HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #12901  
Old Posted May 21, 2015, 2:18 PM
GeneW GeneW is offline
Northsider
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 657
Quote:
Originally Posted by TBone7281 View Post
Looks like the Bayer sign will be staying put for a while longer...

http://pittsburgh.cbslocal.com/2015/05/2...spute-halts-deal-to-makeover-bayer-sign/
I'm happy that the Peduto administration blocked this. I'd hate to see some horrible full color animated billboard polluting Mt. Washington.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12902  
Old Posted May 21, 2015, 2:32 PM
BrianTH BrianTH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,078
My idea for the Wilkinsburg train station would be to do an Allegheny County Transportation Museum. So many transportation eras have been represented in important ways either in nearby Wilkinsburg locations or even right on that very route--Native American trails, the Forbes Road, the Pennsylvania Road, the PA RR Main Line, the Lincoln Highway, the modern Interstate system, streetcars, the busway, even an early airport . . . I am imagining interactive exhibits as you walk through all that history.

Unfortunately I have none of the official or foundation support (nor the personal fortune) necessary to make that happen. But maybe they could do a cool themed restaurant along those lines.

Last edited by BrianTH; May 21, 2015 at 2:44 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12903  
Old Posted May 21, 2015, 4:01 PM
Brentsters Brentsters is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: chicago
Posts: 249
There's some tweets about a press conference with Faros and the city. Maybe renaming allegheny center nova place And making it a tech hub?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12904  
Old Posted May 21, 2015, 5:19 PM
Lobick Lobick is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 18
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brentsters View Post
There's some tweets about a press conference with Faros and the city. Maybe renaming allegheny center nova place And making it a tech hub?
Potentially great news for the Northside. Heard Innovation Works is relocating there. Get some of the tech sector to spill over from the East End. As all things though, the Devil is in the details.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12905  
Old Posted May 21, 2015, 5:21 PM
Austinlee's Avatar
Austinlee Austinlee is offline
Chillin' in The Burgh
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Spring Hill, Pittsburgh
Posts: 12,488
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brentsters View Post
There's some tweets about a press conference with Faros and the city. Maybe renaming allegheny center nova place And making it a tech hub?
Well well well... The SSP Pgh contributers called it again. We predicted an adaptive reuse with some type of reconnection effort through the middle.

Developer to turn Allegheny Center into a technology hub
May 21, 2015 1:00 PM
By Mark Belko / Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

http://www.post-gazette.com/local/city/2...to-a-technology-hub/stories/201505210194

Quote:
A New York developer unveiled plans today to convert the Allegheny Center mall on the North Side into a technology hub and campus to be known as Nova Place.

The multimillion dollar project being undertaken by Faros Properties will include an extensive renovation of the 1.2 million-square-foot complex, making it one of the largest redevelopment projects in the country, officials said.

Work will include upgraded offices, collaborative workspaces, new restaurants, a fitness center, a conference center and improved common areas.

In unveiling the changes, Faros announced that Innovation Works has signed a lease to occupy 12,000 square feet in the complex. The company will move from its current space in Pittsburgh to Allegheny Center next month and into permanent space in the fall.

Under its redevelopment plan, Faros intends to establish a technology incubator in the complex to advance and promote the entrepreneurial community in Pittsburgh.

One of the biggest changes it will be making on the aesthetic side will be to provide a path through the complex that will serve as a bridge to Downtown and other parts of the North Side.

"No longer will this be a wall separating the North Shore from the North Side," Mayor Bill Peduto said.

While not the perfect plan to tear down the mall this might be the next best thing to bring technology to that location and reconnect it as best as possible with the neighborhood.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12906  
Old Posted May 21, 2015, 6:44 PM
BrianTH BrianTH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,078
Quote:
Originally Posted by East Edge View Post
Along this same line does anyone know anything about an existing water taxi service or talk of an expansion of one as more of our river fronts gets developed?
My understanding is people have looked at this off and on, but it is really hard to make the numbers work financially. It turns out when you add up everything, water taxi services tend to be very expensive. And because of bends, no-wake zones, and such, speeds would not be all that competitive. But maybe more waterfront development will change that equation.

Quote:
It would even be cool if there was a kayak rental system like all of the healthy ride bike rental stations popping up around town. Swipe a card to release a kayak in the strip and head to the north shore and dock it there. Then someone else can use it to head to Southside works, etc. The current may be too strong for some but interesting in theory.
So you are probably aware you can rent kayaks at a location on the North Shore just across from Downtown:

https://www.ventureoutdoors.org/kayak-pittsburgh/kayak-pittsburgh-north-shore/

But I love the idea of a bike-share-like multi-station approach. I want to say I may have heard this sort of idea before (Tampa?), but I am not sure there have been many, if any, real examples. On the one hand that could mean some trial and error, but on the other it could mean some awesome publicity for Pittsburgh.

By the way, random aside, but I learned the other day that the currents on the rivers in the City tend to max out around 1 mph, and are usually much less (I thought it would be more). I think even a novice kayaker can usually do around 3 mph, so this seems like an idea with potentially widespread appeal.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12907  
Old Posted May 21, 2015, 6:49 PM
BrianTH BrianTH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,078
Nova Place doesn't sound quite as transformative as I might ideally want, but if it ends up being reasonably pleasant and convenient to walk through, I will take it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12908  
Old Posted May 21, 2015, 7:28 PM
Brentsters Brentsters is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: chicago
Posts: 249
Plans for the fort willow development in lawrenceville are posted.

http://www.lunited.org/fort-willow-development/

Phase I is 191 apartments. The bay arcade thing is pretty cool. Looks like a lot of parking and I'm not sure how great the materials will look in person. Overall good for the area though.

There's going to be a lot of u-shaped buildings in a few years.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12909  
Old Posted May 21, 2015, 8:23 PM
GeneW GeneW is offline
Northsider
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 657
Some images of Nova Place in the North Side Chronicle.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12910  
Old Posted May 21, 2015, 8:57 PM
DKNewYork DKNewYork is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianTH View Post
My idea for the Wilkinsburg train station would be to do an Allegheny County Transportation Museum. So many transportation eras have been represented in important ways either in nearby Wilkinsburg locations or even right on that very route--Native American trails, the Forbes Road, the Pennsylvania Road, the PA RR Main Line, the Lincoln Highway, the modern Interstate system, streetcars, the busway, even an early airport . . . I am imagining interactive exhibits as you walk through all that history.

Unfortunately I have none of the official or foundation support (nor the personal fortune) necessary to make that happen. But maybe they could do a cool themed restaurant along those lines.
I think that's a brilliant idea and the Wilkinsburg train station is the perfect venue. I keep hoping that the local Engineers' Society establishes a Bridge Museum in Pittsburgh.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12911  
Old Posted May 21, 2015, 9:01 PM
BrianTH BrianTH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,078
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brentsters View Post
Plans for the fort willow development in lawrenceville are posted.
Personally, I think that Bay 4 Arcade thing is pretty cool.

The new surface parking lot--not so much.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12912  
Old Posted May 21, 2015, 9:06 PM
BrianTH BrianTH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,078
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeneW View Post
Some images of Nova Place
It looks reasonably nice, but the new path through still looks windy, not at all intuitive, and certainly not bike-friendly with the steps.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12913  
Old Posted May 21, 2015, 9:58 PM
AaronPGH's Avatar
AaronPGH AaronPGH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: PGH
Posts: 1,801
Forward steps for Allegheny Center are better than nothing. Hopefully over time demand will increase and the developers will commit to incremental improvements.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12914  
Old Posted May 22, 2015, 12:01 AM
Austinlee's Avatar
Austinlee Austinlee is offline
Chillin' in The Burgh
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Spring Hill, Pittsburgh
Posts: 12,488
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeneW View Post
Some images of Nova Place in the North Side Chronicle.
Nice!

Quote:
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12915  
Old Posted May 22, 2015, 12:41 AM
eschaton eschaton is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 5,634
It's funny, because just the other week I was walking through Allegheny Center - my first time going through the building proper actually. I was thinking about how nice the rear patio would be if it wasn't a hot pad of concrete - if it in some way continued the bucolic feel of the tree-lined sidewalks just to the north. Looks like they concurred.

I'm not sure what could really be done to improve the entrance at the Federal intersection though. Better signage and landscaping would make it seem not so bleak, but without partially demolishing the core of the building I think that's all you could do.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brentsters View Post
Plans for the fort willow development in lawrenceville are posted.
Ugh. Big, suburban setback from Willow Street, along with more parking than is required by zoning (I guess - 191 units and 153 spaces is is under the 1 space/1 unit rule Lawrenceville falls under I thought). I'm not a fan of the massing either - I wish they had rotated the front wing to hide the parking better.

That said, the actual apartment design is just a little bit more inspired than the norm for Pittsburgh apartments.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12916  
Old Posted May 22, 2015, 2:46 AM
BrianTH BrianTH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,078
Quote:
Originally Posted by AaronPGH View Post
Forward steps for Allegheny Center are better than nothing. Hopefully over time demand will increase and the developers will commit to incremental improvements.
Yep, I am not at all opposed to this project. But sometimes constructive criticism can actually be incorporated during the design and approval process.

When I was eyeballing it in person the other day, I did understand that part of the problem is that the plaza level is way above Federal on the Downtown side. I'd still be interested in seeing whether some sort of bikable ramp was possible.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12917  
Old Posted May 22, 2015, 10:43 AM
BrianTH BrianTH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,078
http://www.bizjournals.com/pittsburgh/bl...heres-your-first-look-at-ubers-self.html

Quote:
While Uber Technologies Inc. has been quietly setting up shop in Pittsburgh for its Advanced Technologies Center, the company's test cars that are now hitting the road are less inconspicuous. If the words "Uber Advanced Technologies Center" emblazoned on the side of the vehicle weren't enough of a giveaway, the device rotating on the top of the vehicle signals this isn't your average Ford. "This vehicle is part of our early research efforts regarding mapping, safety and autonomy systems," Uber spokeswoman Trina Smith said in an email.


Quote:
Barclay's Johnson predicts that auto sales may drop 40 percent in the next 25 years because of shared driverless cars. The market for autonomous technology is expected to grow to $42 billion by 2025 and self-driving cars may account for a quarter of global auto sales by 2035, according to an analysis by Boston Consulting Group.
Artist's rendering of what that will look like:

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12918  
Old Posted May 22, 2015, 12:45 PM
BrianTH BrianTH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,078
By the way, the other day I deliberately walked from Federal at North to Downtown in as straight a path as I could manage, just to sort of make mental notes about what was bad about that and what I thought could be improved. Obviously the asphalt plaza and mall as they stand are a huge barrier, and this plan looks like a big improvement if not exactly what I would have wanted.

But there were a lot of other problems too. One obvious one is those crappy triangle intersections at N Commons and S Commons. Those have got to go.

I also thought the path from N Commons down to Buhl Park could be much better:



The way this is set up right now is strange and I think discourages exploration. Imagine if that lawn space on the left (behind the dude on the phone) was another path, with the trees next to the existing sidewalk as a sort of median strip. That new path could actually be laid out as a bike lane, in fact. If you did that, I think suddenly that would look like an inviting bike/ped boulevard.

That would also solve another subtle problem I noted, which is that there is an odd juncture when you get to Buhl Park/Ohio. The existing path dead-ends into a statute, and a new, different path offset to the right takes you to the plaza/mall area. It may not seem like a big deal, but if you get that far from N Commons, it again communicates you are entering private space if you continue to the south (and vice-versa, in fact, if you have arrived at Buhl Park from the south, east, or west, and are contemplating heading north):



But the new path I suggested above would more or less line up with that existing path into the plaza/mall area. Again, I would love to incorporate a bike path, but even without that it would do a lot to create continuity and invite the public along.

So roughly speaking, you could be looking at this:





Now I don't know anything about land rights or easements, but I am pretty sure this is all well within the footprint of the former Federal, and I don't really see that strip of grass serving much purpose as of now. So hopefully it is something everyone around could get on board with.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12919  
Old Posted May 22, 2015, 3:16 PM
photoLith's Avatar
photoLith photoLith is offline
Ex Houstonian
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Pittsburgh n’ at
Posts: 15,998
Some not good news.

Census estimate shows Pittsburgh population decreasing

Quote:
The city of Pittsburgh lost 1,314 people in 2014 from the year before, a downturn after three straight years of small increases since the 2010 head count, according to new estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau.

The city’s population stood at 305,412 last July 1, say the estimates being released publicly today for municipalities across America. That is lower than both the estimate for 2013 and the official decennial count of 305,704 in April 2010. It is also less than half the size of the city at its peak in 1950.

The most recent drop is not surprising, as data released earlier this year for Allegheny County showed an estimated loss of 1,698 people. Pittsburgh is by far the county’s largest municipality, and it would be atypical for it to gain while the county loses.

.....

The new estimates, however, show how tough it is to overcome a long-term trend of more people dying than giving birth and a low rate of international immigration compared with other cities. Mr. McNulty said an announcement is upcoming within weeks on the progress of the mayor’s Welcoming Pittsburgh initiative to woo more immigrants
http://www.post-gazette.com/local/city/2...ates-for-Pittsburgh/stories/201505210043
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12920  
Old Posted May 22, 2015, 4:18 PM
eschaton eschaton is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 5,634
Quote:
Originally Posted by photoLith View Post
Some not good news.
It was clear this was going to happen, since City population estimates are mostly calculated by dividing the county population estimates by the percentage of county population in a city. This is only modified by the number of building permits which are reported to the census. And for whatever reason, Pittsburgh reported zero multiple-unit buildings being constructed between 2005 and 2013, even though that was manifestly not true.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:11 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.