Its unrealistic to think that all of these extra units will be starchitect quality, even of average quality. Lots of housing is going up, and not everything will be fancy.
Just drive around the city and check out the existing housing stock. Its not all glamour, especially in the outer boroughs. There are many winners, but also lots of bad architecture. With affordable housing btw, do not expect it to be stunners. Often the cheaper units come at a cost of quality. Not to say this is the case for every development, but we will not be getting the quality of lets say 15 Central Park or One57. This also applies to high rises too. Every Once in a while we get a gem, but if you;ve noticed, often they tend to be very pricey.
In terms of NYC architecture on the mid rise level, it still beats the crap out of Chinese cities. If you want to see some bad housing designs, check out some of those places. Often housing the masses comes at a cost of quality.
Quote:
Originally Posted by sparkling
It's not always about talent, if the developer tells you to design something simple and easy to construct at the lowest cost possible what choice the architect has?
|
Exactly what it is. Architects do not have the final say. Ultimately up to the developer and what they budget entails. Profit > design in their view.