Quote:
Originally Posted by Canadian Mind
Prometheus, I'm pretty sure the tower height is what it is because of economics. Have you seen the inside of the building? The elevator core takes up around half of the lower floors. Any taller and the core would have been even bigger. <4000 square feet per floor is not really economical for a building who's largest usable space is around 8000 square feet. It is what it is, and I think it turned out good.
Now, start conceptualising replacement of the Guinness tower for something taller. I still think the step-up effect would be fantastic if a Guinness replacement is designed as tastefully as the MNP was.
|
Although some people would disagree, saying the Guinness Tower is an International Style heritage building and should thus remain; I agree with you.
The really tough part would be getting the right design for the taller replacement.
The design firm (preferably from Chicago, don't ask me why) would be challenged to come with a design pleasing to the vast majority, and super elegant, in and of itself.