Quote:
Originally Posted by lio45
That's actually a very good example: no one would ever think of putting any of the largest existing grain elevators in the country on an "ugliest buildings" list. But if a gigantic caricature of a grain elevator stood out by being visually dominating (taller/bigger than everything else) in downtown Winnipeg, everyone'd complain about it, rightfully. They'd hate it, and wish it was demolished.
In fact I'm fully okay with The Rooms as a top ten ugly for "ugly in context" or "most hated buildings" but not for "ugly in a vacuum". There are TONS of buildings uglier than this inoffensive, super simple mix of basic geometric figures.
|
Context is a big part of architecture (at least it should be), we don't live in vacuums and we should design our buildings to work with their surroundings. Sometimes contrast is what is needed and we all need some variety. "We have to change in order to stay the same" was a quote from Philip Glass and a very apt statement when it comes to art and architectural history.
I have to disagree with the grain elevator dominating the city being completely out of context. Regina built the FCC building and its genes most definitely come from the prairies and grain elevators and it turned out interesting and one of Regina's better buildings.
from Regina in pictures (Miggs blog).
There's no mistaking the history in this form, but I also believe while it's not an actual grain elevator the homage to farming within Regina's context makes a lot of sense. As much as say there's a rural/urban split, Regina exists because of farming originally and while Regina has moved on to some oil and potash and steel and other options, the general vibe in the city is still linked to how things are going in the growing season.
I love The Rooms for its story it tells, but it needed to look more like actual large scale building instead of like it was just growth-rayed into existence. Its contextual failure certainly makes it a candidate for ugliest and a great talking point on the context of form and as O-tacular pointed out the effect of materials as well.