Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire
Who do you think is paying him or her off? It appears that there are many people with various grievances against Mady/Fortress, so I hope it wasn't much.
While we're asking questions, I wonder how long until this thread gets libel chilled into lockdown?
|
I like how a
moderator around here is actually acting as an apologist. I mean, there's no possibility that all of those news articles are correct or even Charles Mady himself when he talks about the straits in which the project and others are currently in. No. Instead, it's fairly obvious that some sub presumably? I have no idea. Anyway, somebody is paying some random person to post links to newspaper articles in a forum? But we don't know who and there isn't even any logical explanation as to why. Especially given the insanity of why you might pay somebody to do what three separate newspapers have already done for free.
And a lawyer can send notices of libel all day long. The best defense from libel/slander is the truth. If that lawyer also wants to pass along some case law exhibiting a party that was found guilty of re-posting an internet article that quotes his client, I'd be happy to read through it. Everything else we talk about is either in a published, publicly accessible bond rating or is everyday investment speculation which isn't libel under
any definition.
Threaded Mode