HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive


    Central Park Tower in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • New York Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location
New York Projects & Construction Forum

 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #3101  
Old Posted May 11, 2015, 5:41 AM
ILNY ILNY is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,748
5.10.15

Looking North. Another month or two at most and construction will reach street level. Notice bases for 2 cranes.

[/url]


Looking South.

     
     
  #3102  
Old Posted May 11, 2015, 1:03 PM
dendenden's Avatar
dendenden dendenden is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Denver
Posts: 82
     
     
  #3103  
Old Posted May 11, 2015, 1:48 PM
Ploppalopp Ploppalopp is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 161
Hell yeah!!

1795 to the tip of spire
1530 to top of roof
     
     
  #3104  
Old Posted May 11, 2015, 1:59 PM
yankeesfan1000 yankeesfan1000 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: 10014
Posts: 1,618
Rending from YIMBY that I haven't seen before:

     
     
  #3105  
Old Posted May 11, 2015, 3:22 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 56,961
I've been out of town, but I've seen there's been a height increase...

http://therealdeal.com/blog/2015/05/11/extells-nordstrom-tower-could-rise-higher-than-1-wtc/

Oh, there it is above.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
     
     
  #3106  
Old Posted May 11, 2015, 3:33 PM
Roadcruiser1's Avatar
Roadcruiser1 Roadcruiser1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: New York City
Posts: 2,117
The new redesign makes it look almost similar to the Sears (Willis) Tower.
     
     
  #3107  
Old Posted May 11, 2015, 4:39 PM
forj's Avatar
forj forj is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 312
wow so they tacked 21 feet onto total height? i guess they decided to just say screw keeping it respectfully 1 foot lower than WTC.. which is good because there is really no reason for that. and 1530 roof height! so a whole 80 feet taller than Willis Tower roof. this thing is a beast!
     
     
  #3108  
Old Posted May 11, 2015, 4:53 PM
Onn Onn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: The United States
Posts: 1,937
Quote:
Originally Posted by forj View Post
wow so they tacked 21 feet onto total height? i guess they decided to just say screw keeping it respectfully 1 foot lower than WTC.. which is good because there is really no reason for that. and 1530 roof height! so a whole 80 feet taller than Willis Tower roof. this thing is a beast!
It seems Barnett knows the gravity of the situation. In fact he may have been throwing out phony information all along to throw people off the tack. When the final numbers come in the tower could actually be 1,805 feet tall.

This is probably good for Nordstrom as well. Now they can say they have the newest department store in the county's tallest building.
     
     
  #3109  
Old Posted May 11, 2015, 5:40 PM
photoLith's Avatar
photoLith photoLith is offline
Ex Houstonian
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Pittsburgh n’ at
Posts: 15,994
Sweet, Im glad they are breaking that stupid 1776 limit.
__________________
Kill your lawn
     
     
  #3110  
Old Posted May 11, 2015, 5:59 PM
ChiTownWonder's Avatar
ChiTownWonder ChiTownWonder is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 618
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadcruiser1 View Post
The new redesign makes it look almost similar to the Sears (Willis) Tower.
I would say it looks more like a taller Bloomberg tower IMO
     
     
  #3111  
Old Posted May 11, 2015, 8:13 PM
aaron38's Avatar
aaron38 aaron38 is offline
312
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Palatine
Posts: 4,341
The other designs in that part of town have been so good about not putting fake antennas on top. What gives? What is it about a sensible flat roof that just screams out "Great, now put a functionless 265 foot pole on top"?
     
     
  #3112  
Old Posted May 11, 2015, 9:12 PM
Zapatan's Avatar
Zapatan Zapatan is offline
DENNAB
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NY - Cali
Posts: 6,815
Sweetness!

A real 1,500 footer... and it will deservedly be the tallest in the world outside Asia!

I wonder if the floor count also increased?

     
     
  #3113  
Old Posted May 11, 2015, 9:25 PM
forj's Avatar
forj forj is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 312
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zapatan View Post
Sweetness!

A real 1,500 footer... and it will deservedly be the tallest in the world outside Asia!

I wonder if the floor count also increased?

damn.. that is something.

Also i think as far as antenna/spires go, this one is pretty good. it has some design to it and is pretty substantial.. doesnt really bother me.. that 1530 ft. number is what im really happy about
     
     
  #3114  
Old Posted May 11, 2015, 9:38 PM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Great State of NJ
Posts: 49,381
Told yall.
     
     
  #3115  
Old Posted May 11, 2015, 9:44 PM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Great State of NJ
Posts: 49,381
Quote:
Originally Posted by forj View Post
damn.. that is something.

Also i think as far as antenna/spires go, this one is pretty good. it has some design to it and is pretty substantial.. doesnt really bother me.. that 1530 ft. number is what im really happy about
Its a good day in U.S. skyscraper city. Not only spire but roof.

A prayer I made up:

Our father (gary barnett) who art in Time Warner
Hallow be thy name
The NYC come
Thy will rise
on earth as it is to city
Give us our daily skyscraper
and forgive those who are nimbys
as we forgive those who use shadows against us
and lead us not into the abyss
but deliver us from NIMBYism

Amen
     
     
  #3116  
Old Posted May 11, 2015, 9:56 PM
mrnyc mrnyc is offline
cle/west village/shaolin
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 15,383
im glad they broke the symbolic wtc height, but the floor height is the thing here.
     
     
  #3117  
Old Posted May 11, 2015, 10:07 PM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Great State of NJ
Posts: 49,381
Seems like its more to keep the spire proportions at the right level versus making it longer and keeping the roof the same.

With clearer renderings, it also appears quite bulky which is a plus I think. Surely it will dominate all. Visually from a far, with the elevation, it will be closer to 1900 feet. As viewed from lets say nearby Hoboken.
     
     
  #3118  
Old Posted May 11, 2015, 10:10 PM
jayden jayden is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: JERSEY
Posts: 1,600
Quote:
Originally Posted by yankeesfan1000 View Post
Rending from YIMBY that I haven't seen before:

That's an incredible looking building.

As for the new height, I'm indifferent at this point. Even if it will officially surpass 1WTC in both roof height and to the pinnacle, 1WTC will always be the more iconic of the two.

And if there were to be another building to do it, what better place than the best city in the world?!?
     
     
  #3119  
Old Posted May 11, 2015, 11:03 PM
aquablue aquablue is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,737
Quote:
Originally Posted by jayden View Post
That's an incredible looking building.

As for the new height, I'm indifferent at this point. Even if it will officially surpass 1WTC in both roof height and to the pinnacle, 1WTC will always be the more iconic of the two.

And if there were to be another building to do it, what better place than the best city in the world?!?
The height increase makes this tower a beast indeed. I think you are right, the design is not iconic like WTC1 at all, having really only it's height as it's primary attribute. It is a massive tower with a rather mediocre design surrounded by more iconic towers. I am annoyed that they didn't go with something less boxy as this appears like a throwback design. WTC has an iconic monumental form and interesting geometry. Here, though the glass looks like it could redeem the dull massing perhaps, it does look pretty well done. Although it is exciting to have the tallest tower, i am not sure it will be a hit with the public as it appears rather generic - like a bloomberg tower on steroids or a spruced up 70's box.

Also, the TWC center looks like such a missed opportunity to have built both a better design and a taller one. It looks like a baby tree in the forest of giants.

Last edited by aquablue; May 11, 2015 at 11:17 PM.
     
     
  #3120  
Old Posted May 11, 2015, 11:07 PM
hunser's Avatar
hunser hunser is offline
don't *meddle*...
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: New York City / Wien
Posts: 4,016
Add the 80ft EL, and you'll get ~ 1,900 footer.

Finally we'll have a new tallest, by spire and roof height. So glad Barnett decided to go taller than 1WTC. Now I want a 2,000 footer ... Hudson Yards, Midtown East?

Exciting Times!

EDIT: The thread title NEW YORK | 1,795 FT pinnacle / 1,530 FT roof would have been labeled as VISION or FANTASY just a few years ago.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:26 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.