HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #3081  
Old Posted Aug 25, 2015, 9:50 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,025
The Glazing, 'I'm Loving it'
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #3082  
Old Posted Aug 25, 2015, 10:14 PM
Oilkountry's Avatar
Oilkountry Oilkountry is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,868
That place is going to be spectacular
     
     
  #3083  
Old Posted Aug 25, 2015, 10:16 PM
Oilkountry's Avatar
Oilkountry Oilkountry is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,868
What tower is that? s that part of the arena district or was this pre planned?

     
     
  #3084  
Old Posted Aug 25, 2015, 10:19 PM
O-tacular's Avatar
O-tacular O-tacular is online now
Fake News
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 25,972


So jealous....
     
     
  #3085  
Old Posted Aug 25, 2015, 10:25 PM
Daveography's Avatar
Daveography Daveography is offline
Klatuu Barada Nikto
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The Island of Misfit Architecture
Posts: 4,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oilkountry View Post
What tower is that? s that part of the arena district or was this pre planned?
Ultima - started before arena, but was planned during the arena discussions I believe. In any case, it is not part of the arena / Ice District project itself.
     
     
  #3086  
Old Posted Aug 25, 2015, 10:32 PM
Oilkountry's Avatar
Oilkountry Oilkountry is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,868
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daveography View Post
Ultima - started before arena, but was planned during the arena discussions I believe. In any case, it is not part of the arena / Ice District project itself.
thanks that's quite the tower. Edmonton is seeing a ton of these projects

The symphony tower Is incredible I have looked at buying a condo in the building.

at the same time i was introduced to the fox towers and my personal favorite the pearl which I will most likely reside in the next 2 years
     
     
  #3087  
Old Posted Aug 26, 2015, 10:43 PM
Migs Migs is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Regina, Sk, Canada
Posts: 3,774
A couple drone views of the Regina stadium site.

https://instagram.com/p/63Bt7kMEiQ/

https://instagram.com/p/63BK_xMEhJ/
     
     
  #3088  
Old Posted Aug 26, 2015, 10:50 PM
Black Star Black Star is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 7,259
^ Looking Great
     
     
  #3089  
Old Posted Aug 26, 2015, 10:53 PM
SkydivePilot SkydivePilot is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: REGINA
Posts: 2,295
Quote:
Originally Posted by Migs View Post
A couple drone views of the Regina stadium site.

https://instagram.com/p/63Bt7kMEiQ/

https://instagram.com/p/63BK_xMEhJ/
Keep those videos coming; it's looking great!!!
     
     
  #3090  
Old Posted Aug 27, 2015, 12:14 AM
craner's Avatar
craner craner is offline
Go Tall or Go Home
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 7,380
Calgary should just build a copy of Edmonton's arena & Regina's stadium and save the design fees.
I would be thrilled - both are looking great.
     
     
  #3091  
Old Posted Aug 27, 2015, 2:34 PM
Oilkountry's Avatar
Oilkountry Oilkountry is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,868
Quote:
Originally Posted by craner View Post
Calgary should just build a copy of Edmonton's arena & Regina's stadium and save the design fees.
I would be thrilled - both are looking great.
The Canadian dream team.

I think Calgary Should look for a Videotron centre and an IGF for 570M

They were gonna throw 200M of their own money into the project anyway.
Bump you're original 250M ticket tax to 270M. Get the other 100M from the city from a CRL. Build them on the same location as the Saddledome to keep costs down. Calgary doesn't need a $900M project
They just need an Outdoor stadium close to the same capacity of IGF But honestly a fancier/bigger full wrap THF and a rink the equal quality to Videotron centre would do great in Calgary. If You built a scaled back Stadium that you could add to later (TD/THF) Your costs would continue to drop.

I have a feeling the 250M ticket tax is a big problem because they want the city to front that cash.
     
     
  #3092  
Old Posted Aug 27, 2015, 2:46 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,480
^ A THF clone would be a bit underwhelming for a western city... I hope Calgary aims a bit higher than that. Calgary should have a decent quality stadium.
     
     
  #3093  
Old Posted Aug 27, 2015, 3:08 PM
The Fisher Account's Avatar
The Fisher Account The Fisher Account is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Bridgeland - Calgary, AB
Posts: 1,023
After all the fuss, I'm fairly certain CalgaryNext will get built. Too much momentum behind the concept
__________________
Follow me on Twitter - @Fisher_Account for Calgary construction and development updates
     
     
  #3094  
Old Posted Aug 27, 2015, 3:17 PM
HomeInMyShoes's Avatar
HomeInMyShoes HomeInMyShoes is offline
arf
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: File 13
Posts: 14,625
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Fisher Account View Post
After all the fuss, I'm fairly certain CalgaryNext will get built. Too much momentum behind the concept
That's too bad. There's going to be so many trade-offs on both sides of the football/field house side for either to be really great. Calgary could do so much more with $200 million on the field house side of the whole equation.
__________________

-- “We heal each other with kindness, gentleness and respect.” -- Richard Wagamese
-- “Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, Nothing is going to get better. It's not.” -- Dr. Seuss
     
     
  #3095  
Old Posted Aug 27, 2015, 3:20 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,480
^ I don't get why Calgary is wedded to the idea of building a lame indoor stadium instead of a spectacular outdoor one for about the same pricetag. As has been pointed out before, the fieldhouse aspect of the stadium could easily be met with a far smaller and more modestly priced facility.
     
     
  #3096  
Old Posted Aug 27, 2015, 3:59 PM
elly63 elly63 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 9,783
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Fisher Account View Post
After all the fuss, I'm fairly certain CalgaryNext will get built. Too much momentum behind the concept
I think it will as well, I'm just wondering if KK knows that there are people who are disappointed with the stadium/fieldhouse setup. Externally I have no problem with it, but with no info to go on in these early days, we all are making assumptions about the interior and how "80's high school" the concept seems.

So either they are going to be doing some high tech stuff with the stands to make it intimate or hopefully they will be going back to the drawing board the next time a more specific proposal comes forth.

Again, I ask the Calgary folk, is it coming out publicly that this is a lame design (the interior) or is Joe Calgarian happy with it?
     
     
  #3097  
Old Posted Aug 27, 2015, 4:00 PM
Barnes's Avatar
Barnes Barnes is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 273
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oilkountry View Post
The Canadian dream team.

I think Calgary Should look for a Videotron centre and an IGF for 570M

They were gonna throw 200M of their own money into the project anyway.
Bump you're original 250M ticket tax to 270M. Get the other 100M from the city from a CRL. Build them on the same location as the Saddledome to keep costs down. Calgary doesn't need a $900M project
They just need an Outdoor stadium close to the same capacity of IGF But honestly a fancier/bigger full wrap THF and a rink the equal quality to Videotron centre would do great in Calgary. If You built a scaled back Stadium that you could add to later (TD/THF) Your costs would continue to drop.

I have a feeling the 250M ticket tax is a big problem because they want the city to front that cash.
You can't just get a CRL anywhere, this isn't Edmonton. There certainly isn't one available on the Stampede grounds nor is there space for two arenas and a stadium. Why would the Stampede allow someone to come in and take up a bunch of their land?

We don't know where the $250mm will come from, the Flames have not said. If they expect the City to upfront it there will be a massive backlash.
     
     
  #3098  
Old Posted Aug 27, 2015, 4:02 PM
king10 king10 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 2,776
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
^ i don't get why calgary is wedded to the idea of building a lame indoor stadium instead of a spectacular outdoor one for about the same pricetag. As has been pointed out before, the fieldhouse aspect of the stadium could easily be met with a far smaller and more modestly priced facility.
qft
     
     
  #3099  
Old Posted Aug 27, 2015, 4:03 PM
elly63 elly63 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 9,783
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
As has been pointed out before, the fieldhouse aspect of the stadium could easily be met with a far smaller and more modestly priced facility.
AFAIK the society that has been pushing for a new fieldhouse for years had that 200 million figure in mind so I figure they already priced out what they thought they needed. KK et al have jumped on the bandwagon and are trying to kill two birds with one stone, which is great but it has to be better executed.
     
     
  #3100  
Old Posted Aug 27, 2015, 4:14 PM
Barnes's Avatar
Barnes Barnes is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 273
Quote:
Originally Posted by elly63 View Post
I think it will as well, I'm just wondering if KK knows that there are people who are disappointed with the stadium/fieldhouse setup. Externally I have no problem with it, but with no info to go on in these early days, we all are making assumptions about the interior and how "80's high school" the concept seems.

So either they are going to be doing some high tech stuff with the stands to make it intimate or hopefully they will,be going back to the drawing board the next time a more specific proposal comes forth.

Again, I ask the Calgary folk, is it coming out publicly that this is a lame design (the interior) or is Joe Calgarian happy with it?
I would say no. Most people are keeping a somewhat open mind as it is a concept but at the same time are questioning why this announcement could not have happened 2 years ago. If you were paying attention, other than the funding there was no new information presented.

At first everyone was caught up in the hype of announcement day and the excitement but now people are able to look critically at what is proposed and see it as a project that limits itself by trying to couple itself to some long term City objectives.

There has been a lot of discussion regarding the CoC taking ownership of the arena and other facilities. Kent Wilson from Flames Nation put it best with this analogy... that it's like a friend coming to you and asking to buy her a car so that she can become an Uber driver. You'll be the owner of the car but she'll take care of it and keep all the profits. At the end you get the car back when she's done with it. Arenas are a lot harder to sell then cars though.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:44 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.