HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #12901  
Old Posted Feb 3, 2015, 4:43 PM
RocketSurgeon RocketSurgeon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,037
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeorgiaPeanuts View Post
That isn't the fuqua development. Actually its 464 Bishop got the address wrong.

It is this property: http://www.loopnet.com/Listing/17321681/464-Bishop-Street-Atlanta-GA/
Ah, I assumed you meant 490 (Fuqua) which was trying to get a similar zoning change.

That's good news. The ZRB wanted to include retail or office space to keep jobs on the property... I wonder if the developer made that change or the zoning was just approved regardless.

 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ATL_J View Post
It beats an empty lot, for now, but in 10, hell even 5 years, will that insular development feel under utilized?  Probably and it'll be decades before it would be changed.  The Whole Foods complex he did with Sembler was obviously "better than nothing", but that lot on a whole breaks up the urban fabric of that area and is heavily underutilized.  Having more stringent zoning / code should eliminate these sort of developments.
Yeah, it's a ridiculous design for the area. There was a neighborhood meeting about it but I'm not sure what came of it.
     
     
  #12902  
Old Posted Feb 3, 2015, 6:11 PM
micropundit micropundit is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,820
New'Riverwalk Village' renders.







The proposed Riverwalk Village is a 104-acre mixed-use development on the east side of Ga. 400 in Roswell. As currently envisioned, it will feature more than 1,500 residential units, 1.7 million square feet of office, a hotel and a school.Riverwalk Village is an ecologically driven development that will include parks and public spaces, pedestrian-oriented areas near retail and entertainment and a system of public running, walking and biking trails that will connect the development and surrounding neighborhoods to the Chattahoochee River.

Riverwalk has not yet come before the city for official approval or public input. The developers expect this process to begin mid-year. Construction could begin in the next two years.

http://atlanta.curbed.com/archives/2015/...age-brings-amsterdam-to-roswell.php#more
     
     
  #12903  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2015, 2:42 AM
1lifealex 1lifealex is offline
AK
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 286
Modera (90 Peachtree Place) has a tree cutting sign up I also saw heavy equipment the kind of heavy equipment that you would normally see at the beginning stages of construction so this may start soon we shall see
     
     
  #12904  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2015, 4:07 PM
AtlantaMustang's Avatar
AtlantaMustang AtlantaMustang is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 805
Big news about the streetcar and future westside park.

Quote:
Mayor Kasim Reed announced plans Wednesday to expand the Atlanta Streetcar and build what will become the city’s largest public park.
Speaking at the annual State of the City business breakfast, Reed said the city is taking the “first steps” to connect the Atlanta Streetcar’s downtown track eastward by three-quarters of a mile, ultimately connecting the rail line with the Beltline trail.
http://m.ajc.com/news/news/reed-announces-plans-for-citys-largest-park-street/nj4Wh/
__________________
Raised in Atlanta, based in Shanghai
     
     
  #12905  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2015, 4:44 PM
briantech's Avatar
briantech briantech is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 608
Quote:
Originally Posted by AtlantaMustang View Post
Thats kind of worded weird. Is he saying the streetcar expansion will connect to the beltline near the quarry?

Or are they just two separate events. Build the new park on the westside, AND extend the streetcar east to the eastside beltline trail?
     
     
  #12906  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2015, 4:51 PM
AtlantaMustang's Avatar
AtlantaMustang AtlantaMustang is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 805
Quote:
Originally Posted by briantech View Post
Thats kind of worded weird. Is he saying the streetcar expansion will connect to the beltline near the quarry?

Or are they just two separate events. Build the new park on the westside, AND extend the streetcar east to the eastside beltline trail?
2 separate events.
__________________
Raised in Atlanta, based in Shanghai
     
     
  #12907  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2015, 4:53 PM
NickH NickH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 72
Great news on the street car and park. Improving transportation and public spaces are so important as we continue to see all this exciting growth for the city.
     
     
  #12908  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2015, 5:38 PM
forj's Avatar
forj forj is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 312
he can talk all day but both of those things have already been planned for years and he didnt announce any new funding as far as i know. so he is just saying "i support these things being done"

doesnt really get us any closer to streetcar expansion or building the quarry park. I mean we all already know Reed supports those things right?

that being said, here's hoping this does somehow help gain interest in funding. The buzz around the quarry park has been picking up steam recently so that's good. I know it will happen eventually
     
     
  #12909  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2015, 6:42 PM
Atlanta3000 Atlanta3000 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Buckhead
Posts: 2,763
Quote:
Originally Posted by AtlantaMustang View Post
I'm prepared to be smacked for what I am about to say: Why the F are we looking at funding another park (actually one that would be the largest in Atlanta), when this city desperately needs transportation solutions or further the buildout of the beltline?

In the world of "unlimited" resources the quarry park sounds like a great idea, unfortunately we have "limited" resources and it is best not to spread them to thin.

Last edited by Atlanta3000; Feb 4, 2015 at 7:00 PM.
     
     
  #12910  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2015, 7:02 PM
Dettmann1 Dettmann1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 64
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atlanta3000 View Post
I'm prepared to be smacked for what I am about to say: Why the F are we looking at funding another park (actually one that would be the largest in Atlanta), when this city desperately needs transportation solutions or further the buildout of the beltline?

In the world of "unlimited" resources the quarry park sounds like a great idea, unfortunately we have "limited" resources and it is best not to spread them to thin.
Did you read the article? Funding for the park would come mostly from the Watershed department since they would also be making it a city water reservoir. That funding can't be used for transportation.
     
     
  #12911  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2015, 7:04 PM
RocketSurgeon RocketSurgeon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,037
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atlanta3000 View Post
I'm prepared to be smacked for what I am about to say: Why the F are we looking at funding another park (actually one that would be the largest in Atlanta), when this city desperately needs transportation solutions or further the buildout of the beltline.

In the world of "unlimited" resources the quarry park sounds like a great idea, unfortunately we have "limited" resources and it is best not to spread them to thin.
Ignoring the fact that the Westside Reservoir Park is part of the BeltLine, the city doesn't need the BeltLine any more than the park... you just want it more. That's not how tax revenue works anyway.
     
     
  #12912  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2015, 7:07 PM
teejay teejay is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 27
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atlanta3000 View Post
I'm prepared to be smacked for what I am about to say: Why the F are we looking at funding another park (actually one that would be the largest in Atlanta), when this city desperately needs transportation solutions or further the buildout of the beltline?
Because Atlanta is in the bottom third of cities when it comes to park space.
     
     
  #12913  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2015, 10:06 PM
Tuckerman Tuckerman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,013
It is always easy to compare what gets funded and what does not in terms of the real priorities. We apparently can easily support and fund large components of an unnecessary football stadium for more than 1.4 Billion $ and another 1/2 billion or so for an equally unnecessary baseball stadium. Can we fund the replacement of an outdated symphony hall? No. Necessary extensions of MARTA? No. A new park for the citizens? Apparently, yes maybe. The politics of funding at the local, state and national level is always amusing, if not depressing. Defense, yes; poverty, a little. While this is a topic for another thread, public funding does highly affect what the development of Atlanta will look like in the coming years. What would we like to see public monies spent on for the metro?
     
     
  #12914  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2015, 11:15 PM
ATLcubs ATLcubs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 123
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tuckerman View Post
It is always easy to compare what gets funded and what does not in terms of the real priorities. We apparently can easily support and fund large components of an unnecessary football stadium for more than 1.4 Billion $ and another 1/2 billion or so for an equally unnecessary baseball stadium. Can we fund the replacement of an outdated symphony hall? No. Necessary extensions of MARTA? No. A new park for the citizens? Apparently, yes maybe. The politics of funding at the local, state and national level is always amusing, if not depressing. Defense, yes; poverty, a little. While this is a topic for another thread, public funding does highly affect what the development of Atlanta will look like in the coming years. What would we like to see public monies spent on for the metro?
I have to respectfully disagree about the baseball stadium, the relocation of the stadium was actually very necessary, as most of the fans come from the north suburbs, and I believe the move will create more opportunities for future transportation improvements.

Last edited by ATLcubs; Feb 4, 2015 at 11:27 PM. Reason: grammar
     
     
  #12915  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2015, 1:34 AM
ATLcubs ATLcubs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 123
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1lifealex View Post
Modera (90 Peachtree Place) has a tree cutting sign up I also saw heavy equipment the kind of heavy equipment that you would normally see at the beginning stages of construction so this may start soon we shall see
Are there still no public renderings for the tower portion of this project? I'm curious to see what it will look like right next University House?
     
     
  #12916  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2015, 2:57 AM
shivtim's Avatar
shivtim shivtim is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Midtown Atlanta
Posts: 2,623
A few Loring Heights tidbits from the NPU-E agenda:
  • Someone is seeking rezoning of 434 Trabert Ave to "Multi-family residential (townhouses), maximum floor area ratio of 1.49, Beltline overlay." This is across the tracks from Target at Atlantic Station, near the under construction "Heights at West Midtown" and the proposed apartments and adjacent mystery project on Bishop street.
  • An applicant wants a parking variance for 490 Bishop Street, right on the 17th street curve next to the Heights at West Midtown. Not sure what this one's about, but they want 209 spaces for a "commercial development." For part of the same address, and a portion of the adjacent 1299 northside dr (which is across the street, so I'm not sure how it's "adjacent"), Fairfield Residential wants to rezone to "Multi-family residential, maximum floor area ratio of 3.2." Isn't this the Fuqua site?

This area is really taking off.
     
     
  #12917  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2015, 3:11 AM
Ant131531 Ant131531 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,984
I never understood why the area around Atlantic Station hasn't taken off already(I mean really exploded). That area is underrated as far as walkability. You're close to restaurants, shopping, and a movie theatre with a nice park and monument in the middle. That can't be said for many of the neighborhoods in Atlanta.
     
     
  #12918  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2015, 4:32 AM
RocketSurgeon RocketSurgeon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,037
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ant131531 View Post
I never understood why the area around Atlantic Station hasn't taken off already(I mean really exploded). That area is underrated as far as walkability. You're close to restaurants, shopping, and a movie theatre with a nice park and monument in the middle. That can't be said for many of the neighborhoods in Atlanta.
It actually hasn't taken long to fill in at all. There wasn't anything there until the late 00s (including the 17th Street bridge), and then there was a recession. Now that that's over, things are happening fast.

People used to make fun of Atlantic Station for being "in the middle of nowhere" and "an amusement park that suburbanites can come to and pretend they're in a city." I had a good feeling about it from the beginning and tried to convince those people to look into the future a little. It's not perfect, but the developer was forward thinking and the result has been the connection of Midtown and Westside, and now an entirely new neighborhood is growing organically around it.

The only reason it feels so "far" away (if you consider half a mile far) from the core of Midtown is that the northwestern part of Midtown is still mostly vacant. Once that area fills in, it's all going to feel like one contiguous neighborhood... the bridge will always be a long block to walk, but it will be the only gap eventually.
     
     
  #12919  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2015, 2:14 PM
Verge Verge is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 861
Quote:
Originally Posted by ATLcubs View Post
I have to respectfully disagree about the baseball stadium, the relocation of the stadium was actually very necessary, as most of the fans come from the north suburbs, and I believe the move will create more opportunities for future transportation improvements.
With equal respect-- the new Braves stadium is both a scam perpetrated on Cobb County (with their wholehearted participation) and a total break of trust with the city of Atlanta-- I am mad at the team and will be for a very long time as are many other (former) intown fans--
     
     
  #12920  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2015, 2:35 PM
Tuckerman Tuckerman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,013
On Braves to Cobb. The majority of attending fans may be on the northside of the metro, but the only connection to the new stadium will be by road and also by another unnecessary construction of an expensive pedestrian-ciculator bridge over I 285 (see today's AJC). If I believed that this move would actually result in a heavy rail MARTA line to the NW ending in Marietta or Kennesaw, I would be enthusiastic. IMO that possibility is decades away. I, for one, would not battle rush hour perimeter traffic on the northside to get to a 7:30 Braves game. It will be most interesting to follow the attendance at the new stadium.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:25 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.