HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive


    W Philadelphia & Element Philadelphia Hotel in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • Philadelphia Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location
Philadelphia Projects & Construction Forum

 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #481  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2014, 5:07 PM
Cro Burnham's Avatar
Cro Burnham Cro Burnham is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: delco
Posts: 2,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1487 View Post
of course not. Same parking lot we've seen for years.
I heard on the street the Chinese backed out once they saw photos of the Wendy's across the street.

Just kidding.

Seriously, my understanding is that the EB-5 program has essentially been structured as construction/bridge financing. I.e., individual investors put up $500K or so for 2 - 5 years. At the end of that term, permanent financing comes in and repays the the EB-5 investment, and the investors get their green cards.

Apparently EB-5 requires minimal interest. So the main advantage to the developer for using it is that it saves tons in construction interest cost, and therefore reduces the permanent takeout financing need commensurately (i.e., by the amount of interest savings).

But like a construction lender, the immigrant investors want their money back quickly and need to see a very strong commitment for permanent financing. That's why they love government-funded projects like the Turnpike/I-95 interchange, which already has permanent funding committed by a very reliable source (i.e., the Commonwealth).

Apparently, EB-5 also provided construction funding for the public portions of the Comcast Center.

But the W Hotel is a bit more speculative than those projects. Who knows how firm the permanent funding commitments are? Plus, the TIF and HUD108 components make the whole thing more complicated. Complicated means there are more things that can go wrong before the permanent lender has to step in, and that tends to scare short term investors.

So EB-5 may be a hard sell for the W. But it's possible that EB-5 is being pursued less for the interest savings and more because conventional construction lenders might be even more unsure about lending the needed amount of construction funding.

The delays suggest to me that construction funders are nervous about the risks that can accrue prior to take-out by permanent financing. The main way to reduce exposure is to reduce the amount of construction financing. This would require the developer & partners to front more of the short term money, but then this typically severely thins the return on equity. Equity investors are all about adding leverage ("OPM") and boosting ROE, not the reverse.

So I suspect this kind of stuff might be the cause of some of the delay that we seem to be seeing.

My guess, anyhow.

Last edited by Cro Burnham; Dec 5, 2014 at 5:21 AM.
     
     
  #482  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2014, 11:55 PM
GarCastle GarCastle is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 469
I would think the major clients signing up for future Convention Center gigs would help. Things like AHA 2019 with its projected 51,000 room-nights needed across the nights of the convention.

Cheers,
G.
__________________
"I don't need the city, it never cared for me." - Neuroticfish.
     
     
  #483  
Old Posted Dec 5, 2014, 4:31 AM
Flyers2001 Flyers2001 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 859
Quote:
Originally Posted by GarCastle View Post
I would think the major clients signing up for future Convention Center gigs would help. Things like AHA 2019 with its projected 51,000 room-nights needed across the nights of the convention.

Cheers,
G.
I think you hit the nail on the head. There has been sufficient evidence over the last 3 months that the Convention Center is now going to be used the way it was envisioned when they expanded. Conventions like the AHA are looking to become the norm. This is huge for the tourist and hospitality industry. Philadelphia needs more hotel rooms, esp those close to the Convention Center. I would also favor Philadelphia winning the Democratic Convention.
     
     
  #484  
Old Posted Dec 5, 2014, 5:09 AM
Cro Burnham's Avatar
Cro Burnham Cro Burnham is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: delco
Posts: 2,396
Projected convention bookings are good stuff. But I'm not sure low-risk, short-term EB-5 investors looking for a very safe exit strategy are considering such factors. Mainly what they'll want to see is a very tight commitment of permanent financing.

In fact, if permanent financing commitment is made contingent on the level of bookings at the convention center two or three years from now, I imagine that would make it pretty hard to secure sufficient construction financing.
     
     
  #485  
Old Posted Dec 5, 2014, 1:38 PM
1487 1487 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 3,401
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cro Burnham View Post
Projected convention bookings are good stuff. But I'm not sure low-risk, short-term EB-5 investors looking for a very safe exit strategy are considering such factors. Mainly what they'll want to see is a very tight commitment of permanent financing.

In fact, if permanent financing commitment is made contingent on the level of bookings at the convention center two or three years from now, I imagine that would make it pretty hard to secure sufficient construction financing.
when the public financing was sought we were left with the impression that it was the missing link in the package. Seems that wasnt the case and it was just presented that way in order to get quick passage in Council. That was about a year ago if I remember correctly and the developers indicated ground breaking would be only a few months away.
     
     
  #486  
Old Posted Dec 9, 2014, 9:29 AM
rricci rricci is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 187
Word on W

Nanyika over at the Philadelphiaspeaks has this to say:

The word is that the W is supposed to break ground early in 2015, and start rising by around June. For weeks now, they've been hiring people for the June construction phase.

Can anyone cionfirm this?
     
     
  #487  
Old Posted Dec 9, 2014, 3:57 PM
boxbot's Avatar
boxbot boxbot is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Delco., Pa.
Posts: 842
Quote:
Originally Posted by rricci View Post
Nanyika over at the Philadelphiaspeaks has this to say:

The word is that the W is supposed to break ground early in 2015, and start rising by around June. For weeks now, they've been hiring people for the June construction phase.

Can anyone cionfirm this?
Take a look back through this thread. No one can confirm and if they did, I wouldn't believe them. To recap:

November 2012: W is supposed to break ground in early 2013
August 2013: W is supposed to break ground in early 2014
January 2014: W is supposed to break ground in early 2014 (Lenfest himself)
June 2014: Wendy’s Wendy’s Wendy’s Wendy’s Wendy’s
July 2014: W is supposed to break ground in fall 2014
December 2014: W is supposed to break ground in early 2015
     
     
  #488  
Old Posted Dec 16, 2014, 3:51 PM
loves development loves development is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 31
Fyi

Permit Number 563657

Application Type NEW CONSTRUCTION PERMIT

Permit Type ANC-FOUNDATION

Status ACTIVE

Date Issued November 12, 2014

Last Updated November 17, 2014

Work Description

REMOVAL OF PARKING SURFACE AND MISC ITEMS, BULK EXCAVATION OF BLDGS BASEMENT AND THE INSTALLATION OF TEMPORARY EXCAVATION SUPPORT SYSTEMS AND TIE BACK INDERPINNING. INSTALLATION OF BLDGS MAT SLAB FOUNDATION.

Contractor Name
Contractor Address

TUTOR PERINI BUILDING CORP

THE PHOENIX
1600 ARCH ST; STE 300
PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103
     
     
  #489  
Old Posted Dec 16, 2014, 5:45 PM
Cro Burnham's Avatar
Cro Burnham Cro Burnham is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: delco
Posts: 2,396
Promising.
     
     
  #490  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2014, 4:17 PM
1487 1487 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 3,401
finally some real sign of action. I walked past there 2 day ago and saw nothing new. Not even a sign mentioning closing of the parking lot.
     
     
  #491  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2014, 11:51 PM
Philly-Drew's Avatar
Philly-Drew Philly-Drew is offline
Φιλαδέλφεια
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: NoLibs
Posts: 1,395
Loves development, only 7 posts? What a splash on this post. I am so excited for this project, and SLS (now that CITC and FMC has started).

To Cro Burnham's point, this is the most promising news about this project thus far, period.

Fingers crossed!
__________________
"Imagine all the people, living life in peace." :Lennon
     
     
  #492  
Old Posted Dec 20, 2014, 7:19 PM
jsbrook jsbrook is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Bala Cynwyd
Posts: 3,658
Quote:
Originally Posted by Philadelcago View Post
this rendering is at the bottom of the planphilly article linked from last page, is this not the latest?

If this is moving forward (and hopefully it is) I hope this remains the design and that it hasn't been altered for cost reasons.
     
     
  #493  
Old Posted Dec 23, 2014, 10:49 PM
iheartphilly's Avatar
iheartphilly iheartphilly is offline
Philly Rising Up!
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: motherEarth
Posts: 3,263
Starwood sells its Philly airport hotels; Lightstone buys 2 for $22M
. Could this be a positive sign that the W/Element will get built>
See link:
http://www.philly.com/philly/blogs/inq-phillydeals/Philly-airport-hotels-sold.html
     
     
  #494  
Old Posted Dec 26, 2014, 7:15 PM
summersm343's Avatar
summersm343 summersm343 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 18,457
Permits posted on the fence.
     
     
  #495  
Old Posted Dec 26, 2014, 7:30 PM
boxbot's Avatar
boxbot boxbot is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Delco., Pa.
Posts: 842
Quote:
Originally Posted by summersm343 View Post
Permits posted on the fence.
It's a Christmas miracle!

     
     
  #496  
Old Posted Dec 26, 2014, 7:42 PM
jsbrook jsbrook is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Bala Cynwyd
Posts: 3,658
Quote:
Originally Posted by boxbot View Post
It's a Christmas miracle!

Woot! Finally. Great news!
     
     
  #497  
Old Posted Dec 26, 2014, 7:56 PM
1487 1487 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 3,401
What I would like to see is something indicating a close date on that parking lot. Im sure many center city drivers are going to be upset to see that prime lot disappear- its always at capacity.
     
     
  #498  
Old Posted Dec 26, 2014, 11:37 PM
jsbrook jsbrook is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Bala Cynwyd
Posts: 3,658
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsbrook View Post
Woot! Finally. Great news!
Permit issuance date says 11/12/2014.
     
     
  #499  
Old Posted Dec 27, 2014, 4:23 PM
Philly-Drew's Avatar
Philly-Drew Philly-Drew is offline
Φιλαδέλφεια
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: NoLibs
Posts: 1,395
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1487 View Post
What I would like to see is something indicating a close date on that parking lot. Im sure many center city drivers are going to be upset to see that prime lot disappear- its always at capacity.
1487, I'm not arguing or anything, and I respect the opinion of others even if I don't agree with them. This however is a skyscraper website, with heavy discussion on urban development. I would think that most of us are jumping up and down that a surface parking lot in a prime location is going away, especially for a building like the one in the recent renderings. Surface parking lots are an absolute terrible use of urban space.

Why do you have concern over the lot and the people parking in it? There are other lots downtown. People can park in one of the other lots, or take public transportation.

You have me really confused dude.
__________________
"Imagine all the people, living life in peace." :Lennon
     
     
  #500  
Old Posted Dec 27, 2014, 4:29 PM
MusicMan84 MusicMan84 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 284
Quote:
Originally Posted by Philly-Drew View Post
1487, I'm not arguing or anything, and I respect the opinion of others even if I don't agree with them. This however is a skyscraper website, with heavy discussion on urban development. I would think that most of us are jumping up and down that a surface parking lot in a prime location is going away, especially for a building like the one in the recent renderings. Surface parking lots are an absolute terrible use of urban space.

Why do you have concern over the lot and the people parking in it? There are other lots downtown. People can park in one of the other lots, or take public transportation.

You have me really confused dude.
I think it is quite possible 1487 is just pointing out that a closure notice on the parking lot would be another progress indicator to look for. Another sign of this moving forward.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:54 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.