Quote:
Originally Posted by vid
I don't see how secondary highways could be given a logical numbering scheme. They all loop around randomly in the north, things don't follow grids up here, they follow the terrain. They best they could do is probably assign a number range to the region, which we kind of already have (most secondary highways around Thunder Bay range from 585 to 597, with a few exceptions) but it's not any easier to follow than if the highways were given random numbers.
All those roads in Southern Ontario do have concession numbers even if they're named (the roads in Thunder Bay are the same), they could just co-sign those, but then the numbers change with every township so it might still be confusing. And if you start with 0 on one side of the province and work your way up you'll probably be into the 10000s by the time you hit Rockford.
|
It wouldn't have to based on the direction of the road. I don't think it really matters in an age when cars have compasses and GPS built in and signs show the cities that the roads lead to. The problem isn't the random numbering, it's the fact that the numbers change across county lines, are duplicated dozens of times, are discontinuous, etc. County Road 1 is duplicated again and again. Durham Region somehow manages to have two Regional Road 2s and they actually intersect with each other. Highway 7 intersects with at least one County Road 7. Highway 9 becomes County Road 109, then back to Highway 9 again. It's a mess.
I'm not talking about the concession roads, which are generally owned by lower tier municipalities (townships), usually gravel, and only used for very local travel. I'm talking about the numbered county and regional roads (upper tier municipalities) signed with the flowerpot shaped shields. They're basically highways, almost all are paved, and they're used for longer distance travel.
Eliminating the duplication and consolidating routes would simplify the network. A 3-digit numbering system like in Quebec could handle that easily.