HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #10721  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2014, 8:23 PM
BrianTH BrianTH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,078
Quote:
Originally Posted by Urbana View Post
According to the URA document, the parcel in question is a couple blocks away from that site. Having nothing to do with those apartments at all. Or am I mistaken?
I think that is two different things, even though they both have Mellon Orchard in the name. One is a URA project, and one on ELDI land, which may explain the lack of coordination on the names.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10722  
Old Posted Dec 14, 2014, 1:08 AM
ShooFlyPie ShooFlyPie is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 321
I ride through Larimer every weekend and took a small point and shoot pocket camera today. Comparisons of infill from 12-13-14 to Google Imagery from 7/2014.
Meadow & Braden St.

Carver & Indiana

Lenora & Pace

Carver & Braden

Carver & Ashley

Medow & Lenora

Carver & Lenora

Larimer & Meadow
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10723  
Old Posted Dec 14, 2014, 1:17 AM
BrianTH BrianTH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,078
Very cool!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10724  
Old Posted Dec 14, 2014, 7:27 PM
Austinlee's Avatar
Austinlee Austinlee is offline
Chillin' in The Burgh
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Spring Hill, Pittsburgh
Posts: 12,488
How many homes are to be built in Larimer?
__________________
Check out the latest developments in Pittsburgh:
Pittsburgh Rundown III
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10725  
Old Posted Dec 15, 2014, 4:23 AM
eschaton eschaton is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 5,608
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianTH View Post
I think that is two different things, even though they both have Mellon Orchard in the name. One is a URA project, and one on ELDI land, which may explain the lack of coordination on the names.
I note that all of the buildings have been acquired by a "Mellon's Orchard I LP." That they use the I qualifier suggests there will be a II, and maybe a III, as time goes on - similar to how both East Side and Bakery Square have been used for a number of different projects now.

Regardless, this appears to be the development envelope. Every single apartment building (which includes the mid-20th century monstrosities, and the early 20th century cool apartment blocks) has a Mellon's Orchard sign on it now if you look close enough.

As I said upthread, I'm guessing they are saving the house in the rear (which seems to be an old carriage house). I'm 100% sure though, given it seems small to make into apartments. But there are no adjacent houses owned by the same holding company.

Given they are knocking down historic buildings, it's a shame they couldn't have expanded the envelope of development more. There's an an adjacent mid-century apartment on Rippey I'd love to see go as well. Not to mention two small vacant lots on Rural I'm shocked they weren't able to aggregate.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10726  
Old Posted Dec 15, 2014, 5:40 AM
BrianTH BrianTH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,078
Quote:
Originally Posted by Austinlee View Post
How many homes are to be built in Larimer?
I think this first phase is about 40 homes. Ultimately the plan is to do over 300 units, including townhouses and apartments.

Last edited by BrianTH; Dec 15, 2014 at 11:46 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10727  
Old Posted Dec 15, 2014, 1:39 PM
Evergrey's Avatar
Evergrey Evergrey is offline
Eurosceptic
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 24,141
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianTH View Post
I think this first phase is about 40 homes. Ultimately the plan is to do over 300 units, including townhouses and apartments.
http://triblive.com/news/allegheny/7134320-74/million-housing-larimer

Quote:
Larimer neighborhood turning corner toward renewal with development

...

Columbus, Ohio-based KBK Enterprises began construction in the fall of 40 apartments and townhouses that will be available for rent next year to low-income residents. The $13.5 million project is being funded through $10.85 million in federal housing tax credits, a $1.65 million loan from the Department of Housing and Urban Development and a $1 million loan from the Pittsburgh Urban Redevelopment Authority.

...

During the next six years, the Pittsburgh Housing Authority, other government agencies and civic groups will construct 334 houses, apartments and townhouses worth $91.2 million as part of a HUD initiative known as Choice Neighborhoods, according to Caster Binion, the housing authority's executive director.

...

KBK is also doing the Addison Terrace redevelopment in the Hill District... which is looking awesome (just drove through it on Saturday)

http://kbkenterprises.net/projects/addison-terrace/

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10728  
Old Posted Dec 15, 2014, 2:59 PM
BrianTH BrianTH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,078
Mistick, which is doing the construction for the Skyline Terrace (formerly Addison Terrace) project, also periodically publishes some nice overhead shots. The latest set:

http://www.mistickconstruction.com/projects/addison-terrace.html#images/addison-terrace-14.jpg













I agree this is all looking quite nice for a project of this nature. It is tough to get a brand new neighborhood like this to even somewhat resemble the more naturally eclectic nature of the historic neighborhoods that were built up over decades. They are also doing a nice job incorporating some homes with significant verticality. I particularly like these units with the gambrel roofs--you see similar sorts of side views in some of the nicest parts of Squirrel Hill and such:

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10729  
Old Posted Dec 15, 2014, 4:40 PM
Evergrey's Avatar
Evergrey Evergrey is offline
Eurosceptic
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 24,141
http://www.bizjournals.com/pittsburgh/bl...er-considering-condo-conversion-for.html


Quote:
New developer considering condo conversion for former Holy Family property in Lawrenceville

Dec 15, 2014, 11:28am EST

...

Synergy Capital, a Ross Township-based real estate investment firm specializing in renovation projects, indicated on its website that it may pursue the former church property as a 55-unit condo development.

...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10730  
Old Posted Dec 15, 2014, 7:21 PM
TBone7281 TBone7281 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 686
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianTH View Post
I think this first phase is about 40 homes. Ultimately the plan is to do over 300 units, including townhouses and apartments.
That has to a be a huge chunk of the neighborhood, right? The 2010 census only listed Larimer having a population of 1728.

An additional 300 houses is going to have a significant impact on that assuming people move in.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10731  
Old Posted Dec 15, 2014, 7:26 PM
BrianTH BrianTH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,078
Quote:
Originally Posted by TBone7281 View Post
That has to a be a huge chunk of the neighborhood, right? The 2010 census only listed Larimer having a population of 1728. An additional 300 houses is going to have a significant impact on that assuming people move in.
Oh yes. They are also doing new green spaces and new infrastructure, and also funding a bunch of services. It is a very comprehensive approach to trying to reinvigorate Larimer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10732  
Old Posted Dec 15, 2014, 7:27 PM
BrianTH BrianTH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,078
I always wondered what had happened to the Holy Family project. Last I knew they were running into NIMBY issues, then it went silent.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10733  
Old Posted Dec 15, 2014, 7:50 PM
BrianTH BrianTH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,078
Totally missed this:

http://www.post-gazette.com/opinion/2014...-Fayette-Expressway/stories/201412120038

Quote:
The Mon Valley Progress Council now asks Gov.-elect Tom Wolf to take the next step and do all he can to complete the Mon-​Fayette Expressway north of Route 51. Last year our organization proposed an alternative for this remaining section of the expressway project that addresses many of the concerns of the existing project design. The alternative we call the Expressway/​Busway East Extension(E/​BEE) includes a multi-modal component that would involve extending the Martin Luther King Jr. Busway from Swissvale to the proposed expressway alignment in East Pittsburgh.

This busway extension would replace the costly and controversial expressway link into the city of Pittsburgh. The proposed Mon-Fayette Expressway toll road from Route 51 in Large to I-376 in the Monroeville area would still be constructed under our proposal. It is estimated that the E/​BEE would cut the costs of the original project design north of Route 51 by almost one-half.
That's actually an interesting proposal. By far the worst part of the MFE plan was that spur into Pittsburgh, which is probably dead for a variety of reasons. An extension of the Busway further east, on the other hand, is probably the single best bang for the buck idea that has been studied in recent years.

However, I personally wouldn't leap on this proposal quite yet. The other parts of the MFE are still extremely expensive, and may do more harm than good to the existing Mon Valley communities. I'd also suggest ending the Busway at East Pittsburgh is too short--it really should go all the way to at least Monroeville.

So it remains a better idea to just do that East Busway extension. However, with the way money sloshes around this state, this could end up being a compromise idea worth working on.

Edit: Oh wait, I do remember this:

http://www.post-gazette.com/local/region...orter-changes-lanes/stories/201307200135

Quote:
Most observers, including state Transportation Secretary Barry Schoch, have essentially written off the Pittsburgh leg as too problematic and expensive. And now, Mr. Kirk, perhaps the most outspoken supporter of the expressway, has joined them. Even a $2.5 billion transportation funding bill that passed the state Senate but died in the House last month would not have had sufficient money to finance the expressway into Pittsburgh, he said.

Instead, he has proposed completing the 13-mile leg to Monroeville; extending the East Busway by 2.8 miles so that it connects with the expressway in East Pittsburgh; building a park-n-ride lot where the expressway connects with the parkway in Monroeville; and allowing HOV traffic on the busway.
If that is still the plan, screw that.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10734  
Old Posted Dec 15, 2014, 8:14 PM
BrianMM111 BrianMM111 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 5
Quote:
Originally Posted by daviderik View Post
Does anyone have any photos of the newly renovated Air mall? I read that it was opened to the public over the weekend. People waited in line for over an hour and went through a background check just to shop.
As of yesterday (12/14), the Air mall was still very much under construction. The stores appeared to be open/complete, but all of the public areas were still cement floors/white painted plywood walls.

Unfortunately, I didnt think to take any pictures... (sorry)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10735  
Old Posted Dec 15, 2014, 9:22 PM
daviderik daviderik is offline
Hell with the Lid Off.
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 305
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianMM111 View Post
As of yesterday (12/14), the Air mall was still very much under construction. The stores appeared to be open/complete, but all of the public areas were still cement floors/white painted plywood walls.

Unfortunately, I didnt think to take any pictures... (sorry)
Thanks! I did read that the new terrazzo flooring will be complete next year. No more click clack tile floor. Well at least in the airside center.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10736  
Old Posted Dec 16, 2014, 1:03 AM
AaronPGH's Avatar
AaronPGH AaronPGH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: PGH
Posts: 1,800
Quote:
Originally Posted by daviderik View Post
Thanks! I did read that the new terrazzo flooring will be complete next year. No more click clack tile floor. Well at least in the airside center.
The whole airport desperately needs an interior overhaul. It's insane to me that Denver airport opened only three years after PIT, yet it looks like it could have been built yesterday. A lot of my friends coming in from out of town comment on how terrible the place looks. I totally understand that money doesn't grow on trees and that the airport has a lot of other priorities, but at some point you need to *TRY* to put on a good impression to travelers. I think it's starting to become a real necessity to update. Compare and contrast:

DEN:



PIT:

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10737  
Old Posted Dec 16, 2014, 1:06 AM
AaronPGH's Avatar
AaronPGH AaronPGH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: PGH
Posts: 1,800
Anyone catch the rendering of the Holy LOL condo project? LOL.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10738  
Old Posted Dec 16, 2014, 1:45 AM
eschaton eschaton is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 5,608
Quote:
Originally Posted by AaronPGH View Post
Anyone catch the rendering of the Holy LOL condo project? LOL.

It's really a shame for that pixelated dude in the wheelchair they are deciding to convert 44th into a set of public steps.

Before, I thought it would seem petty to mention the developer is apparently the same group who are sending misleading fake "handwritten" letters to Lawrenceville residents to try and get them to sell their houses (off market). Now, I don't care so much.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10739  
Old Posted Dec 16, 2014, 2:46 AM
Minivan Werner Minivan Werner is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 498
Goodness.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10740  
Old Posted Dec 16, 2014, 3:34 AM
Jonboy1983's Avatar
Jonboy1983 Jonboy1983 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: The absolute western-most point of the Philadelphia urbanized area. :)
Posts: 1,721
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianTH View Post
Totally missed this:

http://www.post-gazette.com/opinion/2014...-Fayette-Expressway/stories/201412120038



That's actually an interesting proposal. By far the worst part of the MFE plan was that spur into Pittsburgh, which is probably dead for a variety of reasons. An extension of the Busway further east, on the other hand, is probably the single best bang for the buck idea that has been studied in recent years.

However, I personally wouldn't leap on this proposal quite yet. The other parts of the MFE are still extremely expensive, and may do more harm than good to the existing Mon Valley communities. I'd also suggest ending the Busway at East Pittsburgh is too short--it really should go all the way to at least Monroeville.

So it remains a better idea to just do that East Busway extension. However, with the way money sloshes around this state, this could end up being a compromise idea worth working on.

Edit: Oh wait, I do remember this:

http://www.post-gazette.com/local/region...orter-changes-lanes/stories/201307200135



If that is still the plan, screw that.
I never understood why they were still pushing for that leg when it was so unpopular among the residents of Braddock, Hazelwood, etc. This makes sense, altho I also agree that adding HOV traffic to the mix would be a bad idea...
Quote:
Originally Posted by AaronPGH View Post
The whole airport desperately needs an interior overhaul. It's insane to me that Denver airport opened only three years after PIT, yet it looks like it could have been built yesterday. A lot of my friends coming in from out of town comment on how terrible the place looks. I totally understand that money doesn't grow on trees and that the airport has a lot of other priorities, but at some point you need to *TRY* to put on a good impression to travelers. I think it's starting to become a real necessity to update. Compare and contrast:

DEN:



PIT:

The more that I think about it, the more that there really wasn't that much more interesting about the new PIT airport versus the old one. Moving walkways and people movers. To quote my mother-in-law: "wooooooooooooowww..."

For a second I thought that top pic was what they proposed to do with the current terminal.

Another terminal to compare (with DEN)? How about Kansai with its curved roof, steel and glass architectural features versus PIT's more brutalist 1970s-early 1980s architectural design?
__________________
Transportation planning, building better communities of tomorrow through superior connections between them today...
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:00 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.