HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Southwest


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #5541  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2015, 4:30 PM
PHXFlyer11 PHXFlyer11 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,441
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jjs5056 View Post
I wonder if they'll go back to the proposals submitted and select the runner-up or if they are required by law to go back and start the process all over again? If starting over, they might as well require the necessary components for the USA Basketball move (remember that only the hotel and conference center were required). The problem is USA Basketball apparently only has 15 employees, and with the amount of office space in the works in downtown, it might be hard to incorporate a commercial component into any feasible proposal. 15 people hardly qualifies as an anchor tenant. In fact, the commercial is probably a harder sell than the residential -- there is definite demand for urban living and there are hardly any downtown projects in the pipeline with a housing piece.

I highly doubt any of the other proposals included such an ambitious plan and I would be really disappointed to see one with massive garages, one-use buildings, unrealistic future phases for the southern portion, etc.
I would think they'd be required to re-open the RFP. But I'm sure they'd reach out to the runner-up and invite them to re-submit their bid. I just hope we don't miss USA Basketball, I know that they don't have a ton of employees, but they'd certainly fill some hotel rooms and it would add to the diversity of business in DT Tempe, something that is really needed. You don't get the opportunity for something this unique often, so I'd favor a smaller scale plan that has a higher probably of financing to ensure USA Basketball doesn't walk before it's too late.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5542  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2015, 5:10 PM
Jjs5056 Jjs5056 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by PHXFlyer11 View Post
I would think they'd be required to re-open the RFP. But I'm sure they'd reach out to the runner-up and invite them to re-submit their bid. I just hope we don't miss USA Basketball, I know that they don't have a ton of employees, but they'd certainly fill some hotel rooms and it would add to the diversity of business in DT Tempe, something that is really needed. You don't get the opportunity for something this unique often, so I'd favor a smaller scale plan that has a higher probably of financing to ensure USA Basketball doesn't walk before it's too late.
I am sure that Colangelo will want to see this through, especially considering that his original plan to move to AZ failed. Perhaps if we don't see it within this development, it will show up within the ASU Stadium District?

I do agree that it would be a good addition to Tempe, especially given its partnership with AIA which would ensure the venue was in use throughout the year, and bring another demo - families - downtown. But, it necessitates an office component for the development which may be hard to get financing for with all of the competition.

However, I don't think it's worth messing up the opportunity to develop this huge piece of land correctly. Downtown Tempe is running out of developable real estate and this property would almost double the size of what is considered the core. I'd be okay with a phased approach as long as there was a master plan presented upfront. But, I'm not okay with a proposal that recommends a hotel, conference center, events center, and small office space sprawled over this entire plot with above-ground parking, etc. There needs to be height, multiple mixed uses, etc.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5543  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2015, 5:21 PM
PHXFlyer11 PHXFlyer11 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,441
Some positive updates... not news per say, this was announced already, but updated with renderings:

http://www.azcentral.com/story/news/loca...ry-becomes-ultra-modern-office/21494227/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5544  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2015, 4:05 PM
KevininPhx KevininPhx is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 149
Perhaps this was posted elsewhere, not sure. USA Place is dead.

http://kjzz.org/content/88248/plans-die-usa-basketball-complex-downtown-tempe
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5545  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2015, 4:52 PM
Obadno Obadno is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,902
Quote:
Originally Posted by KevininPhx View Post
Perhaps this was posted elsewhere, not sure. USA Place is dead.

http://kjzz.org/content/88248/plans-die-usa-basketball-complex-downtown-tempe
It doesnt say USA place is dead they have been having finacning trouble for a few months, ID be surprised of ASU would just let this last piece of ASU campus fall through so easily
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5546  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2015, 5:04 PM
exit2lef exit2lef is offline
reasonably smart guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 3,355
Quote:
Originally Posted by KevininPhx View Post
Perhaps this was posted elsewhere, not sure. USA Place is dead.

http://kjzz.org/content/88248/plans-die-usa-basketball-complex-downtown-tempe
The last few paragraphs really venture into whiny territory. Tempe doesn't have a major traffic congestion problem, and a little congestion is a sign of urban vitality and a transportation mix that values pedestrians, transit users, and bicyclists as much as motorists. Speaking of transportation, it's frustrating that this article doesn't even mention light rail or the planned streetcar. I doubt transportation issues are why this project fell through, so it's disappointing this reporter and the professor she interviewed chose to dwell on them.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5547  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2015, 5:08 PM
Obadno Obadno is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,902
Quote:
Originally Posted by KevininPhx View Post
Perhaps this was posted elsewhere, not sure. USA Place is dead.

http://kjzz.org/content/88248/plans-die-usa-basketball-complex-downtown-tempe
Oh nevermind it is dead:

“Arizona State University has consistently required throughout the exclusive negotiating period that USA Place demonstrate its commitment to the transaction by making a substantial deposit to reinstate the option to lease. USA Place repeatedly pledged to provide a deposit to secure its commitments but never did so.”

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5548  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2015, 5:20 PM
DevilsRider DevilsRider is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 181
Quote:
Originally Posted by exit2lef View Post
The last few paragraphs really venture into whiny territory. Tempe doesn't have a major traffic congestion problem, and a little congestion is a sign of urban vitality and a transportation mix that values pedestrians, transit users, and bicyclists as much as motorists. Speaking of transportation, it's frustrating that this article doesn't even mention light rail or the planned streetcar. I doubt transportation issues are why this project fell through, so it's disappointing this reporter and the professor she interviewed chose to dwell on them.
Yeah, that was annoying to read. Corporations like State Farm aren't moving to Tempe because there's cheap land, an abundance of 7-lane arterials, and vast seas of parking. They're moving to Tempe to be in a more urban environment at the center of the region, close to light rail and planned streetcar and other non-driving options. If everyone thought like this "professor" seems to think they should, then all of the office development in the region would be in Gilbert, Eastmark, Surprise, and Avondale, and Tempe wouldn't have any development going on.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5549  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2015, 5:54 PM
PHXFlyer11 PHXFlyer11 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,441
Quote:
Originally Posted by Obadno View Post
Oh nevermind it is dead:

“Arizona State University has consistently required throughout the exclusive negotiating period that USA Place demonstrate its commitment to the transaction by making a substantial deposit to reinstate the option to lease. USA Place repeatedly pledged to provide a deposit to secure its commitments but never did so.”

I think we need to be clear here. Concord Eastridge's USA Place is dead. From what I read in these articles, nowhere does it say that USA Basketball has pulled out.

We need a new developer that will develop maybe have the parcel and can secure financing for a smaller project that has a high probability of closing.

ASU shares blame in this. They should hang on to the Southern most five acres, trim the development to 5, then RFP the later 5 when there is demand.

Demand for more retail, offices, condos and apartments are predicated on a couple of things:

1) Marina Heights Completion
2) HFL III Completion
3) Mill + Rio (Monti's) office tower
4) Hadyen Mill Amphitheater
5) Street Car

All of these things will increase demand for housing and retail, however none of these projects are completed, thus USA Place was very speculative in hoping their would be demand. You RFP the second 5 acres down the road when demand is proven and ensure that the first 5 get developed now. This will also create greater diversity and more of an organic growth than a 10-acre master planned project would. You'd probably even see taller buildings in both phases as phase 1 would need to cram more into a smaller space, and phase 2 would service demand that exists in the future for taller housing towers.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5550  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2015, 5:55 PM
PHXFlyer11 PHXFlyer11 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,441
Quote:
Originally Posted by DevilsRider View Post
Yeah, that was annoying to read. Corporations like State Farm aren't moving to Tempe because there's cheap land, an abundance of 7-lane arterials, and vast seas of parking. They're moving to Tempe to be in a more urban environment at the center of the region, close to light rail and planned streetcar and other non-driving options. If everyone thought like this "professor" seems to think they should, then all of the office development in the region would be in Gilbert, Eastmark, Surprise, and Avondale, and Tempe wouldn't have any development going on.
The professor is a moron to add that in there. Downtown Tempe has the best access to transit that any other place in the Valley. Loses alot of credability with the last commend he had to throw in.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5551  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2015, 6:42 PM
Jjs5056 Jjs5056 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,724
Not only is downtown Tempe already the Valley's best example when it comes to a true cosmopolitan district that is transit, bicycle, and pedestrian-friendly - which, as mentioned, is the reason for its recent and continued economic boom - it just released its comprehensive transportation plan that outlines its strategies for both 2020 and 2040, outright stating that its goal is to move people, not cars. So, it will only continue to grow in this area and create a city-wide transportation system that is worthy of the 21st century. They're the only city looking beyond the light rail for modes of transit with other benefits, and will have a robust streetcar system and bus rapid transit come 2040.

Complaints about traffic and parking in downtown areas always sounds so... unsophisticated and uneducated. There is a reason for those things - the demand to be in an urban center - and projects like USA Place that propose density in the core so that a car-free lifestyle becomes a possibility are the solution, not the problem.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5552  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2015, 6:54 PM
Jjs5056 Jjs5056 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by PHXFlyer11 View Post
I think we need to be clear here. Concord Eastridge's USA Place is dead. From what I read in these articles, nowhere does it say that USA Basketball has pulled out.

We need a new developer that will develop maybe have the parcel and can secure financing for a smaller project that has a high probability of closing.

ASU shares blame in this. They should hang on to the Southern most five acres, trim the development to 5, then RFP the later 5 when there is demand.

Demand for more retail, offices, condos and apartments are predicated on a couple of things:

1) Marina Heights Completion
2) HFL III Completion
3) Mill + Rio (Monti's) office tower
4) Hadyen Mill Amphitheater
5) Street Car

All of these things will increase demand for housing and retail, however none of these projects are completed, thus USA Place was very speculative in hoping their would be demand. You RFP the second 5 acres down the road when demand is proven and ensure that the first 5 get developed now. This will also create greater diversity and more of an organic growth than a 10-acre master planned project would. You'd probably even see taller buildings in both phases as phase 1 would need to cram more into a smaller space, and phase 2 would service demand that exists in the future for taller housing towers.
I think you're making quite a few assumptions in this post. I understand your thought process that a project seeking financing for only a hotel and event space for the USA Basketball HQ will have a better shot than one that includes residential, retail, and commercial components... but, I really don't think it's as simple as that.

1. There is a reason ASU and Tempe are RFPing the 10 acres all at one time; there is a demand for building in Tempe right now and they can fetch top dollar by bidding it out and, at the same time, develop a key parcel that has been languishing for decades now.
2. USA Basketball may be one of the harder parts of the proposal to finance, as it requires event space and commercial space; lenders may not feel that the event space will see a return on investment even if it is programmed throughout the year with high school sports, or they might feel that a city like Tempe is oversaturated with venues already of similar capacity especially with the looming Stadium District. Similarly, USAB isn't large enough of a tenant to secure financing for an office component, and any project will have a tough time securing leases when HFL3, Marina Heights, and Rio+Mill are all in the works.
3. That would leave us with just the hotel and conference center, which without the support of a flashy planned mixed use development that guarantees guests like Olympic Basketball stars, won't attract a brand like an Omni on its own. And, it's ASU's mission to bring a 4-star or equivalent brand to this site.
4. At the same time, even if the acreage was cut in half, 5 acres is a ton of space for a hotel project, meaning the end result would likely be LESS height, more above-ground parking, and less mixed us components. Even if a mixed use residential piece came about during a Phase II, those residences would be further from the core and not be nearly as integrated as they would be if all planned in one phase.

I think we'll see a new proposal that's not nearly as urban in its design, with multiple above-grade parking structures taking up real estate and producing dead zones. I think we'll see the north half proposed for a shorter hotel, conference center, and small retail, and the southern half 4-5 story residential with little to no retail involved. I think USA Basketball will get the axe and instead become part of the Stadium District plan.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5553  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2015, 8:07 PM
KevininPhx KevininPhx is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 149
Quote:
Originally Posted by PHXFlyer11 View Post
I think we need to be clear here. Concord Eastridge's USA Place is dead. From what I read in these articles, nowhere does it say that USA Basketball has pulled out.

We need a new developer that will develop maybe have the parcel and can secure financing for a smaller project that has a high probability of closing.

ASU shares blame in this. They should hang on to the Southern most five acres, trim the development to 5, then RFP the later 5 when there is demand.

Demand for more retail, offices, condos and apartments are predicated on a couple of things:

1) Marina Heights Completion
2) HFL III Completion
3) Mill + Rio (Monti's) office tower
4) Hadyen Mill Amphitheater
5) Street Car

All of these things will increase demand for housing and retail, however none of these projects are completed, thus USA Place was very speculative in hoping their would be demand. You RFP the second 5 acres down the road when demand is proven and ensure that the first 5 get developed now. This will also create greater diversity and more of an organic growth than a 10-acre master planned project would. You'd probably even see taller buildings in both phases as phase 1 would need to cram more into a smaller space, and phase 2 would service demand that exists in the future for taller housing towers.
KFYI today said it will move forward if a different developer steps in; said current problem was priced too high for Tempe tenants.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5554  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2015, 9:54 PM
PHXFlyer11 PHXFlyer11 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,441
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5555  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2015, 1:44 PM
PHXFlyer11 PHXFlyer11 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,441
USA Basketball not dead

As I had hoped, USA Basketball has not pulled out. Now let's get a real developer with real financing and make this happen!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5556  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2015, 11:14 PM
ASU Diablo ASU Diablo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,505
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5557  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2015, 1:51 AM
Jjs5056 Jjs5056 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,724
Didn't know Bison Witches closed/is closing. That, and Hooters, are listed as available for lease.

Here is a really detailed plan of Marina Heights... I hope whatever takes its place lives up this standard:

http://flyers.cushmanwakefield.com/flyers/Retail%20Site%20Plan_USAplace.pdf

On the opposite end of the urban scale, here is the package for Marina Heights, with detailed site plans and renderings. The good parts of this development have already been discussed - the main design theme, major employment center in a centralized, transit-accessible location, etc. However, this site plan just screams of a Tempe version of CityScape/AZ Center. It's completely inward facing, with most, if not all of the retail entrances off "main street" which cuts E-W through the development. The buildings form courtyards where there will be 2 parks and an "Arizona Room" - which, is actually anti-Arizona with the amount of concrete being proposed. These spaces all have very little visibility from either Rio Salado or the lake. Finally, a surface parking lot is going to front Rio Salado along the east garage.

I get that lakefront development requires difficult decisions from a design standpoint. But, this current model just doesn't do anything to synergize with downtown. Each development is completely insular, inward facing and self-contained. I don't expect perfection, but these are all turning out to be more of a suburban office park, which is a waste of what could've been an urban amenity.

The whole lakefront is totally disconnected, too. Marina Heights set up a fortress with the use of the garages as book ends... if these projects were all going to include inner roadways, why not plan ahead and create them so that a walk down "main street" can take you from Mill to Rural and through HFL, SALT and Marina Heights? Meh.

http://www.phoenixcommercialadvisors.com/listings/info/rurarios.htm

Last edited by Jjs5056; Jan 18, 2015 at 2:33 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5558  
Old Posted Jan 19, 2015, 3:45 AM
sh9730 sh9730 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 129
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5559  
Old Posted Jan 19, 2015, 3:57 AM
alexico alexico is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by sh9730 View Post

is this different than the kimpton Hotel where monti's used to be or supposed to be?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5560  
Old Posted Jan 19, 2015, 4:42 AM
phxSUNSfan's Avatar
phxSUNSfan phxSUNSfan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 718
Quote:
Originally Posted by alexico View Post
is this different than the kimpton Hotel where monti's used to be or supposed to be?
Yes, this was a south shore project by what is being called Pier 202 east of Rural Rd. It was one of those "obscure, Chinese-backed" developments. That obscurity is probably another reason Tempe was quick to cancel the deal once the deadline passed.

The owners of the Monti's property are Douglas Wilson Cos. (San Diego), Hensel Phelps, and Karlin Real Estate of Los Angeles.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Southwest
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:17 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.