HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1241  
Old Posted May 29, 2015, 7:53 PM
thurmas's Avatar
thurmas thurmas is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Posts: 7,598
The imbalance of power revenue generation wise between the Western and Eastern CFL teams is alarming. The CFL seriously needs to go to revenue sharing like the NFL so the league can market itself more effectively and grow more effectively instead of just the Riders sitting on a pile of dough that only helps 1 team out of 9.
     
     
  #1242  
Old Posted May 29, 2015, 8:18 PM
blueandgoldguy blueandgoldguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,853
Quote:
Originally Posted by thurmas View Post
The imbalance of power revenue generation wise between the Western and Eastern CFL teams is alarming. The CFL seriously needs to go to revenue sharing like the NFL so the league can market itself more effectively and grow more effectively instead of just the Riders sitting on a pile of dough that only helps 1 team out of 9.
The closest the CFL will ever come to revenue sharing is the national tv contract as all teams have given up their right to a local tv contract. All the other teams don't have the substantial annual operating profits to justify revenue - sharing...except the Riders and there has never been a pro league in which one team and one team only has provided revenue sharing to the league's weaker sisters.
     
     
  #1243  
Old Posted May 29, 2015, 8:27 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,480
Quote:
Originally Posted by blueandgoldguy View Post
The closest the CFL will ever come to revenue sharing is the national tv contract as all teams have given up their right to a local tv contract. All the other teams don't have the substantial annual operating profits to justify revenue - sharing...except the Riders and there has never been a pro league in which one team and one team only has provided revenue sharing to the league's weaker sisters.
Yeah, even these days, I'd wager that the margins are too tight in the CFL to allow for meaningful revenue sharing. Even the Riders probably couldn't handle a significant revenue sharing hit, and I'd think it would be a non-starter for the other western teams.

Anyway, I hadn't really thought of it in those terms, but yeah, the TSN deal basically IS revenue sharing. League revenues would be quite lopsided if the teams sold their regional rights, although I wonder how revenues would look if they did it that way?
     
     
  #1244  
Old Posted May 29, 2015, 8:44 PM
Nathan's Avatar
Nathan Nathan is offline
Hmm....
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Regina
Posts: 3,505
Quote:
Originally Posted by thurmas View Post
The imbalance of power revenue generation wise between the Western and Eastern CFL teams is alarming. The CFL seriously needs to go to revenue sharing like the NFL so the league can market itself more effectively and grow more effectively instead of just the Riders sitting on a pile of dough that only helps 1 team out of 9.
The optics are quite poor though. With the Riders being community owned, all "profits" are designated for a stabilisation reserve, improvements to the team/operations, and thousands and thousands of $ of community support initiatives (in last year's report, it added up to over $1 million in sponsorships, donations, and initiatives). You would in effect be syphoning this money to support a private owner would actually personally draw profit (this applies for Winnipeg and Edmonton too).

There'd be a pretty massive uproar here too... In the past the Riders had to hold telethons, have lotteries, barter wheat for tickets, have loans forgiven by the province, rent-free stadium use, etc to just barely scrape by, while the likes of Toronto and Montreal were giving away massive contracts to players (Flutie, Rocket Ismail, Ferragamo, etc).

In any case, as the TV deal improves, it will become a larger and larger part of overall revenue for each team. And this is something that is equally split/shared along with merch bought at non-team stores, league-wide sponsorships (e.g. Grey Cup presented by Shaw), etc.
     
     
  #1245  
Old Posted May 29, 2015, 9:59 PM
Oilkountry's Avatar
Oilkountry Oilkountry is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,868
Speaking of the TV deal its been extended from the original year of 2018 to 2021. (I realize this isn't stadium related but its kinda slow right now) I feel like this was a good move more both parties. Although with all the stadium craze could the league have gotten a better deal? I would probably ride this deal out now and do everything in your power to grow the game to get double that money in 2022. Its never been reported the amount the deal is for but I've heard 40M per season and 36M per season. My question has always been the ESPN deal. It came after the TSN deal so is their additional revenue for that? at 40M per season that's like 4.5M per team, but I'm sure the league takes a cut as well. So even at 3.8M per season that's a good chunk of your salaries off the table.
     
     
  #1246  
Old Posted May 29, 2015, 10:09 PM
thurmas's Avatar
thurmas thurmas is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Posts: 7,598
I am just saying watch out when the Riders open their new stadium and the amount of revenue they will be able to generate compared to say the Montreal Alouettes in old Molson stadium which just has a few private suites and metal benches. Say hypothetically the Riders generate a $30 million profit in 2017 where is that profit best utilized? Going right into Riders pockets to benefit 1 club or spread throughout the league for better marketing to kids and young people and more name recognition of CFL players throughout Canada. We have tor realize the damage that was done to the cfl in the 80's 90's and early 2000's of their horrible lack of marketing, get rich quick signings of big name players that failed and poor decisions in choosing the proper sized stadiums as homes for clubs that only now the league had finally climbed out of.
     
     
  #1247  
Old Posted May 29, 2015, 10:31 PM
Nathan's Avatar
Nathan Nathan is offline
Hmm....
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Regina
Posts: 3,505
^^Well the Stadium was made possible through surcharges on tickets bought by fans and funding from the province/city, so the money would be best utilised by giving back to the people who made it possible (to a greater degree than they already do).

And I doubt it would go that high. I'm guessing the stadium will add a couple million to the bottom line... Not massive in magnitude, but on a percentage basis, which the tweet talked about, it is a large value.
     
     
  #1248  
Old Posted May 30, 2015, 12:41 AM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,204
I'm watching the FIFA game at THF, and the turf looks and plays TERRIBLE!!!
     
     
  #1249  
Old Posted May 30, 2015, 2:09 AM
elly63 elly63 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 9,783
Quote:
Originally Posted by caltrane74 View Post
I'm watching the FIFA game at THF, and the turf looks and plays TERRIBLE!!!
???

If by FIFA game, you mean Canada/England I have no idea what you're talking about. Does somebody have to post that TFC fan pic again?
     
     
  #1250  
Old Posted May 30, 2015, 2:26 AM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,204
stadium looks nice though...
     
     
  #1251  
Old Posted May 30, 2015, 2:34 AM
Oilkountry's Avatar
Oilkountry Oilkountry is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,868
I thought commonwealth had to get a new turf before this tourney?

*update* they did put in a new turf and the idiots didnt fix the endzones.....STUPID!! I dont know why I'm so offended by this but holy Christ I could snap. Not only that they cheaped out and used the corners from the old field because they were still new. To save what $10,000? So Edmonton




Last edited by Oilkountry; May 30, 2015 at 2:48 AM.
     
     
  #1252  
Old Posted May 30, 2015, 3:17 AM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,480
^ It's such a tiny sliver of field we're talking about...honestly, it will make zero difference.
     
     
  #1253  
Old Posted May 30, 2015, 3:41 AM
itom 987's Avatar
itom 987 itom 987 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 5,085
     
     
  #1254  
Old Posted May 30, 2015, 3:59 AM
Oilkountry's Avatar
Oilkountry Oilkountry is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,868
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
^ It's such a tiny sliver of field we're talking about...honestly, it will make zero difference.
that's not the huge deal. I just cant believe they didn't fill that circle in. That's a joke
     
     
  #1255  
Old Posted May 30, 2015, 4:32 AM
Boris2k7's Avatar
Boris2k7 Boris2k7 is offline
Majestic
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Calgary
Posts: 11,960
Quote:
Originally Posted by itom 987 View Post
Awesome. I love how this is shaping up. I wish our own arena/stadium proposal would shape up as well.
__________________
"The only thing that gets me through our winters is the knowledge that they're the only thing keeping us free of giant ass spiders." -MonkeyRonin

Flickr
     
     
  #1256  
Old Posted May 30, 2015, 5:19 AM
ScreamingViking's Avatar
ScreamingViking ScreamingViking is offline
Ham-burgher
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 7,476
Quote:
Originally Posted by thurmas View Post
The imbalance of power revenue generation wise between the Western and Eastern CFL teams is alarming. The CFL seriously needs to go to revenue sharing like the NFL so the league can market itself more effectively and grow more effectively instead of just the Riders sitting on a pile of dough that only helps 1 team out of 9.
The imbalance is there, but I don't think there's a need for a formal revenue sharing system now. Maybe once the stability is much more established, and we know longer-term how profitable the East teams will be and whether the Riders' phenomenal success continues (no reason to think it will not, but we've seen plenty of feast/famine in the league over the decades).

Given the various bailouts and parachuted ownerships in the past, there's been a sharing concept. A concept that is hopefully no longer needed.
     
     
  #1257  
Old Posted May 30, 2015, 5:21 AM
craner's Avatar
craner craner is online now
Go Tall or Go Home
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 7,401
^^Or at least "show up".
     
     
  #1258  
Old Posted May 30, 2015, 5:34 AM
thmx
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Content removed
     
     
  #1259  
Old Posted May 30, 2015, 2:18 PM
mistercorporate's Avatar
mistercorporate mistercorporate is offline
The Fruit of Discipline
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,036
Fantastic turnout for a WNT friendly, way to go Hamilton!
__________________
MLS: Toronto FC
Canadian Premier League: York 9 FC
NBA: Raptors
     
     
  #1260  
Old Posted May 30, 2015, 3:42 PM
craner's Avatar
craner craner is online now
Go Tall or Go Home
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 7,401
THF looks great!
What was the score?
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:39 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.