HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #5541  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2015, 5:12 AM
Nouvellecosse's Avatar
Nouvellecosse Nouvellecosse is online now
Volatile Pacivist
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 11,149
Wouldn't SmartTrack serve a similar route to the DRL and be able to help with relieving the Bloor-Yonge choke point?
__________________
"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man." - George Bernard Shaw
Don't ask people not to debate a topic. Just stop making debatable assertions. Problem solved.
     
     
  #5542  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2015, 5:17 AM
SkahHigh's Avatar
SkahHigh SkahHigh is offline
More transit please
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Montreal
Posts: 3,794
I'm curious, what opinion do you guys have of SmartTrack? I find it to be a really interesting project.

Last edited by SkahHigh; Jan 15, 2015 at 5:34 AM.
     
     
  #5543  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2015, 1:52 PM
matt602's Avatar
matt602 matt602 is offline
Hammer'd
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hamilton, ON
Posts: 4,786
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkahHigh View Post
I'm curious, what opinion do you guys have of SmartTrack? I find it to be a really interesting project.
I don't think it will do anything to address the congestion on the Yonge line downtown like the DRL would, but at this point I'm a fan of anything in Toronto that actually gets built.
__________________
"Above all, Hamilton must learn to think like a city, not a suburban hybrid where residents drive everywhere. What makes Hamilton interesting is the fact it's a city. The sprawl that surrounds it, which can be found all over North America, is running out of time."
     
     
  #5544  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2015, 4:22 PM
MalcolmTucker MalcolmTucker is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 11,591
I always thought the east Danforth line should be diverted into the DRL, to force people to transfer if they want to take the more congested route.

Has any detailed modeling been done, or would that be at a later phase?
     
     
  #5545  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2015, 5:17 PM
SteelTown's Avatar
SteelTown SteelTown is offline
It's Hammer Time
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 20,355
Mississauga has no money to pay for planned $1.6-billion LRT

http://www.mississauga.com/news-story/52...oney-to-pay-for-planned-1-6-billion-lrt/

Mississauga’s mayor and city manager made a stunning admission Wednesday, stating that a planned $1.6-billion LRT along the city’s main thoroughfare is likely to be cancelled if the province can’t pay the full cost.

“I think there would be a very serious review of the feasibility of that project, from our perspective,” city manager Janice Baker said after Wednesday’s council meeting when asked why no money was being set aside for the project in the city’s 2015 budget, currently being presented to council.

If the province decides Mississauga must pay for even one-third of the cost, a common model, “I would say as the city manager my recommendation to city council would be that the impact of that on the property tax payer would be so onerous as to be impossible,” Baker said.

Mayor Bonnie Crombie said that “at the very least, it would be significantly delayed.” If the LRT isn’t 100 per cent externally funded, “There would be a very serious discussion with our council on if we want to proceed with it.”
     
     
  #5546  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2015, 5:31 PM
1overcosc's Avatar
1overcosc 1overcosc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 12,377
Sounds to me like prostrating to get the province to pay 100%. The province should say screw it, and offer two-thirds, Mississauga can either take it or leave it.

We need consistency with the $29B transit fund. Province can't be paying full cost of some projects and only a third of others.
     
     
  #5547  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2015, 5:48 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 28,543
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1overcosc View Post
Sounds to me like prostrating to get the province to pay 100%. The province should say screw it, and offer two-thirds, Mississauga can either take it or leave it.

We need consistency with the $29B transit fund. Province can't be paying full cost of some projects and only a third of others.
Damn right! Ottawa (or any city outside the GTA) could never pull something like that.
     
     
  #5548  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2015, 5:55 PM
Beedok Beedok is offline
Exiled Hamiltonian Gal
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,793
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.OT13 View Post
Damn right! Ottawa (or any city outside the GTA) could never pull something like that.
Hamilton has been attempting to because it sees the GTA doing it. (Doesn't seem to be having much luck though.)
     
     
  #5549  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2015, 6:17 PM
1overcosc's Avatar
1overcosc 1overcosc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 12,377
If Wynne announces that the province is funding $1.2B of the Hurontario-Main LRT, with the remaining $400M to come from Mississauga & Brampton, and that the project requires that $400M to continue, the political price for delaying or cancelling will be paid by Crombie. This could backfire horribly for her.

Wynne could theoretically 'force' Mississauga/Brampton to pay for it by instituting a provincial property tax in the two cities and raising $400M from it, but that would be horrible optics.
     
     
  #5550  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2015, 6:27 PM
lrt's friend lrt's friend is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 12,746
The provincial double standard we are seeing here, when they knowingly paid less than 1/3 for Phase 1 of the Confederation Line in Ottawa. Why should Mississauga and Brampton get 100%?
     
     
  #5551  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2015, 6:31 PM
MalcolmTucker MalcolmTucker is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 11,591
Quote:
Originally Posted by lrt's friend View Post
The provincial double standard we are seeing here, when they knowingly paid less than 1/3 for Phase 1 of the Confederation Line in Ottawa. Why should Mississauga and Brampton get 100%?
Well, because Ottawa vastly expanded and changed the scope of the project, leaving the original 2/3rds budget as 1/3rd no? When Toronto changes the scope on its projects the provincial envelope haven't changed iirc.
     
     
  #5552  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2015, 6:48 PM
Beedok Beedok is offline
Exiled Hamiltonian Gal
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,793
Ottawa tends to get more federal money as well doesn't it?
     
     
  #5553  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2015, 8:22 PM
MalcolmTucker MalcolmTucker is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 11,591
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beedok View Post
Ottawa tends to get more federal money as well doesn't it?
Not as of late. But the way federal dollars flow is rather complicated, so it can seem inequitable in certain years even when the allocations over the long term works out to a near identical per-capita contribution.
     
     
  #5554  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2015, 10:22 PM
Innsertnamehere's Avatar
Innsertnamehere Innsertnamehere is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 12,830
the 2/3rds part is likely because Ottawa isn't ponying up nearly as much money as the province is. Ottawa likely won't factor into all projects, only some, as QP is going to be giving out more money than the feds.
     
     
  #5555  
Old Posted Jan 16, 2015, 12:29 AM
miketoronto miketoronto is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 9,932
Mississauga is acting like this, because they have serious financial issues they will be facing in the coming years. This is from decades of trying to keep taxes low, and now they are facing massive infrastructure renewals and large tax increases.
__________________
Miketoronto
     
     
  #5556  
Old Posted Jan 16, 2015, 12:44 AM
niwell's Avatar
niwell niwell is online now
sick transit, gloria
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Roncesvalles, Toronto
Posts: 11,594
^Specifically non-residential taxes. Mississauga was able to lure so much employment from the inner-suburbs of Toronto with lower commercial tax rates and finance everything with development charges. Now they are basically out of greenfield land. Good luck to them - commercial taxes will be a bitch to change at this point.
     
     
  #5557  
Old Posted Jan 16, 2015, 6:40 AM
wg_flamip wg_flamip is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Toronto
Posts: 878
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1overcosc View Post
If Wynne announces that the province is funding $1.2B of the Hurontario-Main LRT, with the remaining $400M to come from Mississauga & Brampton, and that the project requires that $400M to continue, the political price for delaying or cancelling will be paid by Crombie. This could backfire horribly for her.
I'm not sure it will. I'm not so sure the majority of Mississauga residents even know that this project is in the pipeline, or that the majority of those who do really care all that much about it going forward.
     
     
  #5558  
Old Posted Jan 16, 2015, 8:40 AM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,204
The province could pay for the entire project scaled back by about 30% of its length.

A portion in MCC and a portion in Brampton CC. When the city's come up with the cash, they could pay to connect the two lines down the road.
     
     
  #5559  
Old Posted Jan 16, 2015, 12:29 PM
1overcosc's Avatar
1overcosc 1overcosc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 12,377
Quote:
Originally Posted by caltrane74 View Post
The province could pay for the entire project scaled back by about 30% of its length.

A portion in MCC and a portion in Brampton CC. When the city's come up with the cash, they could pay to connect the two lines down the road.
Given that Brampton is throwing hissy fits about the alignment, an option that has been discussed by many is truncating the line to Mississauga only as a first step.
     
     
  #5560  
Old Posted Jan 16, 2015, 12:31 PM
1overcosc's Avatar
1overcosc 1overcosc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 12,377
Quote:
Originally Posted by wg_flamip View Post
I'm not sure it will. I'm not so sure the majority of Mississauga residents even know that this project is in the pipeline, or that the majority of those who do really care all that much about it going forward.
Huh. Big contrast to Ottawa then. Here in Ottawa everyone knows about the Confederation Line and almost everyone is giddy about it. When politicians propose to cancel or downscale it, we lash out in fury against them. The Ontario PC Party and mayoral candidate Mike Maguire both learned this the hard way.

Last civic poll I saw said that 76% of Ottawans felt the Confederation Line was a very important civic project.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:25 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.