Quote:
Originally Posted by ethereal_reality
illegally subdivided, as in 400 10x10 lots!
__
|
Thanks for filling in the vast gaps in my knowledge about the forbidden area beyond the gate. I now wish I'd been bolder as a child, so I could have seen the lodge while it was still there.
400 10-by-10 foot lots, eh? I wonder what that was all about? I guess it could have been simply for camping and the like, a little base of operations from which to utilize all the amenities available there.
It is an odd arrangement, however. One question that immediately comes to my mind: if this was just for camping, why
sell the plots? Who would want to buy such a tiny piece of land just to hang out on? This causes me to suspect that there was something more here than meets the eye.
It occurs to me that there are two distinct features to this setup. Firstly, when the owner sets up a tent on his plot, once inside he would have the full protection of the Fourth Amendment: probable cause, search and seizure, all that good stuff. Secondly, whatever happens in that tent, Mountain Oaks is not liable for it legally.
What I see here is a fairly safe place to indulge in a little illegal imbibing.
It would have been a nice setup for this. Mountain Oaks would provide the place, the amenities, and I would imagine some advance warning of police activity. The property owners themselves would provide the liquor.
Of course, this is just a supposition, but it's the only way this setup makes any real sense to me.