HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive


125 Greenwich Street in the SkyscraperPage Database

• Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • New York Skyscraper Diagram

• Map Location
• New York Projects & Construction Forum

 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #501  
Old Posted Jun 15, 2015, 5:01 PM
fleonzo fleonzo is online now
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 913
NYYIMBY is listing it at 1,200 FT.....

Link:
http://www.yimbynews.com/2015/06/new-des...stricts-first-residential-supertall.html

Last September, YIMBY revealed a new design for 125 Greenwich Street, a supertall planned for the corner of Thames and Greenwich Streets, just across from the new World Trade Center. Now, we have updated images of the project, which has seen significant modifications since those images were released; nevertheless, the Rafael Viñoly-designed building will still stand well over 1,000 feet in height, and is set to become Manhattan’s tallest residential tower south of 57th Street.

The last time we checked in on the site, preliminary work appeared to be getting underway, and a zoning diagram had been pasted to the fencing. Unfortunately, as with many high-profile projects, the current new building applications appear to be “dummy” filings that will be amended at a later date.

They list the tower at 841 feet tall, with a floor area of approximately 450,000 square feet. While the building’s overall floor area may be accurate, the height figures are likely intentionally misleading, a tactic that is becoming increasingly common among the city’s high-profile projects, like 217 West 57th Street.

When YIMBY posted the renderings last fall, they came with specific height figures listing the tower at 1,356 feet. It appears that the new images show a slight reduction in height, though it will certainly stand far taller than the 841 feet listed on the applications; the new design appears to be approximately 1,200 feet tall, which will still put it well ahead of any other residential tower below 57th Street.
     
     
  #502  
Old Posted Jun 15, 2015, 5:23 PM
Zapatan Zapatan is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,852
~1200' is perfect, glad the design looks way better too
     
     
  #503  
Old Posted Jun 15, 2015, 9:16 PM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 49,413
     
     
  #504  
Old Posted Jun 15, 2015, 10:04 PM
UTEPman UTEPman is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 240
Top portion reminds me of Hampshire House

     
     
  #505  
Old Posted Jun 15, 2015, 10:14 PM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 49,413
I wonder if Shvo decided to add the top portion so that it wouldn't be a glassy version of 432? Well, either way, its unique, and an addition to the top, crown wise, was needed. Make it somewhat unique.

At about 1200 feet, its a solid addition. Eh, just another midrise in this super tall boom. Short might I say.

jk

We have this, 80 S. Street, and 40 Trinity as potential supertall candidates for the area. Add that to WTC3, and WTC2, and its another supertall construction node.

So if one is in Midtown, and needs supertall nirvana, head to HY or 57th Street. Taking the Path? Well, Lower has plenty of action. Soon, it will be DoBro and LIC. And... if one stops at JC, some action there too.
     
     
  #506  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2015, 1:35 AM
ILNY ILNY is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,748
Quote:
Originally Posted by chris08876 View Post
We have this, 80 S. Street, and 40 Trinity as potential supertall candidates for the area. Add that to WTC3, and WTC2, and its another supertall construction node.

So if one is in Midtown, and needs supertall nirvana, head to HY or 57th Street. Taking the Path? Well, Lower has plenty of action. Soon, it will be DoBro and LIC. And... if one stops at JC, some action there too.
In other words, we are entering the Age of Ramses.
     
     
  #507  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2015, 1:46 AM
JR Ewing JR Ewing is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 832
Quote:
Originally Posted by ILNY View Post
In other words, we are entering the Age of Ramses.

     
     
  #508  
Old Posted Jun 18, 2015, 12:40 AM
artspook's Avatar
artspook artspook is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 644
Put those four big Ramseses dolls on top of this supertall twig . . .
and I think we may have something really special here ! . . .
If they do a hampshire house roof -
they better not forget those chimneys.
     
     
  #509  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2015, 6:20 PM
alex1217 alex1217 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 29
Looks like construction is well under way. Stopped by this afternoon and peeked through the fencing, it looks like there's already steel columns piled into the ground. Heavy equipment seems to be piling on more columns. So I'm guessing this building won't have any basement floors?



     
     
  #510  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2015, 6:27 PM
Hudson11's Avatar
Hudson11 Hudson11 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,175
wow! thank for the update, alex.
     
     
  #511  
Old Posted Jun 27, 2015, 12:31 AM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 49,413
Could a mod move this to u/c. This beauty is good to go.
     
     
  #512  
Old Posted Jun 27, 2015, 12:21 PM
Vertical_Gotham's Avatar
Vertical_Gotham Vertical_Gotham is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 300
U/C already? great news.

I have to say, I've been really perplex with this project. The Shvomeister works in mysterious ways.
     
     
  #513  
Old Posted Jun 27, 2015, 11:46 PM
Crawford Crawford is online now
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 35,026
Well, the new design is certainly an improvement (though not sure if it's really a new design; the old one just looked like some basic schematic).
     
     
  #514  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2015, 3:19 AM
NYC GUY's Avatar
NYC GUY NYC GUY is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 575
Hopefully well get more detailed renderings. Judging by the most recent one it looks like it tapers a bit to the top unless it's just the rendering. Only next to 1WTC does a 1200' tower look tiny.
     
     
  #515  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2015, 9:22 AM
Hemeroscopium Hemeroscopium is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 86
Sounds like a joke!can we decently call this a rendering??
     
     
  #516  
Old Posted Jun 29, 2015, 8:09 PM
Zapatan Zapatan is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,852
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYC GUY View Post
Hopefully well get more detailed renderings. Judging by the most recent one it looks like it tapers a bit to the top unless it's just the rendering. Only next to 1WTC does a 1200' tower look tiny.
I think it's just the angle. In reality 1200 feet is about halfway up the mechanical band of 1WTC which isn't a whole lot shorter so it should be really dominant which is good. I think anything under the mechanical band (where the office height stops) would start to look small next to 1WTC.

But anyway a lot of buildings in the world could make a 1200 foot tower look pretty insignificant. Nordstrom would be the only one in NYC. Dwarfing a 350 + meter building is still quite a feat though
     
     
  #517  
Old Posted Jul 1, 2015, 11:58 PM
Pete8680's Avatar
Pete8680 Pete8680 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 221
2017?

So top out 2017?
     
     
  #518  
Old Posted Jul 2, 2015, 12:39 AM
ILNY ILNY is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,748
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete8680 View Post
So top out 2017?
Possible, but that will depend on how fast excavation/foundation work progresses which may take up 1-2 years for building of that height.
     
     
  #519  
Old Posted Jul 2, 2015, 1:35 AM
Vertical_Gotham's Avatar
Vertical_Gotham Vertical_Gotham is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 300
According to lower Manhattan's construction schedule as of June 2015.

The time frame for 125 Greenwich are as follows:

Excavation/Foundations > 2/2016
A) Drilling of Caissons > 9/2015

Superstructure > 3/2017
1st TCO > 11/2017
Completion > 6/2018

Sorry, I forgot where I found it, so no link. I just took a picture of the schedule on my phone when I discovered it.
     
     
  #520  
Old Posted Jul 3, 2015, 2:37 AM
TechTalkGuy's Avatar
TechTalkGuy TechTalkGuy is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,008
Nice slender tower!
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:45 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.