Quote:
Originally Posted by 1487
of course not. Same parking lot we've seen for years.
|
I heard on the street the Chinese backed out once they saw photos of the Wendy's across the street.
Just kidding.
Seriously, my understanding is that the EB-5 program has essentially been structured as construction/bridge financing. I.e., individual investors put up $500K or so for 2 - 5 years. At the end of that term, permanent financing comes in and repays the the EB-5 investment, and the investors get their green cards.
Apparently EB-5 requires minimal interest. So the main advantage to the developer for using it is that it saves tons in construction interest cost, and therefore reduces the permanent takeout financing need commensurately (i.e., by the amount of interest savings).
But like a construction lender, the immigrant investors want their money back quickly and need to see a very strong commitment for permanent financing. That's why they love government-funded projects like the Turnpike/I-95 interchange, which already has permanent funding committed by a very reliable source (i.e., the Commonwealth).
Apparently, EB-5 also provided construction funding for the public portions of the Comcast Center.
But the W Hotel is a bit more speculative than those projects. Who knows how firm the permanent funding commitments are? Plus, the TIF and HUD108 components make the whole thing more complicated. Complicated means there are more things that can go wrong before the permanent lender has to step in, and that tends to scare short term investors.
So EB-5 may be a hard sell for the W. But it's possible that EB-5 is being pursued less for the interest savings and more because conventional construction lenders might be even more unsure about lending the needed amount of construction funding.
The delays suggest to me that construction funders are nervous about the risks that can accrue prior to take-out by permanent financing. The main way to reduce exposure is to reduce the amount of construction financing. This would require the developer & partners to front more of the short term money, but then this typically severely thins the return on equity. Equity investors are all about adding leverage ("OPM") and boosting ROE,
not the reverse.
So I suspect this kind of stuff might be the cause of some of the delay that we seem to be seeing.
My guess, anyhow.