HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Hamilton > Transportation & Infrastructure


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2741  
Old Posted May 26, 2015, 1:58 PM
Dr Awesomesauce's Avatar
Dr Awesomesauce Dr Awesomesauce is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: BEYOND THE OUTER RIM
Posts: 5,889
Rad.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2742  
Old Posted May 26, 2015, 2:50 PM
interr0bangr interr0bangr is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Landsdale
Posts: 559
With International Village being so narrow, there's talk that it will be cut off from cars completely. This means Main will need to be converted to 2-way, yes? I wonder what other streets will have to be converted to make this work. I'm worried they might rip the bike lanes from Cannon to add more westbound capacity again.

Exciting and a little bit scary times ahead, this will be so transformative it's hard to even imagine it's real!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2743  
Old Posted May 26, 2015, 2:56 PM
markbarbera markbarbera is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 3,050
I am quite optimistic for what lies ahead as this allows for a reimagined LRT route. I would suspect Metrolinx would prefer to use Bay Street to run the spur to the station as there is a wider clearance that would better accomodate a dedicated LRT route. James is too narrow to allow for dedicated track. In fact, now that Metrolinx is more actively involved, I would not be surprised to see the route placed along Main instead of King. Main has a wider clearance and runs more direct, making it less expensive to lay track. Plus there is much greater potential for developing higher density along that route. Main has a less defined streetwall than King with fewer buildings of historical interest to complicate redevelopment.

My prediction is the route will ultimately run along Main from McMaster GO bus terminal east towards Bay, then north on Bay to loop in front of West Harbour GO station, heading back south to Main, then east to Queenston Circle, where the former City Motor site could be used as bus terminal to connect HSR routes that serve the east end of the city. With the LRT on Main, a future, high-order pedestrian connection to the Hamilton GO Centre Station could easily be simply the pedestrianization of Hughson Street between Main and Hunter.
__________________
"A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul"
-George Bernard Shaw
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2744  
Old Posted May 26, 2015, 3:03 PM
thistleclub thistleclub is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,729
Ontario Investing Up to $1 Billion for Light Rail Transit in Hamilton
(Office of the Premier, May 26 2015)

Ontario will provide up to $1 billion to build a new light rail transit (LRT) line in Hamilton as part of the largest infrastructure investment in Ontario's history.

Premier Kathleen Wynne announced the funding today while in Hamilton. The province will cover 100 per cent of the capital costs of building the LRT, which will help grow the economy, reduce travel times and connect people to jobs and to other transit systems.

New, modern light rail vehicles on tracks separated from regular traffic will offer speedy service from McMaster University through downtown Hamilton to Queenston Circle. The LRT will connect directly to the new West Harbour GO Station, which is now under construction, and protect for a future, high-order pedestrian connection to the Hamilton Centre GO Station. The LRT will ultimately extend to Eastgate Square. Procurement for the LRT will start in 2017, with construction starting in 2019.


Read it in full here.

Will be interested to see what routing and stops are identified.
__________________
"Where architectural imagination is absent, the case is hopeless." - Louis Sullivan
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2745  
Old Posted May 26, 2015, 3:22 PM
lucasmascotto's Avatar
lucasmascotto lucasmascotto is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 356
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr Awesomesauce View Post
I don't know what to say - it's just really, really embarrassing.

Get a real job, Chad and leave the work of city building to the big boys and girls - you're well out of your depth.
I don't normally like to trash people even politicians but frankly I don't know what good he does. Aside from supporting the opening and development of Bayfront Park, his track record in terms of civic development has been pretty timid. He aligns his ideologies with that of fringe exoburb thinking even though his area is very urban in design and demographic. He was elected at the age of 20, and has been in power for over 20 years with absolutely no community planning or organization experience beforehand. For God's sake, he was a video store clerk before getting elected! He's turned his position into a life-long career and in such refuses to push any sort of motion that might stir up the smallest amount of controversy because he doesn't want to shake the consciousness of his tiny voting cohort. Ugh...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2746  
Old Posted May 26, 2015, 3:25 PM
interr0bangr interr0bangr is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Landsdale
Posts: 559
Quote:
Originally Posted by markbarbera View Post
I am quite optimistic for what lies ahead as this allows for a reimagined LRT route. I would suspect Metrolinx would prefer to use Bay Street to run the spur to the station as there is a wider clearance that would better accomodate a dedicated LRT route. James is too narrow to allow for dedicated track. In fact, now that Metrolinx is more actively involved, I would not be surprised to see the route placed along Main instead of King. Main has a wider clearance and runs more direct, making it less expensive to lay track. Plus there is much greater potential for developing higher density along that route. Main has a less defined streetwall than King with fewer buildings of historical interest to complicate redevelopment.

My prediction is the route will ultimately run along Main from McMaster GO bus terminal east towards Bay, then north on Bay to loop in front of West Harbour GO station, heading back south to Main, then east to Queenston Circle, where the former City Motor site could be used as bus terminal to connect HSR routes that serve the east end of the city. With the LRT on Main, a future, high-order pedestrian connection to the Hamilton GO Centre Station could easily be simply the pedestrianization of Hughson Street between Main and Hunter.
The problem with Main is that there's nothing on Main. Just a terrible street from start to finish, destroyed by how much of a highway it's been for so long. The LRT would help spark the healing process and Main is so close to King, so it's still a good option, but keeping the LRT on King is still my preference I think.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2747  
Old Posted May 26, 2015, 3:34 PM
lucasmascotto's Avatar
lucasmascotto lucasmascotto is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 356
I wanna' make a wikipedia article, or at least update one, on LRT in Hamilton. What's the name of the system, is it just "B-Line (Hamilton) LRT" or is there something else? "B-Line Hamilton LRT" is what's linked to the Metrolinx, HSR, and Light Rail Transit in Canada wikipedia pages.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2748  
Old Posted May 26, 2015, 3:39 PM
SteelTown's Avatar
SteelTown SteelTown is offline
It's Hammer Time
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 20,364
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2749  
Old Posted May 26, 2015, 3:42 PM
lucasmascotto's Avatar
lucasmascotto lucasmascotto is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 356
Quote:
Originally Posted by SteelTown View Post
Perfect, I'll work with that! Thanks!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2750  
Old Posted May 26, 2015, 3:45 PM
HillStreetBlues HillStreetBlues is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: KW/Hamilton, Ontario
Posts: 995
Quote:
Originally Posted by interr0bangr View Post
The problem with Main is that there's nothing on Main. Just a terrible street from start to finish, destroyed by how much of a highway it's been for so long.
There's nothing on Main, which means plenty of redevelopment opportunity. The fact that it is a five-lane one-way highway means construction will be easier. And it is as close to anything as King is.

(It's also not quite true that "nothing" is on Main.)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2751  
Old Posted May 26, 2015, 4:17 PM
lucasmascotto's Avatar
lucasmascotto lucasmascotto is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 356
Sorry to pester everyone here, I'm making a wikipedia transit map, and i'm trying to get a rough guess of how many stations there will be. This is what I have so far based upon the rapid transit study:

1. Queenston Traffic Circle
2. Kenilworth Avenue
3. The Delta
4. Scott Park (Gage Ave.)
5. Sherman Ave.
6. Wentworth Street
7. Wellington Street/Victoria Ave. (First Place)
8. MacNab Terminal
9. Queen Street
10. Dundurn Street
11. Longwood Road
12. McMaster University
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2752  
Old Posted May 26, 2015, 4:41 PM
thistleclub thistleclub is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,729
FWIW, here are the BRT stops identified in Metrolinx's King-Main Benefits Case (Feb 2010):

1. Eastgate Square
2. Nash Road
3. Parkdale Road

4. Queenston Traffic Circle
5. Kenilworth Avenue
6. Ottawa Street
7. Gage Avenue
8. Sherman Avenue
9. Wentworth Street
10. First Place
11. Gore Park
12. Bay Street
13. Queen Street
14. Dundurn Road [sic]
15. Westdale
16. Longwood Road/Main Street
17. McMaster University
__________________
"Where architectural imagination is absent, the case is hopeless." - Louis Sullivan
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2753  
Old Posted May 26, 2015, 5:10 PM
NortheastWind NortheastWind is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 639
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2754  
Old Posted May 26, 2015, 5:28 PM
interr0bangr interr0bangr is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Landsdale
Posts: 559
Quote:
Originally Posted by HillStreetBlues View Post
There's nothing on Main, which means plenty of redevelopment opportunity. The fact that it is a five-lane one-way highway means construction will be easier. And it is as close to anything as King is.

(It's also not quite true that "nothing" is on Main.)
Yeah I understand the advantages of redeveloping Main, and I don't fully disagree, I'd just prefer less car traffic on King to help support and intensity what's already there instead of bringing the transit through another street that needs decades of help and will never be able to match the character and retail frontage King has. I'm happy with an LRT whereever it ends up though.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2755  
Old Posted May 26, 2015, 6:03 PM
thistleclub thistleclub is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,729
Another take...



More detail: Hamilton B-Line: Value Uplift and Capture Study, Final Report (June 2010)

The MacNab Transit Terminal was under construction when this report was being assembled so it might be the proxy for "Bay" or "Gore Park" (or both), as either is <300m from that terminal.

My hunch is that "MacNab" subs for "Bay" and "Gore Park" is Hughson for better synergy with the Hamilton GO Centre, but the $1B cap ($1B 2015? $1B 2017? $1B 2019?) may force additional economies.
__________________
"Where architectural imagination is absent, the case is hopeless." - Louis Sullivan

Last edited by thistleclub; May 26, 2015 at 6:23 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2756  
Old Posted May 26, 2015, 8:02 PM
CaptainKirk CaptainKirk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,449
Quote:
Originally Posted by interr0bangr View Post
The problem with Main is that there's nothing on Main. Just a terrible street from start to finish, destroyed by how much of a highway it's been for so long. The LRT would help spark the healing process and Main is so close to King, so it's still a good option, but keeping the LRT on King is still my preference I think.
Agreed.

Convert the one way portion of Main to 2 way. Most of it is 2 way now anyway.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2757  
Old Posted May 26, 2015, 8:06 PM
drpgq drpgq is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Hamilton/Dresden
Posts: 1,859
I honestly still hate the spur. How often are trains going to be leaving from West Harbour to justify a spur? Wouldn't it be far cheaper to have a shuttle busfrom King or Main that meets up with the station whenever a train is actually going to leave? Although I suppose the spur could eventually be used to build an A-line.

I'm just glad though that this is getting funded. Comparing the amount of money the province has spent on transit in Toronto since thee Liberals first promised LRT in the 2007 election versus Hamilton, I'm sure the ratio is way, way over the 5:1 population ratio.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2758  
Old Posted May 26, 2015, 10:45 PM
SteelTown's Avatar
SteelTown SteelTown is offline
It's Hammer Time
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 20,364
I'm kind of eager and excited about the “high order pedestrian connection" to the GO Station Centre, I'd imagine it'll happen along Hunter St.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2759  
Old Posted May 26, 2015, 11:01 PM
king10 king10 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 2,776
Quote:
Originally Posted by drpgq View Post
I honestly still hate the spur. How often are trains going to be leaving from West Harbour to justify a spur? Wouldn't it be far cheaper to have a shuttle busfrom King or Main that meets up with the station whenever a train is actually going to leave? Although I suppose the spur could eventually be used to build an A-line.

I'm just glad though that this is getting funded. Comparing the amount of money the province has spent on transit in Toronto since thee Liberals first promised LRT in the 2007 election versus Hamilton, I'm sure the ratio is way, way over the 5:1 population ratio.

Well hopefully with the addition of the centennial station more trains will be running through james st.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2760  
Old Posted May 27, 2015, 1:52 AM
CaptainKirk CaptainKirk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,449
Quote:
Originally Posted by drpgq View Post
I honestly still hate the spur. How often are trains going to be leaving from West Harbour to justify a spur?
Keep in mind we probably won't see the LRT up and running till about 2025, and GO service should be increased quite substantially by then. Imagine all the development that will occur around there by then


Quote:
Although I suppose the spur could eventually be used to build an A-line.
I'm thinking that is the start of the A-line, which is another great aspect to this announcement. Gives the mountain, and the rest of the city, something more to be excited about
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Hamilton > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:42 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.