This month's PAC agenda is hot off the presses, and there are a couple noteworthy items (all images taken from the above document).
---
First up is a rezoning and minor variances to permit the proposed residential conversion of St. Vincent's High School that we've been hearing rumblings about
:
The plan is for a total of 34 one- and two-bedroom apartments and some shared amenity space. 15 of the units will be provincially-designated affordable housing, while the rest will be market rentals.
The adjoining gymnasium (which I believe is a mid-20th century addition to the original building) doesn't appear to be part of this proposal, and it's unclear what the Diocese intends to do with it at this time.
---
The second proposal is from Paul Daeres, and is somewhat complicated.
As I understand it, the proposal is to establish a commercial parking lot on most of the former Paramount site (Lot 14-01 below)
in order to sell the remainder of the site and the adjacent former Belmont Hotel site (Lot 14-02 below, currently parking) to Cobalt Properties. Apparently, the intention is then to close off and hydroseed the existing parking area.
Cobalt owns the former Dominion store at the corner of Sydney and King Square North, and this transaction would assemble a decent-sized redevelopment site for them. However, as with their other Uptown land holdings, there doesn't appear to be anything in the works just yet.
Staff have recommended a number of conditions be imposed, most notably increased landscaping requirements for the interface with King Square North.
This is the proposal as submitted:
And this shows the modifications to the landscaped area recommended by staff:
Note that the report does not recommend imposing any requirement for Daeres or Cobalt to decommission/landscape the existing parking area on the former Belmont Hotel site. They've stated that they intend to do it, but my spider senses tell me it might be prudent for PAC to add an explicit condition to that effect.
The complex nature of this proposal certainly doesn't work in its favour, particularly in light of the bad feeling in the community around the Paramount's demolition. I find the current proposal to be reasonable if (and only if) the existing Belmont parking area is closed, but a lot of politicians are now in an awkward position after repudiating the possibility of any parking whatsoever on the Paramount site during the controversy that erupted last summer. Expect lots of public attention on this one and at least two TJ editorials that blame the City for everything.
---
Next post is #10,000!!!