HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #381  
Old Posted Feb 26, 2015, 9:45 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,790
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #382  
Old Posted Feb 26, 2015, 10:30 PM
squeezied's Avatar
squeezied squeezied is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,625
Thanks, here's the application: http://former.vancouver.ca/commsvcs/planning/rezoning/applications/7516-7550cambie/index.htm

I like the staggered look of it. But I thought it's required that there's a setback beyond the 4th floor. I don't know if the city will make an exception for this. Also the FSR for this project is 2.9, whereas the suggested FSR is 2.0 to 2.5 according the Cambie Corridor Plan. It seems like the applicant is being quite aggressive.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #383  
Old Posted Feb 28, 2015, 5:38 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,790
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #384  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2015, 7:38 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,790
Brick is going up on Empire.

Pic by me today:

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #385  
Old Posted Mar 24, 2015, 6:54 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,790
Article on the sale of the former gas station site at Cambie & 41st - slated for a 12 storey building.

http://www.vancourier.com/real-estate/vacant-lot-sells-for-15-8m-on-cambie-street-1.1800039
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #386  
Old Posted Mar 27, 2015, 10:10 PM
webster webster is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 72
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
Article on the sale of the former gas station site at Cambie & 41st - slated for a 12 storey building.

http://www.vancourier.com/real-estate/vacant-lot-sells-for-15-8m-on-cambie-street-1.1800039
not the best research in that article. That site is designated for up to 4 FSR, which would equate to $251 per buildable, not $407 as stated in the article. Sounds like the guy at Colliers doesn't know what he's talking about. Still overpaid, but not as bad as it sounds....
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #387  
Old Posted Apr 6, 2015, 6:47 PM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,408
It's incredible how many development proposal signs are up along Cambie Street. My estimate is that almost one third of all the properties along the whole stretch of Cambie has been sold! It's quite remarkable how much this long corridor will be changing in a matter of few years.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #388  
Old Posted Apr 6, 2015, 7:47 PM
SFUVancouver's Avatar
SFUVancouver SFUVancouver is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 6,728
I'm simultaneously pleased beyond measure and disappointed with the Cambie Corridor.

I'm over the moon that the introduction of rapid transit has been followed on with such enthusiastic development activity in the cities and jurisdictions in which it operates. It's worth remembering that the line has only been open for 5 years and yet we have significant development in the pipeline in Richmond, on Sea Island at YVR, and in the City of Vancouver.

Richmond has oriented the majority of its municipal development trajectory to leverage the line. The long-term benefits of this development direction will pay long-term dividends to the residents and businesses, who benefit not only from easy access to reliable and high-quality rapid transit, but also from a contiguous, high-quality public realm and mixed-use linear residential neighbourhood along Number 3 Road. Richmond is also actively pursuing the developer-funded development of the 'future' Capstan Way station thanks to the mega development of Concord Pacific and Pinnacle International's Capstan way developments, and proximity to other large-parcel future developments that will pay DCCs to the City to reimburse the City's advancing of the difference between Capstan Way's cost and the Pinnacle and Concord's DCC contributions. All along the line in Richmond there is active development, both in the pipe line and under construction. The big plays will be the incremental infill redevelopment of Lansdown Mall and Richmond Centre, along with *many* redevelopment opportunities for the strip malls, freestanding properties, and the corridor(s) linking Number 3 Road to the Olympic Oval precinct.

At YVR, the current development of the transit-accessible McArthurGlen designer outlet mall will put upwards of a 1,000 new jobs on a SkyTrain line and help the region staunch some of the leakage of retail dollars south to the US. The airport also has realized substantial long-term strategic flexibility to the develop the terminal and MRO precincts of the airport by being able to relocate long-term parking to the extremities of the airport. In time, the eastern taxiway linking the north and south runways will be possible to pursue as a direct result of YVR having enough 'skin in the game' with its $300m investment in the line to ensure that the Canada Line right of way was built where it needed to be and at the elevation it needed to be to not inhibit its aircraft movement system goals. When the next round of terminal expansion occurs, a dedicated US trans-border terminal, I believe, it will be grafted on to the eastern end of the US trans-border hall and it will receive its own Canada Line Station. This was foreseen and the elevated single-track line planned accordingly.

In Vancouver, there is tremendous activity to assemble properties and bring them to market for redevelopment and numerous projects are under construction of nearing completion. From the Marine Drive station developments, including PCI's Marine Gateway and Intracorp's MC2 development, to Onni's forthcoming Northwest(?) project and the Concord Gardens development, to the next round of projects that will follow on, including the Buddhists redevelopment of their site on the southwest corner of the intersection that will fund the (re)development of a new Buddhist complex a block further north on Cambie.

At 57th Avenue, where a 'future' station was roughed in, a Concert-led joint venture with the Peterson Group (and likely Westbank) has bought the 8.4 hectare Langara Gardens site, which will be redeveloped and partially/fully fund the construction of the station.

At Langara-49th, the ongoing intensification of Langara College is made possible, in part, by the presence of the Canada Line and the need to provide less student parking per capita than would have been required in the absence of the line. Residential development along Cambie heading north towards Oakridge is proceeding quickly and the first project to have moved through to completion set a high bar for the quality of product that we can expect, plus that project, the name of which escapes me, created a valuable new mid-block pedestrian corridor through to the nearby park and set precedent for activating the lane with townhouse development.

At Oakridge-41st station, what can you say? One of the largest urban redevelopment and intensification projects in the country is moving forward with the heavyweights of the local real estate development community partnering with the national heavyweight for commercial real estate working together to create what will charitably be called a paradigm shift to the mall and the immediate neigbourhood. Not only has development already occurred on 41st, delivering needed seniors' housing in a modern, high-quality, tall-mid-rise built form, but the long-expected redevelopment of the Translink-owned former Oakridge bus 'barn' yard is proceeding through the conceptual planning and rezoning process. This will deliver far, far more value to Translink when it sells the entitled development-ready land, and further anchor redevelopment along the remaining sites of 41st avenue in the Canada Line sphere of influence.

Heading north to the future 33rd Avenue station, the redevelopment path for the RCMP lands, where the 'E' Division headquarters was formerly located, is clearly a high-density Arbutus Lands-like form of development, similar to the scale and density of the Oakridge Bus barn project. The major reinvestment in the BC Womens' and Childrens' hospital is a further driver of real-estate investment in its sphere of influence, and a strong trip generator for the future station.

The King Edward station precinct has also seen a lot of activity on both King Edward and Cambie, south of King Edward. The protection for the existing housing stock of residential buildings along Cambie is important to prevent displacement of a large number of renters, however in time these will reach the end of their lives and the presence of the station in modest proximity will help support their expeditious redevelopment.

The Canada Line-induced redevelopment on Cambie between Broadway and 6th Avenue has had a transformative effect on the vibrancy and pedestrian activity of the street. The game-changing promise of the Broadway extension of the Millennium line would likely be accompanied by a Cambie Corridor-like revision of the zoning and scale of the Broadway Corridor, triggering a major redevelopment wave. The Cambie and Broadway nexus of the lines will drive up land values and development expectations for the precinct and likely compel the assembly and redevelopment of persistently low-density blocks and leave the corridor forever changed.

With all of that said, my frustration with the corridor is that it is still so overwhelmingly weighted towards residential development. With the exception of islands of employment at Oakridge, Langara College, and Marine Drive, there is barely any retail, let alone significant office and institutional uses, along the corridor. This is a tremendous missed opportunity, and one that forfeits developing a new Broadway-like major healthcare employment corridor in the vicinity of BC Womens' and Childrens hospitals, and the creation of vibrant Cambie Village-like mixed-use retail corridors in between the more intense station nodes at Oakridge and Marine Drive stations. The Urban Design Panel argued strongly for retail (at least) and preferably office and institutional uses in the Cambie Corridor plan during the City's workshops with the UDP. It was acknowledged as a desirable goal, but it was felt that 'choice of use' at grade for large sections of the corridor would be sufficient. Not surprisingly, *none* of the 'choice of use' segments of the Cambie Corridor have included retail at grade. The closest thing has been live-work at grade, but you can count on one hand the number places in the city where live-work at grade has yielded quasi-retail streets.

The absence of a station at 16th Avenue is also a tragically missed opportunity, though that ship sailed long before the City got into gear for its Cambie Corridor plan. The gap between Broadway (9th Avenue) and King Edward (25th Avenue) is similar to the gaps between King Edward and 41st, 49th Avenue and Marine Drive, and Bridgeport Station and Aberdeen Station, yet all three of those had roughed-in 'future' stations at the logical midway points. The topography of a 16th Avenue station would have been challenging, but the moderately-high population density (*lots* of townhouses and apartments to the west), presence in the midst of Cambie Village, and redevelopment potential of the east side of Cambie between 12th Avenue and 16th and the large tracts of land in the vicinity of the Greek Orthodox church to the west of the 'Portico' development all mean that a station there would be viable and spatially equitable in the context of station spacing along the line.
__________________
VANCOUVER | Beautiful, Multicultural | Canada's Pacific Metropolis
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #389  
Old Posted Apr 6, 2015, 9:01 PM
djh djh is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,978
^ Excellent analysis. SFU. The pros and the cons here are well weighed-up. Sounds like you were writing a market analysis report!

One benefit of not adding retail in the developments between Cambie Village and Oakridge is that (hopefully) this will strengthen and focus the growth of new and existing retail in the limited supply in Cambie Village. I've noticed the available lease spaces falling in the last 6 months as new retailers enter the area.

Having said that, I think every neighbourhood - or even, every walking-distance - needs a tiny spurt of retail, and that really should be included in every stretch of redevelopment longer than, say, a handful of blocks. Just so that the locals can get their fixes - bread &milk, coffee & cigarettes, beer & wine, whatever. They all help to congeal a neighbourhood and become a meeting place for neighbours
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #390  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2015, 5:40 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,790
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #391  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2015, 6:04 PM
whatnext whatnext is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 28,062
Quote:
Originally Posted by Klazu View Post
It's incredible how many development proposal signs are up along Cambie Street. My estimate is that almost one third of all the properties along the whole stretch of Cambie has been sold! It's quite remarkable how much this long corridor will be changing in a matter of few years.
Bubble, what bubble.

When things start getting that frothy the clock is usually ticking. I was shocked to se how many resale units were already up for sale in Westbank's Marpole project at 70th & Granville. And they're still trying to peddle the unsold ones.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #392  
Old Posted Apr 12, 2015, 7:01 AM
squeezied's Avatar
squeezied squeezied is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,625
Two new applications proposed:

1) 6318-6340 Cambie Street (47th Ave and Cambie) This is a project by Integra Architecture. I believe this is their second project along the Cambie Corridor; their first one was just across the street on the west side of Cambie but was rejected and the developer eventually went with GBL (http://fortyninewest.com/). Anyways I'm liking the look of this building, probably because it's a breath of fresh air from the GBL-dominated buildings along Cambie. The scale and form is similar to the two GBL buildings across the street (ground level CRU's, buildings that 🞵🞵🞵🞵 up against each other to form a 'wall' along Cambie, similar building setbacks, etc.) on the west side of Cambie but different enough that it doesn't look like a cookie-cutter clone.

2) 6729-6769 Cambie Street (52nd Ave and Cambie) Yet another GBL project. Looks OK, just another variant of a typical GBL building.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #393  
Old Posted Apr 12, 2015, 3:05 PM
osirisboy's Avatar
osirisboy osirisboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,429
Regarding 47th/cambie, it looks like they are planning the same type of building on either side. Has there been plans for that yet?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #394  
Old Posted Apr 12, 2015, 9:23 PM
trofirhen trofirhen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,055
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by djh View Post
^ Excellent analysis. SFU. The pros and the cons here are well weighed-up. Sounds like you were writing a market analysis report!

One benefit of not adding retail in the developments between Cambie Village and Oakridge is that (hopefully) this will strengthen and focus the growth of new and existing retail in the limited supply in Cambie Village. I've noticed the available lease spaces falling in the last 6 months as new retailers enter the area.

Having said that, I think every neighbourhood - or even, every walking-distance - needs a tiny spurt of retail, and that really should be included in every stretch of redevelopment longer than, say, a handful of blocks. Just so that the locals can get their fixes - bread &milk, coffee & cigarettes, beer & wine, whatever. They all help to congeal a neighbourhood and become a meeting place for neighbours
I think that's an excellent observation. What you say is elemental to any neighbourhood planning, just about anywhere, and should be institutionalized in future planning "blueprints." Really.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #395  
Old Posted Apr 14, 2015, 8:07 PM
squeezied's Avatar
squeezied squeezied is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,625
Quote:
Originally Posted by osirisboy View Post
Regarding 47th/cambie, it looks like they are planning the same type of building on either side. Has there been plans for that yet?
I'm not sure what you mean. On the west side, Prelude has been completed and 49 West is under construction. On the east side, there's the application to redevelop two lots where I've provided link. The south side of this application is a blank wall so that the future redevelopment of the adjacent lots will 🞵🞵🞵🞵 up against the blank wall (similar to how Prelude and 49 West 🞵🞵🞵🞵 up against each other). This link show's how the east side will eventually look like: http://former.vancouver.ca/commsvcs/plan...cambie/documents/policyphotoscontext.pdf As of now there are no applications for any of the buildings in grey, they are just for context.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #396  
Old Posted Apr 14, 2015, 8:48 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,790
Quote:
Originally Posted by squeezied View Post
I'm not sure what you mean. On the west side, Prelude has been completed and 49 West is under construction. On the east side, there's the application to redevelop two lots where I've provided link. The south side of this application is a blank wall so that the future redevelopment of the adjacent lots will 🞵🞵🞵🞵 up against the blank wall (similar to how Prelude and 49 West 🞵🞵🞵🞵 up against each other). This link show's how the east side will eventually look like: http://former.vancouver.ca/commsvcs/plan...cambie/documents/policyphotoscontext.pdf As of now there are no applications for any of the buildings in grey, they are just for context.
I think he means abutting this project to the north and south.

Agreed that the Site Plan shows the project to the south sharing a courtyard - so this could be Phase 1 of a 2 phase project.
There is a row of trees along the north edge of this site, so the parcel to the north may be under separate ownership.

The Building Perspective shows similar massings on the adjacent parcels, but that could be artistic licence.

The context link you posted looks to be accurate.
Interesting that there's an "Urban Plaza" marked. I think there's station infrastructure under that parcel -
but you would have thought it could be built on.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #397  
Old Posted Apr 15, 2015, 7:30 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,790
Quote:
Vancouver’s Cambie Corridor could soon be affordable for families
Council set to approve next phase of plan

Martin MacMahon
April 15, 2015 12:08 pm

VANCOUVER (NEWS1130) – In a bid to create more affordable housing, Vancouver City Council looks set to approve a report outlining the next plan for development along the Cambie corridor.

This comes as the city hopes to create areas with a family focus.

The area, that a staff report recommends considering for development under Phase 3 of this plan, spans from 16th Avenue to the Fraser River, between Oak and Ontario streets.

City Councillor Geoff Meggs says the idea is to build more diverse housing options, although the specifics will involve consultation.

...

More than 6,500 new units were approved under Phase 3 of this plan.
http://www.news1130.com/2015/04/15/vanco...r-could-soon-be-affordable-for-families/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #398  
Old Posted Apr 17, 2015, 7:44 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,790
Langara Gardens Open House April 19th & 21st:

http://www.vancourier.com/news/langara-gardens-project-back-before-public-1.1826536

Quote:
The April 19 open house is open to Langara Gardens residents from 12 noon until 2 p.m. and to everyone from 2 until 4 p.m. It will take place at Langara Gardens social lounge at 621 West 57th Ave.
The April 21 open house, which is open to everyone, runs from 5 to 8 p.m. at Langara Golf Course Clubhouse at 6706 Alberta St.
See more at: http://www.vancourier.com/news/langara-g...re-public-1.1826536#sthash.Waetd8EE.dpuf
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #399  
Old Posted Apr 20, 2015, 2:18 PM
whatnext whatnext is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 28,062
IE they'll be tearing down nicely sized rental units in favour of tiny overpriced rentals and condos.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #400  
Old Posted Apr 20, 2015, 3:00 PM
osirisboy's Avatar
osirisboy osirisboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,429
That's good to hear! Definitely needs replacing
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:51 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.