HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture


    The Brooklyn Tower in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • New York Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location
New York Projects & Construction Forum

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #81  
Old Posted Aug 5, 2015, 8:46 PM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Great State of NJ
Posts: 49,386
A rendering of the tower that could rise at the site of The Dime Savings Bank of New York in downtown Brooklyn.


Credit: http://www.crainsnewyork.com/article/20150805/REAL_ESTATE/150809951
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #82  
Old Posted Aug 5, 2015, 8:50 PM
vandelay vandelay is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 872
With a supertall going up in Jersey City, 1WTC, and this the view of NYC from the harbor will be quite harmonious.
__________________
Let's keep it real because I'm keeping it real!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #83  
Old Posted Aug 5, 2015, 8:56 PM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Great State of NJ
Posts: 49,386
Quote:
Originally Posted by vandelay View Post
With a supertall going up in Jersey City, 1WTC, and this the view of NYC from the harbor will be quite harmonious.
I always wanted NYC to have a Hong Kong like feel to it, and with supertalls on numerous flanks of the harbor, its become a reality.

The direction the city is going with supertalls is on the right track. There placement also happens to be aesthetically pleasing too.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #84  
Old Posted Aug 5, 2015, 9:02 PM
Hudson11's Avatar
Hudson11 Hudson11 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,174
Brooklyn's skyline is already respectable as viewed from the harbor. After its current boom, it might just be able to boast being one of the USA's top ten. Manhattan, Chicago, San Francisco, Miami, Seattle, LA, Houston, Philly, Boston and Atlanta are what pop into mind first. But this beast is also waking:


FDNY by roger reyes, on Flickr
__________________
click here too see hunser's list of the many supertall skyscrapers of New York City!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #85  
Old Posted Aug 5, 2015, 9:26 PM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Great State of NJ
Posts: 49,386
I agree. I think its nice that taller structures are appearing outside of Manhattan. I kinda like that. Gives even more bulk to a already massive skyline. I'm just waiting for the boom to really revitalize Newark. There's some activity going on there, but not on the level of JC, and I'd like to see even more skyscrapers in NJ largest city. Honorable mentions to LIC as well which will look like DoBro in a few years as construction signs litter the area.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #86  
Old Posted Aug 5, 2015, 9:41 PM
Hudson11's Avatar
Hudson11 Hudson11 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,174
__________________
click here too see hunser's list of the many supertall skyscrapers of New York City!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #87  
Old Posted Aug 5, 2015, 9:42 PM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Great State of NJ
Posts: 49,386
Possibility of 1000-1200 feet is a tease. Although this sounds like a recipe for fierce NIMBY opposition. In the end though, a potential such as this could be a catalyst for other such towers essentially making DoBro an extension of Lower Manhattan. With lots of space, lots of potential.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #88  
Old Posted Aug 6, 2015, 12:09 AM
Crawford Crawford is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NYC/Polanco, DF
Posts: 34,885
Quote:
Originally Posted by chris08876 View Post
Although this sounds like a recipe for fierce NIMBY opposition.
There's no one really living around this general area. I doubt there would be any NIMBY opposition. NIMBYs don't really care about areas where they don't live.

And the tower is as-of-right, so it doesn't matter. The developer can built as tall as he wants.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #89  
Old Posted Aug 6, 2015, 12:16 AM
Roadcruiser1's Avatar
Roadcruiser1 Roadcruiser1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: New York City
Posts: 2,117
Quote:
Originally Posted by chris08876 View Post
Possibility of 1000-1200 feet is a tease. Although this sounds like a recipe for fierce NIMBY opposition. In the end though, a potential such as this could be a catalyst for other such towers essentially making DoBro an extension of Lower Manhattan. With lots of space, lots of potential.
This building is good to go. Most of this area is commercial which means zero complaints. .
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #90  
Old Posted Aug 6, 2015, 1:36 AM
Hypothalamus's Avatar
Hypothalamus Hypothalamus is offline
Homo sapiens sapiens
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: 3rd planet from the Sun
Posts: 1,665
Just for people new to the project, the site of the likely supertall is 340 Flatbush Avenue Extension and not the Junior's bakery property at 386 Flatbush. Some posts should probably be moved over there since Junior's has stated they are not selling their property anytime soon (as far as we know) (or just combine the threads as the discussion is not necessarily off topic).
__________________
“If I have done the public any service, it is due to my patient thought.” ― Isaac Newton

~ My Stamford, CT Thread ~~ My Danbury, CT Thread ~
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #91  
Old Posted Aug 6, 2015, 12:53 PM
Crawford Crawford is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NYC/Polanco, DF
Posts: 34,885
Quote from today's NY Post-

“The juxtaposition of a historic landmarked building with a modern tower that will be symbolically over 1,000 feet tall will be incredible,” the source added.

The tower will house luxury condos along with a “cool retail” component, source said.

http://nypost.com/2015/08/06/developers-look-to-build-empire-state-building-of-brooklyn/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #92  
Old Posted Aug 6, 2015, 1:41 PM
TonyNYC TonyNYC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: New York
Posts: 212
Brooklyn getting a 1,000FT + and LIC getting a 915FT Tower at Queens Plaza.. Signature supertall and almost supertall in the outer boros. If you haven;t noticed over the last 5-10 years..It's not just Manhattan..the waterfront from Long Island City down to below the Brooklyn Bridge has had some much construction already and has dozens of new big projects in the works!

This NYC construction boom is just insanely AWESOME!!!

Last edited by TonyNYC; Aug 6, 2015 at 1:53 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #93  
Old Posted Aug 6, 2015, 3:26 PM
Gantz Gantz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 778
Quote:
Originally Posted by chris08876 View Post
A rendering of the tower that could rise at the site of The Dime Savings Bank of New York in downtown Brooklyn.
Chris, you are posting the news in the wrong thread.

This is the thread for this project:
http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=212048
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #94  
Old Posted Aug 6, 2015, 5:33 PM
Hamilton Hamilton is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Journal Square
Posts: 449
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crawford View Post
There's no one really living around this general area. I doubt there would be any NIMBY opposition. NIMBYs don't really care about areas where they don't live.

And the tower is as-of-right, so it doesn't matter. The developer can built as tall as he wants.
Never underestimate NYC's NIMBYs. Remember Hudson Yards? Nobody lived there, either. Hudson Yards was supposed to have unlimited FAR, but this was nixed because of NIMBYs.

That said, I do think that since this site is as-of-right, the NIMBYs will cry but nothing will come of their complaints.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #95  
Old Posted Aug 7, 2015, 4:47 AM
NYRebel NYRebel is offline
aka Studdedleather
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: New York City
Posts: 185
http://www.crainsnewyork.com/article/20150805/REAL_ESTATE/150809951

Brooklyn may soon get a tower nearly as tall as the Empire State Building

Quote:
Brooklyn could soon have a residential skyscraper as tall as the Empire State Building.

Developer Michael Stern, the builder of one of the tallest luxury condo towers on Manhattan's Billionaires' Row, and real estate developer Joe Chetrit have struck a $90 million deal to acquire the former Dime Savings Bank of New York, located adjacent to the famed restaurant Junior's in downtown Brooklyn.

The bank at 9 Dekalb Ave. is a 150-year-old landmarked Neo-Roman building with a domed roof and an ornate interior. But perhaps more important than the building, which could become a prime retail location for an upscale brand like Apple, are the development rights that come with it: roughly 300,000-square-feet.

Mr. Stern could use them to build a tower next door at 340 Flatbush Avenue Extension, a property he owns in partnership with Mr. Chetrit. Combined with existing air rights, a nearly 600,000-square-foot tower could rise there.

No building has ever eclipsed 1,000 feet in any of the boroughs outside Manhattan and only a handful of towers have crossed that mark in Manhattan, though that list is growing. One source familiar with the deal suggested that Mr. Stern could build a tower potentially higher than the Empire State Building, whose spire stands at 1,454 feet. Only one other residential tower plans to soar that high, a 1,775-foot-tall building being developed by Extell Development, which is currently under construction in Manhattan on West 57th Street, known as Billionaires' Row.

A more likely outcome is a tower that is as tall as the Empire State Building itself, minus its antenna. That's a cool 1,250 feet. A source familiar with the deal said the tower will likely be between 1,000 feet and 1,200 feet tall.

According to published reports, the tallest tower in Brooklyn is 388 Bridge St. at 590 feet tall—half the size of what Mr. Stern may have planned for his site—followed by The Brooklyner, which is 514 feet tall.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #96  
Old Posted Aug 7, 2015, 4:51 AM
NYRebel NYRebel is offline
aka Studdedleather
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: New York City
Posts: 185
Also let's not forget right next door (adjacent to this site) we'll have City Point (Tower) 3. With EXTELL being the developer!!!

Two supertalls coming? Or just my wishful thinking? The Brooklyn skyline is about to be in the ranks after these two towers are unveiled! Exciting times for the borough and city skyline as a whole =)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #97  
Old Posted Aug 7, 2015, 5:29 AM
Fardeb Fardeb is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 100
^ Very exciting times for Brooklyn between this and City Point Phase 3.

If this thing actually turns out to be in the range they are talking about, Brooklyn is gonna need some stuff in the 700-900ft range to help bridge the gap between it and the current crop of 500-600ft towers currently popping up all over down there.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #98  
Old Posted Aug 7, 2015, 9:23 AM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Great State of NJ
Posts: 49,386
Exciting times. Its about time that the outer boroughs push into supertall territory. Stern, like Barnett, needs statues to commemorate his skyscraper efforts because he has the motivation to think big.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #99  
Old Posted Aug 7, 2015, 9:41 AM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Great State of NJ
Posts: 49,386
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #100  
Old Posted Aug 7, 2015, 3:05 PM
Vertical_Gotham's Avatar
Vertical_Gotham Vertical_Gotham is offline
N40° 46.8925', W073° 57.3
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 300
This would really be incredible. A tower with such a height would really expand NYC skyline and compliment Manhattan's perfectly.

I hope this is the beginning for more to come for Brooklyn! If Brooklyn was a city all by its lonesome self, it would be the 4th most populous city in the US of A. Brooklyn deserves this.
__________________
See my Hudson Yards Map
http://i.imgur.com/FVrYwpy.jpg
(Once in, Click image to enlarge)
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:27 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.