Aylmer's Avatar
Aylmer Aylmer is offline
Still optimistic
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Montreal (C-D-N) / Ottawa (Aylmer)
Posts: 5,407
A few more days of this and I expect that we'll see ABC movement towards the Liberals. As of yet, it doesn't seem to be happening in Quebec yet, but I think that if/when we start to see the LPC gaining there, it'll be a difficult trend to reverse.

But three weeks is still a long time...
__________________
I've always struggled with reality. And I'm pleased to say that I won.
     
     
  #1326  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2015, 1:51 PM
O-tacular's Avatar
O-tacular O-tacular is offline
Fake News
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 26,250
Quote:
Originally Posted by shreddog View Post
Nope - NWPA or NPA only relate to impacting navigation, it is NOT a catalyst for other studies. Claims have to be made against the relevant act. NWPA/NPA was used as a potential roadblock primarily based on clauses 20 and 23 - which have NO environmental impact.
Then why the concern at all? If all it protects is canoes how come every single environmental group in the country opposes it getting axed?
     
     
  #1327  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2015, 2:35 PM
Migs Migs is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Regina, Sk, Canada
Posts: 3,774
Economy’s bounce back from recession bigger than expected

http://globalnews.ca/news/2249519/canada...tPostID=220b5a9d29e43d498bf4b667e6df0937
     
     
  #1328  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2015, 2:48 PM
travis3000's Avatar
travis3000 travis3000 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Simcoe County, ON
Posts: 6,506
I wonder why EKOS has the Conservatives in such a strong lead compared to the other pollsters. Nanos has had the Liberals and Cons in a tie for the past two weeks, and show Liberals leading in Ontario. And NANOS is very reputable. If they've polled 7000 people then you have to seriously look at their results and wonder what's going on.
     
     
  #1329  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2015, 2:49 PM
Acajack's Avatar
Acajack Acajack is offline
Gros Méchant Loup
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: SSP Graveyard
Posts: 72,949
Remember that Australia guy the Tories hired as a strategist? Lynton "Dead Cat" Crosby?

Enter the niqab!
__________________
Gone... but never forgotten.
     
     
  #1330  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2015, 2:52 PM
kiwi's Avatar
kiwi kiwi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 197
Quote:
Originally Posted by Migs View Post
Economy’s bounce back from recession bigger than expected

http://globalnews.ca/news/2249519/canada...tPostID=220b5a9d29e43d498bf4b667e6df0937
Pam Am Games were in July I bet those games played a huge part in those numbers.
__________________
TrudeauMetre

https://www.trudeaumetre.ca/
     
     
  #1331  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2015, 2:52 PM
DizzyEdge's Avatar
DizzyEdge DizzyEdge is offline
My Spoon Is Too Big
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
Posts: 9,162
Quote:
Originally Posted by Migs View Post
One of the most respected military men in all of NATO, General Rick Hillier posted this on Facebook about Monday debate.

"Mulcair , in my view, has not come come across well. His strategy really appears false and he does not even seem to believe it himself. Trudeau came across very strongly : until he talked about convicted terrorists - those who plan to or do attack Canada, after obtaining citizenship - should keep their citizenship and he appears delighted to be say he's canceling the F-35 and putting savings to the navy. That is overtly false and there will be no savings unless we ask the U.S. to do our air defence. Harper smartly let each of the other two slaughter each other - good tactics!!!"
That doesn't make sense, the point of cancelling the F-35 is to buy something cheaper, not to buy nothing.
__________________
Concerned about protecting Calgary's built heritage?
www.CalgaryHeritage.org
News - Heritage Watch - Forums
     
     
  #1332  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2015, 3:02 PM
suburbia suburbia is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 6,271
I don't know how many of you have had a chance to listen to the most recent ICC LaFontaine-Baldwin Lecture. Calgary's Mayor Naheed Nenshi delivered an exceptional speech about the Canada we want. While I thought it couldn't get any better, last evening's CBC Ideas podcast had snips of the lecture with comments from John R Saul, and then an interview with Nenshi. This is really a must listen item for anyone serious about participating the elections.

Tuesday September 29, 2015
Doing the Right Thing
http://www.cbc.ca/radio/ideas/doing-the-right-thing-1.3247353
     
     
  #1333  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2015, 3:06 PM
MonctonRad's Avatar
MonctonRad MonctonRad is online now
Wildcats Rule!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Moncton NB
Posts: 41,318


I heard him. He's a very powerful speaker and seems like a genuine person who believes what he says. I wonder if he has any federal ambitions?
__________________
Go 'Cats Go
     
     
  #1334  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2015, 3:08 PM
suburbia suburbia is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 6,271
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stingray2004 View Post
That's an interesting document. I found the stats about people's second choice particularly fascinating. Most cons have the libs as their second choice. Most libs have the cons as their second choice. Most ndps have the libs as their second choice. No one has the ndp as their second choice, and of all the three, the libs have the most second choice voters of all the other parties. That tells me that the NDP are near their ceiling. The cons are closing on their ceiling, but have some room for growth. But the liberals, of the three, have the most room to grow, and from both sides of the political spectrum. The recent momentum seems to align with this conclusion. If you are for change, your best choice really does seem to be the liberals.
     
     
  #1335  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2015, 3:11 PM
suburbia suburbia is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 6,271
Quote:
Originally Posted by MonctonRad View Post


I heard him. He's a very powerful speaker and seems like a genuine person who believes what he says. I wonder if he has any federal ambitions?
He has never expressed any, but he certainly isn't shy of expressing views regarding provincial or federal arenas. I suspect he has indeed thought about this a whole lot, but one consideration for him has always been that he can't express interest in other roles while he is a sitting city mayor.
     
     
  #1336  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2015, 3:25 PM
VANRIDERFAN's Avatar
VANRIDERFAN VANRIDERFAN is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Regina
Posts: 5,487
Quote:
Originally Posted by DizzyEdge View Post
That doesn't make sense, the point of cancelling the F-35 is to buy something cheaper, not to buy nothing.
There is really nothing out there that can do the job and is a huge savings in cost.
I favour the Super Hornet, but it too is an expensive bird (it is a very extensive upgrade from our current CF18)
     
     
  #1337  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2015, 3:25 PM
Nouvellecosse's Avatar
Nouvellecosse Nouvellecosse is offline
Volatile Pacivist
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 11,366
Quote:
Originally Posted by MonctonRad View Post


I heard him. He's a very powerful speaker and seems like a genuine person who believes what he says. I wonder if he has any federal ambitions?
What was your take on the actual content of the speech?
__________________
"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man." - George Bernard Shaw
Don't ask people not to debate a topic. Just stop making debatable assertions. Problem solved.
     
     
  #1338  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2015, 3:27 PM
Nouvellecosse's Avatar
Nouvellecosse Nouvellecosse is offline
Volatile Pacivist
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 11,366
Quote:
Originally Posted by VANRIDERFAN View Post
There is really nothing out there that can do the job and is a huge savings in cost.
I favour the Super Hornet, but it too is an expensive bird (it is a very extensive upgrade from our current CF18)
If we're going to have to spend that much money anyway, maybe we should develop a new avro arrow!
__________________
"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man." - George Bernard Shaw
Don't ask people not to debate a topic. Just stop making debatable assertions. Problem solved.
     
     
  #1339  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2015, 4:29 PM
VANRIDERFAN's Avatar
VANRIDERFAN VANRIDERFAN is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Regina
Posts: 5,487
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nouvellecosse View Post
If we're going to have to spend that much money anyway, maybe we should develop a new avro arrow!
Oh for 🞵🞵🞵🞵 sakes. That idea flew into the sunset half a century ago.
     
     
  #1340  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2015, 4:49 PM
wg_flamip wg_flamip is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Toronto
Posts: 878
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stingray2004 View Post
True. However Hudak would not have flown in either BC, AB, SK, or MB either in my honest opinion. His quasi-radical platform spooked too many people in ON and would have done same thing here. Certainly not old school ON PC such as Bill Davis.

And the Reform Party was also perceived suspiciously in ON, back in the 1990`s, as some unknown western-based, right-wing political animal invading their (centrist, red tory) territory. IMHO.

Even then, apparently quite a few 1990`s seat races in ON resulted in the Reform and PCs splitting the vote allowing the Liberals to sneak up the middle.

Seems to have all changed with the Conservative party becoming or perceived to be more `mainstream`, over the past decade, with many voting segments in ON IMHO.

In any event, am quite certain that ON`s 905-belt will decide this year`s election outcome.
Yep, I was a kid at the time, but I remember Reform was kind of seen as a party of Bible-thumping racists - at least by most of the adults I would've been surrounded by at the time. You rarely saw Reform signs on people's lawns (or anywhere else for that matter). They were, for us in the GTA, only a fringe party and not a serious option. The Liberals were also benefiting from a weakened NDP that few were taking seriously either. Even "safe" NDP seats in Toronto and Hamilton were voting overwhelmingly Liberal through much of the 90s and early 2000s.

When we compare election results over time, I think we sometimes forget that the population itself is far from static. A substantial chunk of the people voting during the Chretien/Martin years are, well, dead. And a substantial number of voters today were ineligible to vote at the time, either because they were too young or because they weren't citizens yet. On top of that you have hundreds of thousands - if not millions - who've moved since then. I'd be very interested to see the rate of voter turnover in ridings across the country. I'd imagine that those rates would be especially high in and around our major cities.

My riding, for example, was once one of the safest Liberal seats in the country, but their vote share has been decreasing for the past 10-15 years and it went solidly NDP the last time around. I don't think that's because individual voters have shifted left en masse (though certainly some have) - older die hard Liberals have been dying off, their children having been moving to the suburbs, new immigrants have moved in and gentrification has brought in a more traditionally lefty crowd.

All of that aside, one of the Conservative's greatest successes since the right united has been their ability to break the Liberal hold on the immigrant vote (the NDP have also had success on this front, and even the Bloc was making inroads). Conservative strongholds in the West have become much more diverse places over the past decades. I think the Liberals were hoping that that would make them more competitive out there, but the reverse has happened. The Conservatives have been able to present a more diverse face to the GTA thanks in no small part to a more diverse base in Calgary, Edmonton, &c. It would be much more difficult today to suggest they're a bunch of closet white supremacists.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:32 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.