HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #221  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2015, 10:00 PM
logan5's Avatar
logan5 logan5 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Mt.Pleasant - The New Downtown South
Posts: 8,178
Quote:
Originally Posted by Echoes View Post
It's been a tough week in Saskatoon for demolitions.

The 103 year old Farnam Block, a Broadway Avenue landmark, has a date with the wrecking ball today. Joni Mitchell played here early in her career. The building most recently hosted Lydia's Pub, which occupied all 3 floors, and was a staple of Broadway and the city's live music scene.

They couldn't even save the facade? The building that replaces this one will not even come close to matching that level of architecture. More giant sheets of glass.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #222  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2015, 11:38 PM
crooked rain's Avatar
crooked rain crooked rain is offline
Calgarian
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Wonderbread City
Posts: 1,547
That's a landmark of Saskatoon. What a shame!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #223  
Old Posted Mar 17, 2015, 3:16 PM
Echoes's Avatar
Echoes Echoes is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Saskatoon, SK
Posts: 4,531
RIP Farnam Block



Concert posters in the bar's green room still plaster the walls:



http://www.thestarphoenix.com/news/saskatoon/Lydia+demolition+begins/10894909/story.html

My heart is heavy today.
__________________
SASKATOON PHOTO TOURS
2013: [Part I] [Part II] | [2014] | [2016] | [2022-26]
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #224  
Old Posted Mar 17, 2015, 3:59 PM
flar's Avatar
flar flar is offline
..........
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Southwestern Ontario
Posts: 15,760
"Perserving some elements", lol. Classic.

There are always "structural" problems with buildings that someone wants to tear down.

Anybody can find a two-bit inspector to tell them it's about to collapse.

Where there's a will there's a way. ANY building can be fixed up, but it will always be more difficult and usually cost more than knocking it down and starting fresh.
__________________
RECENT PHOTOS:
TORONTO • SAN FRANCISCO • ROCHESTER, NY • HAMILTON • GODERICH, ON • WHEATLEY, ON • COBOURG, ON • LAS VEGAS • LOS ANGELES
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #225  
Old Posted Mar 17, 2015, 7:54 PM
The_Architect's Avatar
The_Architect The_Architect is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 3,385
Quote:
Originally Posted by flar View Post
There are always "structural" problems with buildings that someone wants to tear down.

Anybody can find a two-bit inspector to tell them it's about to collapse.
...or neglect it until a wall collapses and then as soon as the city is going to make them fix it up they hire someone to burn it down so they can develop it as a condo.

/still bitter
__________________
Hope is the quintessential human delusion, simultaneously the source of our greatest strength, and our greatest weakness.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #226  
Old Posted Mar 17, 2015, 8:16 PM
lio45 lio45 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Quebec
Posts: 44,901
Good for Saskatoon that it has so many nicer and older buildings than this that it can easily give up one of its lesser ones. Well, that's my guess.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #227  
Old Posted Mar 23, 2015, 10:31 PM
SignalHillHiker's Avatar
SignalHillHiker SignalHillHiker is offline
I ♣ Baby Seals
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Sin Jaaawnz, Newf'nland
Posts: 36,320
This morning:



This afternoon:



Legal loophole tied the City's hands and a developer was allowed to purchase the property, which he demolished ASAP because the uproar about the sale has been fierce here. He didn't even allow heritage organizations to map the floor plan, photograph the interior, or salvage the ornate interior/exterior woodwork.

130 years old. RIP, Quinnipiac. Ironically, former home to one of the founders of the heritage preservation movement here.

Its two-acre lot at the edge of the Old Town core will be subdivided, cul-de-sac and the works, I'm sure.
__________________
Note to self: "The plural of anecdote is not evidence."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #228  
Old Posted Mar 23, 2015, 10:34 PM
kwoldtimer kwoldtimer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: La vraie capitale
Posts: 26,250
I thought at first that you were joking. That's just terrible.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #229  
Old Posted Mar 23, 2015, 10:49 PM
osirisboy's Avatar
osirisboy osirisboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,429
What was the developers rationale??! It's 2 acres they can still sub divide and build on the land with the house still in tact. Why demolish this?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #230  
Old Posted Mar 23, 2015, 10:51 PM
SignalHillHiker's Avatar
SignalHillHiker SignalHillHiker is offline
I ♣ Baby Seals
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Sin Jaaawnz, Newf'nland
Posts: 36,320
No idea, and the sad thing is people online are blaming the City. Obviously, they failed at their role, but they were doing what they could on little notice. The home is located outside of the strictly-protected core. It's in an area where heritage designation is a voluntary, costly, and restrictive declaration homeowners have to apply for. Almost none do because it offers no support while requiring all sorts of expensive standards. The City couldn't get the former owner to declare it, and thus had no legal right to withhold approval for the demolition. They're re-assessing the heritage protection laws now to see what they can do to prevent this in the future.

The City was definitely more than willing to work with the developer to find some way to preserve the home, and people were getting pissed off. So he tore it down as fast as he could.

This is being shared widely on FB:



There was talk this morning of protesters forming a human chain around it, but that never materialized.

Advocates, Councillors Watch as Winter Avenue Historic Home Destroyed

Quote:
It's gone.

Quinnipiac, an elegant and historic home in the city's east end that had stood since the 1880s, has been torn down.

Dozens gathered at 25 Winter Avenue this morning after word started to circulate that an excavator had been brought to the site.

City council approved a demolition permit for the building earlier this month, which wasn't widely known until VOCM broke the news late last week.

Today, with no effort to preserve or even recycle the hand-carved decoration adorning the building, it was destroyed in minutes.

No 'Rant and Roar' Without This House

Quinnipiac was the late home of Fredrick Emerson. In the early 20th century, Emerson was one of the first heritage advocates in the city, recognizing the need to protect Newfoundland culture, but fearing much of it already lost.

From this house, collections of Newfoundland folk songs were compiled and published. Emerson was the driving force preserving songs like the Banks of Newfoundland and the Ryans and the Pittmans. The work performed in this building is the only reason anyone knows the phrase 'rant and roar.'

A lifelong defender of heritage, within minutes the historic home, once a shield that protected Newfoundland music and culture was gone.
http://www.vocm.com/newsarticle.asp?mn=2&ID=53539

*****

And a few pictures of the interior from FB:







(Kitchens in all the preserved old homes in St. John's are generally 🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵 as they were meant only for servants)









__________________
Note to self: "The plural of anecdote is not evidence."

Last edited by SignalHillHiker; Mar 23, 2015 at 11:03 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #231  
Old Posted Mar 23, 2015, 11:38 PM
lio45 lio45 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Quebec
Posts: 44,901
...

... you're nine days early, right?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #232  
Old Posted Mar 23, 2015, 11:50 PM
kwoldtimer kwoldtimer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: La vraie capitale
Posts: 26,250
That has to be the Canadian heritage loss of the year, or at least on a very short list.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #233  
Old Posted Mar 24, 2015, 12:06 AM
Drybrain Drybrain is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 4,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by kwoldtimer View Post
That has to be the Canadian heritage loss of the year, or at least on a very short list.
That 🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵. If people are outraged about that, I hope they spare some outrage for this:



This is a registered heritage building in Halifax's only heritage conservation district, and its owner--who seems to change his mind about what to do with it every six months--has recently evicted every single tenant and announced that he plans to tear it down, no matter how long it takes to win approval.

The city's heritage bylaws are extraordinarily weak, and despite being a registered building in a conservation district, it has an owner who is actively attempting to destroy it, and is clearly not maintaining it in any significant way. So I think it's well within the realm of possibility that he'll eventually succeed, if city council doesn't get serious. Making matters worse, Halifax's only heritage-conservation lobbying group is a widely derided group of mostly elderly folks who have very little public support.

It's a massive failure of heritage preservation in an ostensibly historic city, and its loss will render the conservation district pretty meaningless.

I guess I'm going off topic since this is a restoration thread, but I was inspired by SignalHill's post...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #234  
Old Posted Mar 24, 2015, 12:12 AM
SignalHillHiker's Avatar
SignalHillHiker SignalHillHiker is offline
I ♣ Baby Seals
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Sin Jaaawnz, Newf'nland
Posts: 36,320
Oh, Drybrain, that's awful. That's a beautiful building. Reminds me of a grander version of the Commercial Chambers here.

http://www.heritage.nf.ca/society/rhs/rs_listing/108.html

And post away. We don't have very many big losses, thank God - and they don't really need a thread of their own. A post or two here or the Canadian Skylines of the Past thread should meet the need.
__________________
Note to self: "The plural of anecdote is not evidence."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #235  
Old Posted Mar 24, 2015, 12:15 AM
kwoldtimer kwoldtimer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: La vraie capitale
Posts: 26,250
You wonder what goes on in peoples minds. Here in Kitchener, the demolition of our old City Hall for a (failed) shopping mall in 1973 is still a sensitive local subject.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #236  
Old Posted Mar 24, 2015, 1:56 AM
Daveography's Avatar
Daveography Daveography is offline
Klatuu Barada Nikto
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The Island of Misfit Architecture
Posts: 4,483
Seems to me these should be in the Canadian Demolitions thread, and that this thread is for buildings being actively or recently restored.

That aside, that's just shameful. Unreal how little respect some people have for built heritage.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #237  
Old Posted Mar 24, 2015, 2:20 AM
lio45 lio45 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Quebec
Posts: 44,901
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drybrain View Post
... and its owner--who seems to change his mind about what to do with it every six months--
How much would that building sell for, out of curiosity?

(If you have no idea, but at least can give me a quick tutorial on how to look online at past sales records in NS -- which, in Canada, I know very well how to do in Quebec only -- then I may do so myself.)




From a 2009 article. That's all I cound find online about that building...

"The historic Green Lantern building on Barrington Street will not be coming down after all.

Halifax councillor Sue Uteck raised eyebrows at a recent council meeting when she said she had received an email from Green Lantern owner Jeff Webber expressing frustration with the city's historic preservation efforts. "He's given up on it, and is going to tear it down," said Uteck. The building was damaged by Hurricane Juan.

But Webber has not returned a call for comment, and city staffer Bill Plaskett says Webber's frustrations have been "smoothed over." Next month, Plaskett will be bringing a recommendation to council that outlines city financial assistance in shoring up the Green Lantern facade, and for deferred tax payments for interior renovations. Plaskett declines to give details of the proposal until council sees it, but says there's enough money available to accomplish the job.
"
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #238  
Old Posted Mar 24, 2015, 2:24 AM
O-tacular's Avatar
O-tacular O-tacular is offline
Fake News
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 26,234
Quote:
Originally Posted by SignalHillHiker View Post
This morning:



This afternoon:



Legal loophole tied the City's hands and a developer was allowed to purchase the property, which he demolished ASAP because the uproar about the sale has been fierce here. He didn't even allow heritage organizations to map the floor plan, photograph the interior, or salvage the ornate interior/exterior woodwork.

130 years old. RIP, Quinnipiac. Ironically, former home to one of the founders of the heritage preservation movement here.

Its two-acre lot at the edge of the Old Town core will be subdivided, cul-de-sac and the works, I'm sure.
Sickening!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #239  
Old Posted Mar 24, 2015, 2:32 AM
Innsertnamehere's Avatar
Innsertnamehere Innsertnamehere is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 12,884
^indeed. The interiors were what made that building too, its horrible to see something that well preserved go so quickly.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #240  
Old Posted Mar 24, 2015, 2:50 AM
Architype's Avatar
Architype Architype is offline
♒︎ verified human
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 🍁 Canada
Posts: 14,075
Quote:
Originally Posted by SignalHillHiker View Post
This morning:

http://i57.tinypic.com/11h8cjr.jpg

This afternoon:

http://i57.tinypic.com/2qatxz5.jpg

Legal loophole tied the City's hands and a developer was allowed to purchase the property, which he demolished ASAP because the uproar about the sale has been fierce here. He didn't even allow heritage organizations to map the floor plan, photograph the interior, or salvage the ornate interior/exterior woodwork.

130 years old. RIP, Quinnipiac. Ironically, former home to one of the founders of the heritage preservation movement here.

Its two-acre lot at the edge of the Old Town core will be subdivided, cul-de-sac and the works, I'm sure.
This kind of thing leaves me at a loss. Thousands of houses were relocated intact during the resettlement period in Newfoundland. The fact that this unique and significant heritage home was not just relocated to another site, as it probably would be almost anywhere else, is just reckless and wasteful. It's time to close the loopholes.

Last edited by Architype; Mar 24, 2015 at 6:35 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:06 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.