HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > Portland > Parks, Metro, Urban Design & Heritage Issues


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #221  
Old Posted May 19, 2015, 1:28 AM
maccoinnich maccoinnich is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Portland
Posts: 8,115
City council is due to vote on increased SDCs on Wednesday.
__________________
"Maybe to an architect, they might look suspicious, but to me, they just look like rocks"

https://bsky.app/profile/maccoinnich.bsky.social
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #222  
Old Posted May 22, 2015, 8:12 PM
maccoinnich maccoinnich is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Portland
Posts: 8,115
OK, they're actually not voting on this until next week, but they did unanimously vote on an amendment that would delay implementation until next year:

Quote:
Why Portland is giving developers a reprieve on fee hikes



Portland homebuilders and developers will receive a yearlong reprieve in proposed fee hikes to pay for city parks.

The City Council on Wednesday unanimously agreed to postpone higher parks fees until July 2016, a full year beyond the original timetable. The proposal would double and in some cases nearly quadruple parks-related fees.

A final vote is set for May 27.

The increases, initially proposed by Commissioner Amanda Fritz, who oversees Portland Parks & Recreation, have come under fire from the business community and homebuilders.

...continues at the Oregonian.
__________________
"Maybe to an architect, they might look suspicious, but to me, they just look like rocks"

https://bsky.app/profile/maccoinnich.bsky.social
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #223  
Old Posted May 27, 2015, 11:45 PM
maccoinnich maccoinnich is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Portland
Posts: 8,115
Quote:
Portland OKs higher development fees for parks



A divided Portland City Council on Wednesday approved sharp increases in parks fees paid by developers.

The new rates will double and in some cases nearly quadruple current fees for business space. Rates will also grow for most medium- and all large-sized homes, and for any apartment or condo of at least 700 square feet.

Homebuilders and business groups have blasted the plan, which will increase development costs by thousands of dollars per project and will almost certainly be passed on to homebuyers, renters and commercial tenants.

The new rates, approved 3-2 on Wednesday, will go into effect July 1, 2016 – a year later than originally proposed.
...continues at the Oregonian.
__________________
"Maybe to an architect, they might look suspicious, but to me, they just look like rocks"

https://bsky.app/profile/maccoinnich.bsky.social
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #224  
Old Posted May 28, 2015, 5:52 AM
MarkDaMan's Avatar
MarkDaMan MarkDaMan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,587
Quote:
Originally Posted by maccoinnich View Post
Off topic, this is the stupidest photo. Every time it's on OLive, which is quite often, I get peeved. What the hell is with Fritz's small head?

On topic, with the passing of the levy, increase in annual budget and new development fees, they couldn't put something other than a parking lot on our newest park block? Absurd!
__________________
make paradise, tear up a parking lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #225  
Old Posted May 28, 2015, 6:27 AM
maccoinnich maccoinnich is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Portland
Posts: 8,115
Well, if we're going off topic my favorite photo of Fritz is this one...



...where she appears to be wearing the same Chanel suit that Marge Simpson did in 'Scenes from the Class Struggle in Springfield'.

__________________
"Maybe to an architect, they might look suspicious, but to me, they just look like rocks"

https://bsky.app/profile/maccoinnich.bsky.social
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #226  
Old Posted May 28, 2015, 6:29 AM
MarkDaMan's Avatar
MarkDaMan MarkDaMan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,587
^Yes! Good episode, btw.
__________________
make paradise, tear up a parking lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #227  
Old Posted May 28, 2015, 7:40 AM
2oh1's Avatar
2oh1 2oh1 is offline
9-7-2oh1-!
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: downtown Portland
Posts: 2,523
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkDaMan View Post
Off topic, this is the stupidest photo. Every time it's on OLive, which is quite often, I get peeved. What the hell is with Fritz's small head?
A small head for a small mind. I really hope someone steps up to run against her. Portland needs new leaders.

I love our parks, but I don't believe this was the best use of the money, especially at a time when they're struggling to find a way to fund roads. If they're going to jack up the cost of development, the money should go to housing or infrastructure. To me, this feels like a cash grab for somebody's pet projects (and, gee, who could that somebody be?). I really wish someone would step up to run against her.

I'd be totally supportive if we'd found a way to fund housing, roads, and all of the other things that keep creeping up in search of cash. I love our parks, but I don't believe now was the right time to push this through. Yeah, yeah, they're pushing back the start date a year. The fact that they had to do that to push it through just reinforces my opinion that it's the wrong time.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkDaMan View Post
On topic, with the passing of the levy, increase in annual budget and new development fees, they couldn't put something other than a parking lot on our newest park block? Absurd!
Absurd indeed.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #228  
Old Posted Jun 9, 2015, 6:13 PM
maccoinnich maccoinnich is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Portland
Posts: 8,115
Quote:
Portlanders officially have a new — unnamed park, with stunning views of downtown, Willamette River



Grab a blanket and a good book.

Portland officially owns a nearly three-acre plot of land along a bluff in the Cathedral Park neighborhood that parks officials say is now open for picnics and relaxation.

In March, the Portland City Council signed off on a deal to buy land at North Crawford Street and North Polk Avenue for $880,000, using parks system development charges.

While the bureau is thrilled to add such a scenic property to its portfolio — the land offers stunning views of the Willamette River's railroad bridge and downtown in the distance — there's no immediate plan to develop the park or even name it.

"It may be down the line until it's developed," Mark Ross, parks spokesman said. "But even in its current state, it's quite enjoyable, with killer views."
...continues at the Oregonian.
__________________
"Maybe to an architect, they might look suspicious, but to me, they just look like rocks"

https://bsky.app/profile/maccoinnich.bsky.social
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #229  
Old Posted Jun 10, 2015, 4:50 PM
maccoinnich maccoinnich is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Portland
Posts: 8,115
Quote:
Director Park needs $790,000 in repairs six years after opening



One of Portland's most architecturally celebrated parks needs $790,000 in "emergency structural repairs" less than six years after its ribbon-cutting ceremony.

Director Park, the bustling downtown urban plaza that cost $9.45 million to build, was among five finalists in 2011 for a prestigious Open Space Award bestowed by the Urban Land Institute.

Now part of that distinctive design is failing.

Parks officials say the wood beams that help support Director Park's overhead glass canopy have moisture damage and need to be replaced.
...continues at the Oregonian.
__________________
"Maybe to an architect, they might look suspicious, but to me, they just look like rocks"

https://bsky.app/profile/maccoinnich.bsky.social
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #230  
Old Posted Jun 10, 2015, 5:56 PM
2oh1's Avatar
2oh1 2oh1 is offline
9-7-2oh1-!
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: downtown Portland
Posts: 2,523
Awe. They have to fix the beams for the glass canopy. I was hoping that if repairs were needed, they'd be for that awful fountain... as if to suggest the fountain is only lame because something went wrong or is breaking down. The fountain has such an amazing location and a great shape, but the water sprays are really just a few little trickles that manage to detract from the beauty of the park rather than add to it. I don't mind that the fountain sprays are so light, but couldn't they at least have a pattern of some kind? The sprayers look as if no thought went into their placement at all. It's rare to see the fountain sprays as active as seen here, and as seen here, it's lame.



I love Director Park, but that fountain is lame.

Last edited by 2oh1; Jun 10, 2015 at 6:15 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #231  
Old Posted Jun 25, 2015, 4:17 PM
maccoinnich maccoinnich is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Portland
Posts: 8,115
Quote:
The Central Question: Fixing up Portland's eastside waterfront gains new momentum



Portland officials have had big plans for the east bank of the Willamette River for more than 25 years.

In 1988, they called for the waterfront to serve as a "binding element" between downtown and the Central Eastside. In 1994, they unveiled a sweeping vision for a park that would rival the west side's Tom McCall Waterfront Park, with a restaurant, public market and amphitheater.

By 2003, they had spent $2.1 million on designs for a park that was a "jewel in the making," with a waterfall, soaring overlooks, a café, access to the river and restored habitat.
...continues at the Oregonian.
__________________
"Maybe to an architect, they might look suspicious, but to me, they just look like rocks"

https://bsky.app/profile/maccoinnich.bsky.social
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #232  
Old Posted Jul 4, 2015, 7:15 AM
maccoinnich maccoinnich is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Portland
Posts: 8,115
I am a total loss as to how a) Parks can be pleading poverty, when they are literally receiving millions of dollars in SDCs from development in the Pearl and b) how they are estimating that they need $5-10 million for this park. By way of comparison the Fields is 3.2 acres, and cost $4 million to build.

Quote:
Neighbors say they were promised a park, interim arrangement isn’t working

BY ALLAN CLASSEN

Everyone agrees that the parking lot west of Pacific Northwest College of Art will eventually become one of the North Park Blocks.

What happens until then is the question, and some neighbors aren’t pleased with interim plans.

Half of the block has been paved and striped for 29 parking stalls. The other half can be rented for events.

“This ‘other portion’ is full of cars in un-num- bered spaces that do not have city parking vouch- ers,” said Thom King, a board member of the Flanders Lofts HOA and Portland Clean & Safe.

“All of my neighbors, friends and colleagues in this area have expressed to me their disap- pointment that the city of Portland dedicated that area as an extension of the Park Blocks, but in the end it has become a parking lot for PNCA as well as free parking for whoever parks there,” King said. “We want the park that we were promised.”
...continues at page 9 of the NW Examiner [PDF].
__________________
"Maybe to an architect, they might look suspicious, but to me, they just look like rocks"

https://bsky.app/profile/maccoinnich.bsky.social
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #233  
Old Posted Jul 5, 2015, 3:23 AM
Abide's Avatar
Abide Abide is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 388
Couldn't agree more. Repaving that lot was a bullcrap move.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #234  
Old Posted Jul 6, 2015, 7:17 PM
maccoinnich maccoinnich is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Portland
Posts: 8,115
Notice of a Pre-Application Conference [PDF] for Beech Park:

Quote:
Pre-Application Conference to discuss a Type III Conditional Use Review for a new 15.7-acre City park that will include: a community gathering area with picnic shelter, walkways, community garden, playground, water play, skate dot, basketball court, informal soccer field, fenced off-leash dog area, and public restrooms. Right-of-way improvements and parking are also proposed. Stormwater will be addrerssed via drywells and swales.
__________________
"Maybe to an architect, they might look suspicious, but to me, they just look like rocks"

https://bsky.app/profile/maccoinnich.bsky.social
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #235  
Old Posted Jul 6, 2015, 9:11 PM
zilfondel zilfondel is offline
Submarine de Nucléar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Missouri
Posts: 4,481
Quote:
Originally Posted by maccoinnich View Post
...continues at the Oregonian.
Quote:
Now, though, Lindberg and Vera Katz, Portland's mayor at the time, say any great vision for the east bank hinges on removing it.

"You have to get rid of that freeway," Katz said. "Then the dream of bringing the eastside to the river would really be coming true."
Thought that was a good quote.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #236  
Old Posted Jul 10, 2015, 10:48 PM
maccoinnich maccoinnich is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Portland
Posts: 8,115
Quote:
Under Armour commits to fixing up two Portland city parks



Under Armour Inc. plans to fix up two city parks as part of its big Portland expansion.

The Baltimore-based sportswear company in April announced plans to move in part of its footwear division into the former YMCA building just south of downtown. On Friday, the city said Under Armour also will fix up two city parks, likely including Duniway Park, which is adjacent to the company's new building.

Lents Park also likely will get an upgrade.
...continues at the Portland Business Journal.
__________________
"Maybe to an architect, they might look suspicious, but to me, they just look like rocks"

https://bsky.app/profile/maccoinnich.bsky.social
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #237  
Old Posted Jul 15, 2015, 5:12 PM
maccoinnich maccoinnich is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Portland
Posts: 8,115
Beautiful:

Quote:
A top Portland cultural attraction looks to raise $33.5M for expansion





The Portland Japanese Garden is looking to make some major changes.

The Garden has launched a capital campaign to raise $33.5 million. The group said the Cultural Crossing campaign could help it better serve a 10-fold increase in visitors since the facility was built 52 years ago.

It will feature a LEED-certified Cultural Village that includes a blend of traditional Japanese style and modern design elements, such as sliding wood screens, operable window walls and living roofs.
...continues at the Portland Business Journal.
__________________
"Maybe to an architect, they might look suspicious, but to me, they just look like rocks"

https://bsky.app/profile/maccoinnich.bsky.social
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #238  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2015, 7:12 PM
CouvScott CouvScott is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Washougal, WA
Posts: 1,109
Portland Japanese Garden expansion to start construction

By: Inka Bajandas July 15, 2015 4:00 pm


After years of preparation, a pause during the recession and a state land-use appeal, the Portland Japanese Garden’s plans to expand are moving forward.

Garden officials this week said Hoffman Construction Co. crews are scheduled to start work in late August on a $33.5 million expansion project aimed at accommodating the growing number of visitors to the 5.5-acre garden in Portland’s Washington Park. The project to add four new buildings and landscaped areas is being designed by the Japanese firm Kengo Kuma & Associates in collaboration with Portland Japanese Garden curator Sadafumi Uchiyama and Portland-based firms THA Architecture Inc. and Walker Macy.

When the garden first opened 48 years ago, it received about 30,000 visitors a year. Now, more than 300,000 visitors pass through the garden’s gates annually, often detracting from its intent to be a peaceful place, Portland Japanese Garden Chief Executive Officer Stephen Bloom said at a press conference Tuesday.

“While it may have been tranquil with 30,000 people, with 10 times that it was starting to impact that,” he said. “So the garden is not overrun; we have (designed) buildings and places for people to be. That was first and foremost.”

But shortly after plans were made in 2007 to expand the garden, a recession hit and officials decided to hold off on fundraising efforts, Bloom said.

“We thought perhaps it was not the best time to raise $30 million,” he said. “We put the project on hold for a few years.”

Once the economy improved, the project first had to undergo the city of Portland’s land-use approval process. The Japanese Garden Society of Oregon, a private nonprofit, operates the garden on 9.1 acres leased from the city. The expansion project will increase that acreage to 12.5.

These plans were criticized by neighbors of the garden who raised concerns that insufficient public feedback was gathered on the project involving park property and that the expansion would block access to a well-used footpath that connects to Washington Park’s popular Wildwood Trail. Last fall, Portland architect Hilary Mackenzie, who lives near the garden, appealed the city’s conditional approval of the project to the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals.

LUBA dismissed the appeal in March, upholding city approval of the project, and garden officials confirmed the expansion plans were proceeding. Bloom said on Tuesday that more than $20 million has been raised so far to pay for the project. This includes $1.5 million in state lottery bond funding.

Portland City Commissioner Amanda Fritz, who oversees Portland Parks & Recreation, said city officials are happy to see the project move forward.

“It’s been a very tricky land-use process,” she said. “We really appreciate the partnership with the Japanese Garden staff … The enhancements to the Japanese Garden are going to make it even more special.”

Project plans call for 11,328 square feet of new construction, including a relocated entrance and ticketing pavilion and adjacent Cultural Village with several new buildings.

“The idea of the design was to build a small Japanese village,” Bloom said.

In the Cultural Village, a new Village House will be built with a gift shop, art galleries, Japanese gardening library, multipurpose classroom and administrative offices. The Cultural Village will also include the new Tateuchi Courtyard, a plaza for hosting seasonal activities, performances and demonstrations, an upgraded maintenance facility for gardening staffers and a tea café.

“We listened to our members and we listened to our visitors and the biggest thing they said is we want a place where we can sit and have tea,” Bloom said.

The project will relocate the main entrance to align with the garden’s existing parking lot on Southwest Kingston Avenue instead of at the top of a steep hill. This will ease access to the garden, Bloom said.

“We knew that there were logistical and safety issues that we had to address,” he said.

The hillside will then be enveloped into the garden to become part of a series of new landscaped areas, including a bonsai tree terrace and Japanese tea flower garden.

The Portland Japanese Garden expansion is Kengo Kuma & Associates’ first public project in North America, said Balazs Bognar , the firm’s chief manager and design director. Nature and the existing gardens served as chief inspiration for the design, he said.

“The gardens are at the heart of the design,” Bognar said. “We are not touching the existing gardens. Those are perfect. What we are doing as the architect part of the team is simply filling in the gaps.”

A groundbreaking celebration for the project is scheduled for Aug. 31 with plans to close the garden starting on Sept. 8 during the height of construction. The garden will reopen on March 1 while construction continues. The project is scheduled to be complete by spring 2017.
__________________
A mind that is expanded by a new idea can never return to it's original dimensions.

Last edited by CouvScott; Jul 16, 2015 at 7:28 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #239  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2015, 8:09 PM
maccoinnich maccoinnich is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Portland
Posts: 8,115


















__________________
"Maybe to an architect, they might look suspicious, but to me, they just look like rocks"

https://bsky.app/profile/maccoinnich.bsky.social
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #240  
Old Posted Jul 28, 2015, 12:48 AM
maccoinnich maccoinnich is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Portland
Posts: 8,115
Quote:
Business, real estate groups file lawsuit over Portland 'money-grab'


A collection of business and real estate interests has filed a lawsuit to block dramatically higher development fees approved in May by the Portland City Council.

The fee hikes, slated to go into effect July 1, 2016, would double and in some cases nearly quadruple the parks-related fees paid by builders and developers.

City officials say they need to raise fees to expand the parks system and improve existing facilities to meet greater demand. But business and real estate groups strongly criticized the city's complicated methodology, which projected $552 million in fees over the next 20 years.

The lawsuit, filed Friday in Multnomah County Circuit Court, had been expected.
...continues at the Oregonian.
__________________
"Maybe to an architect, they might look suspicious, but to me, they just look like rocks"

https://bsky.app/profile/maccoinnich.bsky.social
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > Portland > Parks, Metro, Urban Design & Heritage Issues
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:54 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.