Posted Aug 17, 2015, 7:13 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,017
|
|
So the ruling was that the Canadian government had to (has to) consult with the affected first nations? I'm a little confused as to what that means. Is that just another way of saying that the land would be theirs, or is it a matter of financially compensating them or what?
|