HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Hamilton > Downtown & City of Hamilton


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2881  
Old Posted Dec 17, 2014, 2:55 PM
davidcappi's Avatar
davidcappi davidcappi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,992
Newly completed reno of the of BMO on James North:



Building restoration on James North:



Other building restoration on James North:



This building just got a new paint job and an update to the storefront with stone cladding:



Still not really sure what's happening here, but I'll go with it for now:





Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2882  
Old Posted Dec 18, 2014, 12:27 AM
Dr Awesomesauce's Avatar
Dr Awesomesauce Dr Awesomesauce is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: BEYOND THE OUTER RIM
Posts: 5,889
^Great update(s)! Thanks.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2883  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2015, 4:19 PM
davidcappi's Avatar
davidcappi davidcappi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,992

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2884  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2015, 12:09 AM
Dr Awesomesauce's Avatar
Dr Awesomesauce Dr Awesomesauce is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: BEYOND THE OUTER RIM
Posts: 5,889
^Can't wait to see the finished product. That last bay on the corner is gonna look funny. By funny I mean terrible, of course.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2885  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2015, 12:46 AM
matt602's Avatar
matt602 matt602 is offline
Hammer'd
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hamilton, ON
Posts: 4,786
Even though the cash store in the other part of the building moved across the street, the nail salon still remains. I figured they did that so that they could do the whole building at once, but now I'm not so sure. Should look good when it's done either way though, I didn't expect that they'd add a little part to the back of it as well.
__________________
"Above all, Hamilton must learn to think like a city, not a suburban hybrid where residents drive everywhere. What makes Hamilton interesting is the fact it's a city. The sprawl that surrounds it, which can be found all over North America, is running out of time."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2886  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2015, 10:38 AM
davidcappi's Avatar
davidcappi davidcappi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,992
Someone could do something cool with that corner.

For a lot of money, I'm assuming. Shame.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2887  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2015, 11:24 PM
Jon Dalton's Avatar
Jon Dalton Jon Dalton is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 1,778
From what I heard the corner owners weren't willing to sell. Which is their right I guess. Maybe they will get way more money in the future.
__________________
360º of Hamilton
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2888  
Old Posted Jan 19, 2015, 4:08 PM
LikeHamilton's Avatar
LikeHamilton LikeHamilton is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Posts: 2,758
3 companies want to build parking garages downtown

More parking facilities 'literally makes no sense,' critic says

By Samantha Craggs, CBC News Posted: Jan 18, 2015 3:36 PM ET Last Updated: Jan 19, 2015 9:02 AM ET

Despite critics saying that downtown Hamilton doesn't need any more parking, the city is talking to three companies right now interested in building new parking structures.

City staff is in preliminary discussions for parking facilities at King and Bay and an area east of James and north of King Street, said Marty Hazell, the city's director of parking and bylaw services. The developments would include other types of uses, such as commercial or office space, in addition to multi-level parking.

It’s still in the early stages. Some have money but no land. Some have land but need money. But Hazell expects to come to council sometime this year to update it and possibly get direction on where to go with the talks.

'We’re just throwing around some ideas.'
- Marty Hazell, director of parking and bylaw services
“Neither side in any of the discussions have had any urgent time lines to get something moving,” he said. “We’ll come back to council with as many options as we think are feasible.”

Councillors directed staff in September 2013 to put out a request for interest for private companies willing to build or partner on new downtown parking structures.

MMM Group Limited, a building services firm, did a parking study of downtown Hamilton. The report predicted a future parking shortage and recommended two new parking garages — one at King and Bay and one at John and King William. The structures would cost as much as $23 million for an above-grade garage and $29 million for below grade, the report said. It would also cost $520,300 per year to operate an above-ground garage and $552-500 for below grade.

No Hamilton tax dollars for downtown parking garage
Downtown needs hundreds of new parking spaces: report
Downtown parking by the numbers
The company cited new developments that would cover existing surface parking lots. There are also a number of new high-density condo developments planned for downtown. Among them is The Connolly, a 30-storey condo tower that plans for 259 condos and only 122 parking spaces.

But councillors balked at MMM's dollar figures, saying it made no financial sense for the city to get into the stand-alone parking garage business. Some also questioned the assertion that downtown needed more parking.

Parking demand has declined 10 per cent since 2005, the report showed. But MMM predicted that by 2022, 1,066 spaces will be lost to new developments, while demand will increase by 714 spaces.

'It literally makes no sense other than they have got it in their minds that we have to build more parking structures.'- Ryan McGreal

City council directed staff to put out a request for interest for companies who would want to incorporate a parking structure into a development that includes other uses, such as commercial or office space.

That request brought five responses, Hazell said. Of those, one remains, but two others have stepped forward since.

Does downtown need more parking?

Hazell wouldn’t give details about the companies. Their ideas are across the board, he said, as are ideas about how the city would contribute.

“We’re just throwing around some ideas. We’ll get as creative as we want to be but we’re not at the stage of those detailed discussions yet.”

In May, transit advocate Ryan McGreal wrote an article for his website, Raise the Hammer, called “Downtown Hamilton has a glut of parking, not a shortage.”

McGreal still questions the need for more parking.

Hamilton has some of the cheapest downtown parking rates of any city its size, he said. It’s cheaper to get a monthly parking pass than a monthly transit pass.

Report coming soon on sacrificing a surface lot

“Certainly, the evidence doesn’t indicate that we need parking facilities,” McGreal said.

Sacrifice a downtown parking lot for a good development: Farr
“It literally makes no sense other than (city officials) have got it in their minds that we have to build more parking structures.”

“We don’t need it, can’t afford it, and it’s actually contrary to our objectives.”

Coun. Jason Farr of Ward 2 wants to see a building with businesses on the ground floor. The city’s urban design panel should vet the developments, he said, so they would be complimentary to the surrounding buildings.

Farr also pushed the city in May to give up a surface parking lot for a good development. Downtown Hamilton is so covered in low-density surface lots, he said then, that it’s “an overwrought map of asphalt.”

Staff will come back to councillors within six weeks with ideas on submitting a request for proposal, which would invite interested companies to submit ideas for projects.

(There is a poll at the end of the article)

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/hamilton/n...build-parking-garages-downtown-1.2912932
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2889  
Old Posted Jan 19, 2015, 4:32 PM
Beedok Beedok is offline
Exiled Hamiltonian Gal
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,795
I say build them. Then those people can't complain as much about surface lots getting developed. Plus you can easily integrate some retail into a parking garage. They're not perfect, but if they'll allow more development it seems acceptable. We've got too much parking right now, but by the time these garages are finished hopefully a number of existing parking spaces will have been developped, and development will mean an increase in demand for parking.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2890  
Old Posted Jan 19, 2015, 4:54 PM
interr0bangr interr0bangr is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Landsdale
Posts: 559
I'm all for more parking "structures" if it means we can get rid of all the existing lots. North of King/East of James is a wasteland of terrible surface lots. We don't need more parking, but we do need more efficient use of prime space.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2891  
Old Posted Jan 19, 2015, 4:56 PM
HillStreetBlues HillStreetBlues is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: KW/Hamilton, Ontario
Posts: 995
Beedok is spot on. If we think about what we want our downtown to look like, it probably has very little surface parking and a number of garages. Who cares what the sequence is, garages being built or surface parking being developed? Like Beedok said, you’ll have much less opposition to losing surface parking to development if there are parking structures being built.

I think that retail can be incorporated quite successfully into a parking garage. The City of Kitchener recently had one built- at Charles and Benton- which has several retail spaces, and I think it turned out pretty well.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2892  
Old Posted Jan 19, 2015, 9:36 PM
matt602's Avatar
matt602 matt602 is offline
Hammer'd
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hamilton, ON
Posts: 4,786
I noticed today that a building is being worked on right beside the former sandbar on King. Anyone know what it is? It has wooden hoarding up over the ground floor, very narrow space.
__________________
"Above all, Hamilton must learn to think like a city, not a suburban hybrid where residents drive everywhere. What makes Hamilton interesting is the fact it's a city. The sprawl that surrounds it, which can be found all over North America, is running out of time."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2893  
Old Posted Jan 19, 2015, 11:50 PM
ScreamingViking's Avatar
ScreamingViking ScreamingViking is offline
Ham-burgher
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 7,476
If they decide to put one at King and Bay, I hope to hell it's part of an office or mixed-use building (and set behind it preferably).

A garage-only at that corner would be a damn shame, never mind a misuse of a prime lot. It's bad enough there's been surface parking there for such a long time.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2894  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2015, 8:25 PM
Jon Dalton's Avatar
Jon Dalton Jon Dalton is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 1,778
Dedicated parking structures are particularly asinine if the cost to build underground is only marginally higher:

Quote:
.The structures would cost as much as $23 million for an above-grade garage and $29 million for below grade, the report said. It would also cost $520,300 per year to operate an above-ground garage and $552-500 for below grade.
If that is the case, there would be more profit in building underground parking into a larger above ground development.
__________________
360º of Hamilton
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2895  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2015, 11:22 PM
Dr Awesomesauce's Avatar
Dr Awesomesauce Dr Awesomesauce is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: BEYOND THE OUTER RIM
Posts: 5,889
A terrible waste of space and concrete. Adding several parking garages will not necessarily mean an end to surface parking. We have enough. Stop the madness. If, however, a garage is proposed as a part of a larger project, well, that's different.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2896  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2015, 11:05 PM
ScreamingViking's Avatar
ScreamingViking ScreamingViking is offline
Ham-burgher
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 7,476
Great news about the Pasadena Apartments. Now waiting for approvals to move ahead with a rebuild/reno




Pasadena Apartments rise from the ashes as heritage icon with modern twist
The Hamilton Spectator - Jan 21, 2015
By Teviah Moro

After an all-night blaze ripped through the Pasadena Apartments, it looked as though the ashes of another Hamilton heritage jewel would be swept into the historical dustbin.

But nearly a year after the fire, a plan to bring back the Bold Street heritage beauty awaits city approval.

"I would say we'd hope to be renting by September, but a lot will be contingent on building permit approvals and those sorts of things," said David Nevins, vice-president of property management for Ottawa-based CLV Group.

"It's cleaned up and a roof put on it, so it's ready to be put back together again."

The renovation plan for 27 Bold St. calls for preserving as many heritage features in the 1914 building as possible, while adding contemporary amenities and safety provisions.

"The public spaces of the building will be put back to pretty much the same condition they were originally in," said Rick Lintack, of Lintack Architects on James Street South.

The Pasadena's hallmark central, circular staircase will be replaced using the original handrail but with new spindles that are 15 centimetres higher, to meet modern building standards.

Crown moulding, brackets and detailing will be replicated. The plan also calls for a new wooden front door and metal entrance canopy, features that were lost over the years.

The renovation will increase the number of units to 32 from 17, which means they'll be smaller but more in proportion, Lintack said.

...

read more
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2897  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2015, 11:22 PM
Dr Awesomesauce's Avatar
Dr Awesomesauce Dr Awesomesauce is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: BEYOND THE OUTER RIM
Posts: 5,889
^Great!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2898  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2015, 11:58 PM
Beedok Beedok is offline
Exiled Hamiltonian Gal
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,795
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr Awesomesauce View Post
A terrible waste of space and concrete. Adding several parking garages will not necessarily mean an end to surface parking. We have enough. Stop the madness. If, however, a garage is proposed as a part of a larger project, well, that's different.
We have enough now, but with the downtown seeming to recover do you want to wait until we don't have enough to try to build more capacity? You have to plan ahead.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2899  
Old Posted Jan 22, 2015, 12:36 AM
Dr Awesomesauce's Avatar
Dr Awesomesauce Dr Awesomesauce is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: BEYOND THE OUTER RIM
Posts: 5,889
^We 'planned ahead' with our roads and now look at what we've got - way more capacity than necessary and the crippling financial burden that goes with it.

I'm fairly buoyant on the city centre in general but I don't think we'll ever reach the point where parking is a truly critical issue.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2900  
Old Posted Jan 22, 2015, 1:06 AM
Beedok Beedok is offline
Exiled Hamiltonian Gal
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,795
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr Awesomesauce View Post
^We 'planned ahead' with our roads and now look at what we've got - way more capacity than necessary and the crippling financial burden that goes with it.

I'm fairly buoyant on the city centre in general but I don't think we'll ever reach the point where parking is a truly critical issue.
Hamilton just hasn't hit the point of the roads hitting the limit yet. The city's still got a lot of growth yet. It's definitely better to have too much road than not enough, otherwise you get ambulances and fire trucks sitting in traffic while people are dying because of congestion. (Ottawa's not quite that bad, but seems to be pushing it at certain times of day.) So you can over build, but underbuilding is usually worse. A parkade is still more urban than a parking lot, so is an improvement to the urban environment in and of itself. More jobs downtown with construction is also a decent idea.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Hamilton > Downtown & City of Hamilton
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:59 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.