HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1341  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2015, 2:12 AM
Beedok Beedok is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,800
Those pics do a decent job of reminding folks that in some cases 'demolishing slums' actually was demolishing slums in some cases. I think a lot of people look at grand old victorian homes and think 'how could anyone have found these to be slums' when in reality those are still standing because they weren't slums. There were lots of areas with improper infrastructure, poor safety code compliance, and whatnot back in the day, and a lot of them were demolished for a reason. Certainly the US went a little overboard, but for the most part the pictures I've seen show that most Canadian urban renewal efforts made some sense. I don't agree with the auto-centric ideals of the time, but major redevelopment was needed in many areas.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1342  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2015, 8:56 AM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 22,842
Unbelievable how much has changed in only 42 years... it was such a "town" back then... people were even running across the Centre Street Bridge for gods sake!

• Video Link
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1343  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2015, 10:43 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 29,174
Ottawa 1972

Quote:
Originally Posted by drawarc View Post
Ottawa postcard from ebay, I'm guessing mid 70s:

Source:http://www.ebay.com/itm/Canada-Ottawa-Ae...ctables_Postcards_MJ&hash=item20dea04bc4
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1344  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2015, 11:46 PM
franktko's Avatar
franktko franktko is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,297
Couer de la Capitale, oh yeah! Nice picture
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1346  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2015, 1:46 AM
SignalHillHiker's Avatar
SignalHillHiker SignalHillHiker is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 36,353
Ga...ma...hu...strrrrbbbb....

LOVE those!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1347  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2015, 3:37 AM
MolsonExport's Avatar
MolsonExport MolsonExport is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 51,862
very cool Toronto streetcar set.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1348  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2015, 4:14 AM
shappy's Avatar
shappy shappy is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,346
Quote:
Originally Posted by MonkeyRonin View Post
Toronto in 1968, mostly streetcars:



19680510 43 TTC 4344 Dundas St. @ Keele St.
by davidwilson1949, on Flickr
This one is really cool. Streetcar service to the Junction switch to trolley in May 1968 - if this photo is properly dated then this must have been pretty close to one of the last streetcar runs to this area.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1349  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2015, 4:56 AM
niwell's Avatar
niwell niwell is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 11,657
Great pics! I wish the Dundas car went up into the Junction still - the area would be much more accessible.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1350  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2015, 5:53 AM
Monolith's Avatar
Monolith Monolith is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,234
Yes, excellent Toronto streetcar set!

I really wish Vancouver had kept theirs.

Granville St. ~1953

Granville Street, Vancouver, BC
by SwellMap, on Flickr
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1351  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2015, 1:34 PM
MolsonExport's Avatar
MolsonExport MolsonExport is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 51,862
^great shot.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1352  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2015, 1:29 AM
SignalHillHiker's Avatar
SignalHillHiker SignalHillHiker is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 36,353
1880 - Memorial University Archives





















I believe if we were part of Canada at that time we would have been the fourth or fifth largest city in the country, just behind:

1. Montreal
2. Toronto
3. Quebec
4. Halifax

But we would've been out of the Top 10 in the early 1900s.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1353  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2015, 5:41 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 29,174
What was the population in the 1880s?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1354  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2015, 5:53 PM
SignalHillHiker's Avatar
SignalHillHiker SignalHillHiker is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 36,353
No one knows for sure (our census documents did not survive) but it is estimated to have been approximately 30,000, but possibly more. We know it was 10,000+ in 1815 because crossing that milestone was recorded. And we know it exceeded 25,000 in the early 1870s because that was also recorded in other documents.

There's also the question of whether we defined a community the same way as Canada did at the time.

When we joined in 1949, for example, we said St. John's had 45,000 people. But Canada's first census found 111,454 in what is an area that covers less than our current CMA.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1355  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2015, 7:20 PM
MonkeyRonin's Avatar
MonkeyRonin MonkeyRonin is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,685
Quote:
Originally Posted by SignalHillHiker View Post
I believe if we were part of Canada at that time we would have been the fourth or fifth largest city in the country

Just for reference, Canada's 10 largest municipalities in the 1881 census:

1. Montreal, Quebec: 140,747
2. Toronto, Ontario: 86,415
3. Quebec, Quebec: 62,446
4. Halifax, Nova Scotia: 36,100
5. Hamilton, Ontario: 35,961
6. Ottawa, Ontario: 27,412
7. Saint John, New Brunswick: 26,127
8. London, Ontario: 19,746
9. Portland, New Brunswick: 15,226
10. Kingston, Ontario: 14,091


Note that Portland was a suburb of Saint John, so it really would have been a city of 41,000, possibly making it the fourth largest city. Other cities had adjacent suburban municipalities at that time as well though, so using their current city boundaries for example, Montreal would have had 189,168, Quebec 80,249, and Halifax 67,917 (but then these would also include rural populations). Not sure of the exact number for Toronto, but I'd estimate around 120,000-140,000.


And just for fun, found a list of each province's urban & rural populations in 1881 while looking for those numbers.

Urban / Rural / Total (% urban)

Prince Edward Island: 13,198 / 95,693 / 108,891 (12%)
Nova Scotia: 63,542 / 377,030 / 440,572 (14%)
New Brunswick: 59,092 / 262,141 / 321,233 (18%)
Quebec: 378,512 / 980,515 / 1,359,027 (28%)
Ontario: 575,848 / 1,351,074 / 1,926,922 (30%)
Manitoba: 10,245 / 52,015 / 62,260 (16%)
British Columbia: 9,070 / 40,389 / 49,459 (18%)

Canada: 1,109,507 / 3,271,749 / 4,381,256 (25%)


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_Canadian_cities_by_census#1881
http://www.statcan.gc.ca/tables-tableaux/sum-som/l01/cst01/demo62a-eng.htm

Last edited by MonkeyRonin; Jan 15, 2015 at 7:31 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1356  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2015, 7:25 PM
1overcosc's Avatar
1overcosc 1overcosc is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 12,377
Back in 1881 some of Kingston's population would have been in the then-suburban villages of Portsmouth and Barriefield. Both were functioning as suburbs of Kingston by the 1880s. The former was an independent municipality, the latter was part of Pittsburg Township. Between the two of them though it's likely that brings Kingston's 1881 population up to about 15,500-16,000 or so.

Fascinating that Kingston's population was just over half the size of Ottawa's back in 1881. If that ratio was maintained Kingston would have about 600,000 people today. Really goes to show how much Kingston stagnated over the years. With the exception of a period of decently fast growth in the immediate postwar era (1945-1970ish), population growth in Kingston has been pretty flat since 1850.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1357  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2015, 7:38 PM
MonkeyRonin's Avatar
MonkeyRonin MonkeyRonin is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,685
Oh and here's a drawing of Sherbrooke in 1881, which with 12,000 people at the time would have been just shy of making the above list.


Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1358  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2015, 9:42 PM
SignalHillHiker's Avatar
SignalHillHiker SignalHillHiker is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 36,353
Wow, it looked beautiful! Seems quite spread out - was that artistic license or was it actually not rowhouses? Most of the old Quebec communities have VERY dense cores.

Take these two shots, for example. This area of St. John's (Riverhead) was only just being settled at that time. So the rowhouse blocks aren't complete, but wherever they do exist, they're attached:



Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1359  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2015, 11:26 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 29,174
Quote:
Originally Posted by SignalHillHiker View Post
No one knows for sure (our census documents did not survive) but it is estimated to have been approximately 30,000, but possibly more. We know it was 10,000+ in 1815 because crossing that milestone was recorded. And we know it exceeded 25,000 in the early 1870s because that was also recorded in other documents.

There's also the question of whether we defined a community the same way as Canada did at the time.

When we joined in 1949, for example, we said St. John's had 45,000 people. But Canada's first census found 111,454 in what is an area that covers less than our current CMA.
Dear God that's a huge difference!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1360  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2015, 11:28 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 29,174
Quote:
Originally Posted by MonkeyRonin View Post
Just for reference, Canada's 10 largest municipalities in the 1881 census:

1. Montreal, Quebec: 140,747
2. Toronto, Ontario: 86,415
3. Quebec, Quebec: 62,446
4. Halifax, Nova Scotia: 36,100
5. Hamilton, Ontario: 35,961
6. Ottawa, Ontario: 27,412
7. Saint John, New Brunswick: 26,127
8. London, Ontario: 19,746
9. Portland, New Brunswick: 15,226
10. Kingston, Ontario: 14,091

And just for fun, found a list of each province's urban & rural populations in 1881 while looking for those numbers.

Urban / Rural / Total (% urban)

Prince Edward Island: 13,198 / 95,693 / 108,891 (12%)
Nova Scotia: 63,542 / 377,030 / 440,572 (14%)
New Brunswick: 59,092 / 262,141 / 321,233 (18%)
Quebec: 378,512 / 980,515 / 1,359,027 (28%)
Ontario: 575,848 / 1,351,074 / 1,926,922 (30%)
Manitoba: 10,245 / 52,015 / 62,260 (16%)
British Columbia: 9,070 / 40,389 / 49,459 (18%)

Canada: 1,109,507 / 3,271,749 / 4,381,256 (25%)


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_Canadian_cities_by_census#1881
http://www.statcan.gc.ca/tables-tableaux/sum-som/l01/cst01/demo62a-eng.htm
Strange to look at these population figures. The rankings have changed dramatically since those days.

Also interesting to see the urban/rural divide.

Thanks for posting.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:00 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.