Posted Apr 30, 2015, 4:42 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,724
|
|
1. PHYFlyer11 - Yes, it would've been ideal for the RFP to have split up the assemblage into smaller parcels; trying to manufacture a neighborhood through one developer/development is a lot riskier, and yes, there is the risk that a huge megadevelopment is built. Did you see the conceptual renderings for the site that I posted? The City hired a consultant to create ~4 schemes based on market research of what the best use of the land is. All had a great variety of residential options (townhomes, midrise apartments, low income housing, etc.), with retail shown on Fillmore, and 3/4 showed a school on-site. More importantly, they all provided ways to break the super-block up through a street and pedestrian paseo... which is definitely a mandatory for any potential bid IMO.
2. That's great news about the stores opening in 111 W Monroe - the coffee shop, vintage retail, and music shop. Monroe is a fairly urban street compared to most, and this will extend that west of 1st Ave a bit, which is great given the future potential in that area with the Church and Welnick Bros renovation projects. Hopefully, this will have a positive impact on the retail vacancies surrounding it: the 2 spaces in the VB/1st Ave garage, 1 space at 44 Monroe, and several (3?) at the US Bank Tower.
The best part is that these are exactly the kind of stores that a downtown needs. A downtown filled with restaurants and bars is better than a ghost town, but it still leaves huge gaps in the liveability factor for residents.
|