Quote:
Originally Posted by corey
I said the DESIGN is not even worth commenting on. It's great the hospital is expanding onto that property. I also said I don't care that it isn't anything great. But I would expect a prestigious firm like Davis Partnership to come up with something a hell of a lot better. Way to cherry pick other people's comments.
|
What would you expect them to come up with exactly? Budget for design elements that stand out from thin air (do you, for example, think the sculpture of the mother holding the baby was a gift from the architectural firm who designed the maternity wing it decorates)? Or were they asked by their client possibly, maybe, to build something that maximized the usable area of the building while keeping with the general theme of all other buildings Denver Health has built in the last 2 decades? Could they have possibly, maybe been asked to do that as a competent architectural firm? Just maybe?
It's not going to be stick (likely given it's height), it's likely going to be clad in brick (if it does follow the lead of other DH buildings), it DOES fit with all the other buildings the hospital has been making for the last many years, there's no surface parking, the entrance to the garage is on the side street, and not all that big, they've even slightly broken up the facade along the long length of the building. It continues new height that has been being added to Broadway recently. Hell it hits nearly every erogenous zone of the teachers I had in Architecture school. We could even imagine a soft sigh, stroke of the beard and thoughtful nod while we all contemplate how much of an intelligent statement the building makes by NOT making too much of a statement.
And while we're on cherry picking, way to not defend cheerleading the stealing of money from private citizens through 'historic by contract' BS.