HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Mar 12, 2015, 2:55 PM
CoryB CoryB is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 6,096
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
I can understand why new residential would be prohibited directly under a flight path, but the AVDP seems to cover a substantial part of the city.
I must be missing something. I have been in other cities where the noise from the airport can easily be heard outside, to the point of being a nuisance. Through modern building methods in noise isolation you can't even hear them inside. Granted that level of noise isolation is likely above the standard code but it is possible. A limitation requiring a higher level of noise isolation in residential within the airport zone would make more sense than an outright ban.

A further question I have is how was the City not aware of this restriction when calling for proposals for the Stadium site? This really calls into question if that was done fairly and in a completely above board manner. It is even more troubling knowing it was awarded to Shindico and the other allegations they were treated favourable by the previous civic government.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:16 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.