Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeNigh
The first two are NICE! If they don't want to use the whole lot for the third one then they should just partition out the rest and sell it.
|
Having front facing Spring Garden street parking is definitely a bummer. But there are both zoning and chicken-or-the-egg issues there. They're going to need a variance for residential use as the lot is zoned ICMX. While I'm not a fan of the zoning code's parking minimums for IRMX (the closest zoning designation to ICMX to allow multifamily) and CMX-3 (which neighboring properties are), the variance probably can't ignore the analogue parking requirements. And while a walkable mid-rise with no or limited parking makes a ton of sense for Spring Garden in general, it's not hard to see why you'd be attracting a fair amount of drivers here: despite the bird's eye closeness, this lot is pretty severely isolated: by the neighboring driver-oriented lots, by the Reading Viaduct to the north and west, by the mess of abandoned industrial uses to the south.
I do really wish they'd build on that NE portion of the lot facing Spring Garden, but all and all, given the problems with zoning and environs, this is really not a bad project at all.