Quote:
Originally Posted by jigglysquishy
I don't see making College as a non-freeway as a big deal. It's unreasonable to expect no-lights on a busy road from Preston to city limits. There aren't enough intersections to handle the incoming traffic. And the cost to build those interchanges is too high for the city to handle.
|
Allowing traffic signals for intersections with connector roads essentially downgrades College Dr from an expressway to an arterial corridor. This would be a big blunder East of Circle Dr. College Dr and Circle Dr is soon (if not already) going to handle the traffic volume of a freeway to freeway intersection, and right now there is a big bottleneck from EB to NB traffic at Central Ave. Intersections for Holmwood would add a bottleneck to WB traffic as well.
The amount of traffic heading into and out of Holmwood needs to be handled by a hierarchal network, the solution is not more traffic signals, it's higher capacity arterials in the neighborhood with an efficient interchange to the high speed freeway. Think of it like the respiratory system - the trachea is your freeway, the primary and secondary bronchi are your expressways and arterials, the tertiary bronchi are your collectors and your bronchioles are your locals. Keeping the freeway flowing is the most crucial part of a road network, NEXT you worry about how people get onto the freeway, and so forth.