HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #8121  
Old Posted Mar 30, 2015, 11:02 AM
GeeCee's Avatar
GeeCee GeeCee is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Port Coquitlam, BC
Posts: 2,816
Not sure if this has been posted but I found this:

http://www.p3canada.ca/en/about-p3s/project-map/lincoln-station-project/

Mentions a potential future second station house/access.. perhaps something subject to mall integration?
     
     
  #8122  
Old Posted Mar 30, 2015, 4:18 PM
queetz@home's Avatar
queetz@home queetz@home is offline
Go Rotem! Die Bombardier!
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Ortigas
Posts: 3,679
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeeCee View Post
Not sure if this has been posted but I found this:

http://www.p3canada.ca/en/about-p3s/project-map/lincoln-station-project/

Mentions a potential future second station house/access.. perhaps something subject to mall integration?
Just curious how Coquitlam Centre Mall can even justify expanding, at its current form, all the way to the Lincoln Station for integrating purposes after loosing not one, but two large tenants (Target and Future Shop). I know the stores are on the other side but I think the owners should use this opportunity to start rebuilding the mall and perhaps add office components here and there. Movie theatres also help...it did with Metrotown and even that New West commercial centre....
     
     
  #8123  
Old Posted Mar 30, 2015, 4:25 PM
GeeCee's Avatar
GeeCee GeeCee is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Port Coquitlam, BC
Posts: 2,816
Quote:
Originally Posted by queetz@home View Post
Just curious how Coquitlam Centre Mall can even justify expanding, at its current form, all the way to the Lincoln Station for integrating purposes after loosing not one, but two large tenants (Target and Future Shop). I know the stores are on the other side but I think the owners should use this opportunity to start rebuilding the mall and perhaps add office components here and there. Movie theatres also help...it did with Metrotown and even that New West commercial centre....
Neither one was closing at the time that the contract would have been signed but I imagine they will be redeveloping the property in a few decades. It could be something as simple as a provision for a future passerelle like Metrotown.
     
     
  #8124  
Old Posted Mar 30, 2015, 4:31 PM
queetz@home's Avatar
queetz@home queetz@home is offline
Go Rotem! Die Bombardier!
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Ortigas
Posts: 3,679
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeeCee View Post
Neither one was closing at the time that the contract would have been signed but I imagine they will be redeveloping the property in a few decades. It could be something as simple as a provision for a future passerelle like Metrotown.
I guess so. Even Brentwood took over a decade to change despite the presence of the Millenium Line...
     
     
  #8125  
Old Posted Mar 30, 2015, 5:19 PM
Tetsuo Tetsuo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,382
Quote:
Originally Posted by queetz@home View Post
Just curious how Coquitlam Centre Mall can even justify expanding, at its current form, all the way to the Lincoln Station for integrating purposes after loosing not one, but two large tenants (Target and Future Shop). I know the stores are on the other side but I think the owners should use this opportunity to start rebuilding the mall and perhaps add office components here and there. Movie theatres also help...it did with Metrotown and even that New West commercial centre....
With Silvercity's massive Schoolhouse complex I doubt they would add a movie theatre to Coquitlam Centre.

I remember Pinetree used to have a small theatre and so did Barnet down the road, they closed up shop not long after the Silvercity opened up
     
     
  #8126  
Old Posted Mar 30, 2015, 6:04 PM
TransitJack TransitJack is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 443
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tetsuo View Post
With Silvercity's massive Schoolhouse complex I doubt they would add a movie theatre to Coquitlam Centre.

I remember Pinetree used to have a small theatre and so did Barnet down the road, they closed up shop not long after the Silvercity opened up
Yup, then they tore down the old Cineplex next to the Save on Foods.

The Famous Players on Barnet was a cheap house run by FP for a while I recall.
     
     
  #8127  
Old Posted Mar 30, 2015, 8:17 PM
Kwik-E-Mart Kwik-E-Mart is offline
A.H.-Ha!
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Cambie Village, Van City
Posts: 348
Regarding developments around SkyTrain stations, the major difference between the current Millennium Line and the Evergreen Extension is the lack of high-rises along most stations along the former - save for Lougheed Town Centre. We have definitely learned from it, and that's why we are seeing high rises blossoming along Burquitlam, Inlet Centre, and the Lincoln-Lafarge Lake corridor before the Evergreen Extension is built.

The parking spots @ Coquitlam Centre will be gradually redeveloped over the next decade or so, just like the many of you have mentioned.

An add on: The importance of a one-seat ride to Vancouver was the crucial factor in the decision to adopt SkyTrain over LRT. Otherwise, riders at Lougheed would've mostly headed to Vancouver via the Expo Line along Braid-Sapperton because they save a second transfer at Commercial-Broadway. I don't need to explain more about putting additional strain to the already-crowded Expo Line.

With the completion of the Evergreen Extension, travelers to Downtown Vancouver/UBC/Central Broadway only need to transfer once - at Commercial-Broadway. I am sure there will be a lot more people taking the Millennium Line given the benefits. That's why I am more optimistic about the ridership figures once the train starts rolling from Lafarge Lake-Douglas.

A one-transfer SkyTrain ride from Coquitlam Centre to YVR will become reality with the Broadway Subway to Vancouver City Hall - something I really look forward to.
     
     
  #8128  
Old Posted Mar 30, 2015, 9:03 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,478
Quote:
Originally Posted by queetz@home View Post
I guess so. Even Brentwood took over a decade to change despite the presence of the Millenium Line...
I think that was the result of a change in ownership from 20 Vic Management to Shape Properties.
Coquitlam Centre is owned by Morguard.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kwik-E-Mart View Post
Regarding developments around SkyTrain stations, the major difference between the current Millennium Line and the Evergreen Extension is the lack of high-rises along most stations along the former - save for Lougheed Town Centre. We have definitely learned from it, and that's why we are seeing high rises blossoming along Burquitlam, Inlet Centre, and the Lincoln-Lafarge Lake corridor before the Evergreen Extension is built.
That's also the result of zoning.
In Vancouver Renfrew and Rupert are in light industrial areas - so office parks are the preferred use.
Same for Lake City and Production Way in Burnaby.
     
     
  #8129  
Old Posted Mar 30, 2015, 10:18 PM
queetz@home's Avatar
queetz@home queetz@home is offline
Go Rotem! Die Bombardier!
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Ortigas
Posts: 3,679
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tetsuo View Post
With Silvercity's massive Schoolhouse complex I doubt they would add a movie theatre to Coquitlam Centre.

I remember Pinetree used to have a small theatre and so did Barnet down the road, they closed up shop not long after the Silvercity opened up
The thing is with the Evergreen Line, won't Coquitlam Centre be a better choice to put the movie theatres? Going to Schoolhouse can be a nitemare often times since its so hard to get parking if there are lots of hit movies being shown.
     
     
  #8130  
Old Posted Mar 30, 2015, 11:28 PM
SOSS SOSS is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 661
Quote:
Originally Posted by queetz@home View Post
The thing is with the Evergreen Line, won't Coquitlam Centre be a better choice to put the movie theatres? Going to Schoolhouse can be a nitemare often times since its so hard to get parking if there are lots of hit movies being shown.
I agree this would be a good location for a theatre. Wouldn't Future Shop location get rebranded as Best Buy since its a better location than the existing Best Buy? Also, since Target borders a hallway the entire length of its section of the mall, I wouldn't be surprised if the mall gets redeveloped to have multiple tenants in that location instead of a single anchor tenant.
     
     
  #8131  
Old Posted Mar 31, 2015, 12:30 AM
GeeCee's Avatar
GeeCee GeeCee is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Port Coquitlam, BC
Posts: 2,816
Quote:
Originally Posted by SOSS View Post
I agree this would be a good location for a theatre. Wouldn't Future Shop location get rebranded as Best Buy since its a better location than the existing Best Buy? Also, since Target borders a hallway the entire length of its section of the mall, I wouldn't be surprised if the mall gets redeveloped to have multiple tenants in that location instead of a single anchor tenant.
That Future Shop always seemed fairly empty.. the nearby Best Buy might not be in the mall but it has the advantage of the building being visible from Lincoln Station. Cross to the opposite corner of the sidewalk and you're in the parking lot. There's no easy pedestrian access to where Future Shop was, at least not until they build a pedestrian overpass from Coquitlam Station.
     
     
  #8132  
Old Posted Apr 1, 2015, 10:02 PM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 39,973


Evergreen Line Rapid Transit Project
Page Liked · 4 hrs ·


Along the left wall of the tunnel are power cables, grout feeder pipelines and a walkway for work crews.


Evergreen Line Rapid Transit Project
Page Liked · 4 hrs ·


This shot looking back at the start of the bored tunnel shows the spoils handling conveyer belt and the fresh air intake tube along the top of the tunnel.
__________________
belowitall
     
     
  #8133  
Old Posted Apr 1, 2015, 10:14 PM
CanSpice's Avatar
CanSpice CanSpice is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: New Westminster, BC
Posts: 2,708
I'm trying to figure out if the Evergreen Line will make it quicker for me to get to Coquitlam Station than I currently can from the middle of New Westminster. Suppose I'm leaving from Braid Station. Currently I can take the 169, which goes straight up Lougheed, and it takes roughly 20 minutes (as long as it's not the route that goes through Riverview Hospital, that adds another five minutes). With the Evergreen Line, I'd have to catch a SkyTrain to Lougheed (3 minutes), transfer to an Evergreen Line, then take the SkyTrain to Coquitlam Station (15 minutes).

It looks like it's a wash, assuming the transfer at Lougheed takes two minutes. And I guess the SkyTrain is more reliable, with fewer delays than the bus because of traffic or accidents on Lougheed...
     
     
  #8134  
Old Posted Apr 2, 2015, 12:12 AM
queetz@home's Avatar
queetz@home queetz@home is offline
Go Rotem! Die Bombardier!
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Ortigas
Posts: 3,679
Quote:
Originally Posted by CanSpice View Post
I'm trying to figure out if the Evergreen Line will make it quicker for me to get to Coquitlam Station than I currently can from the middle of New Westminster. Suppose I'm leaving from Braid Station. Currently I can take the 169, which goes straight up Lougheed, and it takes roughly 20 minutes (as long as it's not the route that goes through Riverview Hospital, that adds another five minutes). With the Evergreen Line, I'd have to catch a SkyTrain to Lougheed (3 minutes), transfer to an Evergreen Line, then take the SkyTrain to Coquitlam Station (15 minutes).

It looks like it's a wash, assuming the transfer at Lougheed takes two minutes. And I guess the SkyTrain is more reliable, with fewer delays than the bus because of traffic or accidents on Lougheed...
This is the difference between someone who looks at a map with schedules and says Translink is efficient vs someone who actually uses the system and experiences the inefficiency themselves. Believe me, it will NOT take you 20 minutes to use the 169. The Brunette bottleneck is pretty much a permanent barrier of the 169 route due to the way its designed and the amount of vehicular traffic that needs to use it.

In order for the 169 to make its 20 minute schedule, it will need to somehow pass through all the stop lights starting from Brunette to Braid, and that stretch alone has what? Four? Then there shouldn't be any slow vehicles (i.e. trucks with trailers) around, which is next to impossible given the major industrial hub in the area. Evergreen Line from the point of view of the user, will always be faster than the 169 in all but the most extreme circumstances (only if Skytrain breaks down will it be slower).
     
     
  #8135  
Old Posted Apr 2, 2015, 12:40 AM
aberdeen5698's Avatar
aberdeen5698 aberdeen5698 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 4,772
Quote:
Originally Posted by queetz@home View Post
This is the difference between someone who looks at a map with schedules and says Translink is efficient vs someone who actually uses the system and experiences the inefficiency themselves. Believe me, it will NOT take you 20 minutes to use the 169. The Brunette bottleneck is pretty much a permanent barrier of the 169 route due to the way its designed and the amount of vehicular traffic that needs to use it.
The other big problem that people who plan by timetable often miss is frequency. With Skytrain frequencies you can usually figure on an average wait time of only a couple of minutes. I see that the 169 bus only runs every 15 minutes, so on average you can expect to wait 7 or 8 minutes for the bus - a penalty of about 5 minutes or more before you even get to the point of comparing the travel times.
     
     
  #8136  
Old Posted Apr 2, 2015, 12:52 AM
nname nname is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,071
I used to take 169 daily, and the trip can take anywhere from 10 to 25 minutes on a normal day. This was before the PMH1 construction, which resulted in a permanent 2-3 min added to the route.

However, the longest trip I had on the 169 is about 1 hour wait plus 2.5 hours on the bus. Even the worse SkyTrain breakdown is nowhere as bad as this.
     
     
  #8137  
Old Posted Apr 2, 2015, 4:44 PM
CanSpice's Avatar
CanSpice CanSpice is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: New Westminster, BC
Posts: 2,708
Quote:
Originally Posted by queetz@home View Post
This is the difference between someone who looks at a map with schedules and says Translink is efficient vs someone who actually uses the system and experiences the inefficiency themselves. Believe me, it will NOT take you 20 minutes to use the 169. The Brunette bottleneck is pretty much a permanent barrier of the 169 route due to the way its designed and the amount of vehicular traffic that needs to use it.

In order for the 169 to make its 20 minute schedule, it will need to somehow pass through all the stop lights starting from Brunette to Braid, and that stretch alone has what? Four? Then there shouldn't be any slow vehicles (i.e. trucks with trailers) around, which is next to impossible given the major industrial hub in the area. Evergreen Line from the point of view of the user, will always be faster than the 169 in all but the most extreme circumstances (only if Skytrain breaks down will it be slower).
The last time I took the 169 from Braid to Coquitlam was Monday, March 23. It took 19 minutes. Here's my tracking map of the trip. That was during the morning rush, leaving Braid at 8:34.

So please, tell me again how I only looked at the schedules and maps and don't use the system, and how it won't take 20 minutes to use the 169?
     
     
  #8138  
Old Posted Apr 2, 2015, 10:17 PM
Tfreder Tfreder is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 225
Good point regarding the difference in speed between the 169 and the Evergreen Line. From what I remember, to address this issue Translink is planning to add more stops along Lougheed for the 169. Unfortunately I can't manage to track down the original source right now, but this news article mentions Translink wanting to increase the number of stops. However, I have no idea how much time this will add to the trip.

So the Evergreen line will most likely be the fastest way to get to Coquitlam Station.
     
     
  #8139  
Old Posted Apr 2, 2015, 11:25 PM
Kwik-E-Mart Kwik-E-Mart is offline
A.H.-Ha!
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Cambie Village, Van City
Posts: 348
Quote:
Originally Posted by CanSpice View Post
The last time I took the 169 from Braid to Coquitlam was Monday, March 23. It took 19 minutes. Here's my tracking map of the trip. That was during the morning rush, leaving Braid at 8:34.

So please, tell me again how I only looked at the schedules and maps and don't use the system, and how it won't take 20 minutes to use the 169?
Isn't that traveling in reverse of the morning rush hour traffic, which is from east to west instead of the other way around? Of course your trip would be faster.

Also, the main point of the Evergreen Extension is for faster travel to Vancouver (not just Downtown).
     
     
  #8140  
Old Posted Apr 2, 2015, 11:32 PM
GlassCity's Avatar
GlassCity GlassCity is offline
Rational urbanist
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Metro Vancouver
Posts: 5,270
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tfreder View Post
Good point regarding the difference in speed between the 169 and the Evergreen Line. From what I remember, to address this issue Translink is planning to add more stops along Lougheed for the 169. Unfortunately I can't manage to track down the original source right now, but this news article mentions Translink wanting to increase the number of stops. However, I have no idea how much time this will add to the trip.

So the Evergreen line will most likely be the fastest way to get to Coquitlam Station.
They will in fact be adding stops on the 169, here's the source:

     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:07 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.