Quote:
Originally Posted by djh
Thanks for the update on this, Vanciti. I'm glad to hear there's finally going to be some progress on this long-abandonded eyesore. It's in such a prominent location that it's amazing the city has not hurried-up the project up until now. I also hate to think how much money the owner has lost (or rather, not made) with the property sitting undeveloped all this time.
|
Just noticed the construction elevator lighting on the weekend, and was surprised to see any activity.
The city can't "hurried-up the project up" since they have no financial stake in the project.
Full or empty, the building still has to pay their taxes.
Failure to do so & the city can seize the property, but would they want to seize a half un-demolished asbestos infested building to pay back taxes? The cost of making the building fit for resale or demolishing it to bare land would likely be more than the overdue taxes they would be trying to recover.