HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Downtown & Urban Ottawa


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #181  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2014, 12:13 AM
HighwayStar's Avatar
HighwayStar HighwayStar is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: PHX (by way of YOW)
Posts: 1,199
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.OT13 View Post
If the Edmonton Oilers can get support some support from government (25 million I believe), I would expect Ottawa Senators could get a similar deal.
According to the City of Edmonton website, the city alone contributed $279m .. I didn't even search for province/feds.

http://www.edmonton.ca/city_governme...agreement.aspx
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #182  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2014, 12:19 AM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 27,610
Here's my biggest fear: Sens make a bid, they lose. 3 strikes your out. Melnyk will pack up and leave the bureaucratic mess that is Ottawa.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #183  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2014, 12:23 AM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,195
Quote:
If the move downtown takes place, Watson said the city would have to ensure the shift doesn’t leave a “significant void” in the Stittsville-Kanata West area. “Obviously, that’s a big employment generator and a magnet for a lot of activity.”
And how exactly is the City in any position to do that, Jim?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #184  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2014, 12:28 AM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 27,610
Quote:
Originally Posted by HighwayStar View Post
According to the City of Edmonton website, the city alone contributed $279m .. I didn't even search for province/feds.

http://www.edmonton.ca/city_governme...agreement.aspx
OK, so maybe I should stop checking Wikipeida.

According to your page, other governments contributed 39 million total.

For Ottawa, I could see the Feds give away the land the actual arena might sit on and the City could rezone the Corel Centre site so that Melnyk could make maximum profit on the sale. And since the City shot down the Sens two other proposals at the current site and since they did give away a 130 million dollar stadium, an arena and a huge swath of land to OSEG, I would expect Ottawa to hand over 100-200 million extra for the project.

That said, we don't know if the Sens will actually ask for funding. Multiple private companies approached them to work out a deal; who's to say part of that deal was "let's ask for public funding".
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #185  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2014, 12:33 AM
1overcosc's Avatar
1overcosc 1overcosc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 12,377
If this goes through we'd be eliminating two disasters with a single swoop: the barrenness of the Flats and the stupid location of the CTC.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #186  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2014, 1:07 AM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 27,610
So the guy who brought back NHL hockey to Ottawa and Built the CTC, Bruce Firestone, is saying that the lifespan of modern arenas is 25-35 years.

Quote:
“I think that you have to be thinking about the next generation,” said Bruce Firestone. “Most of these buildings are built with a 25-35-year life expectancy. This is not the pyramids we’re building here.”
http://www.obj.ca/Local/Sports-and-e...ial-new-home/1

So considering the obvious flaws with the current location, the multiple moth balled development plans around the arena and the fact that the vast parking lots would be worth more as residential subdivisions, it is entirely possible that the move to downtown makes financial sense.

Plus, by the time the new arena is built, which might take 8 to 10 years, the CTC will be around 30 years old and the ORT's phase two will have opened (two different events that benefit the new digs).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #187  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2014, 1:43 AM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 27,610
2009 OBJ article from Bruce Firestone on the reasons for the Corel Centre's location. The two biggest hits against downtown (transit and NCC opposition) at the time are pretty mcuh resolved.

Quote:
Why Scotiabank Place is in Kanata

Bruce FirestonePublished on April 27, 2009

I can't speak to the issue of what we should do with Lansdowne Park or whether a snow dump in Kanata should be the home to a new Major League Soccer team.

But I can answer the question – why is Scotiabank Place (SBP) where it is?

I get asked that a lot. Why isn't SBP at LeBreton Flats, Lansdowne Park, in Orleans somewhere along Highway 174, at South Keys, at Lac-Leamy in Gatineau or right downtown – much like the Bell Centre in Montreal or the Air Canada Centre in Toronto?

All of these locations were ones we looked at from 1987 to 1989, before we decided on the current location for the then-Palladium – in Kanata along Highway 417, with its "own" interchange.

First, here are a few observations primarily from Gino Rossetti, the Detroit-based architect who was the architect-of-record for the Palladium and who pioneered the concept of consecutive rings of suites with his successful first effort at stadium and arena design, the Palace of Auburn Hills where the Detroit Pistons play. A city needs an arena site that has:

- A large horizontal surface for parking;

- A site that is not less than 85 acres and preferably 100;

- Access to a major transportation corridor;

- Access to public transit;

- A site that would allow the structure to be half in the ground and half above the surface to distribute guests more efficiently and to make the building more human-scale.

Other things on our collective wish list included:

- Access at grade;

- Double-loaded storefronts at grade so that on days when the arena was dark, there would still be life in and around the facility;

- Opportunity for architectural signage to maximize that revenue stream;

- A curtain-wall entrance that left no doubt as to how to access the arena.

Let's first look at some of the alternative sites. LeBreton Flats is owned by the National Capital Commission, which informed us that it had a (very) long-term plan for the site that did not include an arena – it was just a rink to them. The NCC felt that national priorities such as a new museum (which turned out to be the War Museum) or a new Supreme Court of Canada building would take precedence.

We also looked at the Lac-Leamy site where the Casino du Lac-Leamy is now. It's a beautiful site, next to water, close to a major highway and just five minutes from the Parliamentary precinct. Better yet, it was for sale at the time.

But there were already two NHL teams in the Province of Quebec (unfortunately, the Nordiques have long since moved from Quebec City to Denver) and the majority of our potential fan base did not want a third team headquartered there while Ontario only had one team.

What about Lansdowne Park? There were two significant issues with that choice. Firstly, there are more lawyers living in the Glebe than practically anywhere else in Ottawa. How would they and the Glebe community react to another two million visitors descending on their neighbourhood? I can tell you from hard experience – not well. The planning for a new arena might have taken years to get approved, if ever.

Secondly, the NCC would never allow OC Transpo to run buses on Queen Elizabeth Drive. Hence, the only way to get people in and out by public transit would be Bank Street. The maximum number of people that OC can run up and down Bank Street would be about 2,500 pph (people per hour). For an arena with a 20,000 capacity, it would take four hours to exit everyone from the building using buses, if you were to rely on public transit for, say, 50 per cent of our attendance.

Now that tells you something about why the ACC and the Bell Centre are downtown arenas. We could have built the Palladium on a downtown site if Ottawa had a big-time people-mover like the Metro in Montreal or the subway in Toronto. Those two systems can move between 20,000 and 30,000 pph.

But I can tell you that if we relied on buses, we would have had one sellout – opening night. After that, there would have been a fan revolt.

In fact, people coming from Orleans by car could have taken more time to get to Lansdowne Park than to get to SBP, considering the traffic issues around the site.

So why not build a big, multi-level parking garage? Well, for the reason discussed above, you can't actually park more than 7,000 vehicles vertically. Since everyone will leave at the same second the team loses in overtime to the Maple Leafs, a multi-level garage will simply not work.

So I knew we needed a site we could own, that would have enough room for 7,000 cars and 500-plus buses on one level. The soil conditions had to be right to bury half the building. There had to be room for a new interchange and there had to be more than one way to get to the site. It couldn't be imposed on existing communities who would react in NIMBY fashion.

(Communities are now being built around SBP by Mattamy, Minto, Richcraft and others, but the key difference here is that people who buy these homes are self-selecting to be near SBP.)

We looked for a long time for an appropriate site and didn't find one – the Central Canada Exhibition Association (CCEA) did that for us.

The association had thought about moving from Lansdowne Park for some time. Its board actually found the site where SBP is now; one day I read in a local newspaper that the CCEA had optioned a site of some 500 to 600 acres at Huntmar and the Queensway. I jumped in my car and drove to the Huntmar overpass, and I stood on the bridge looking east. I could see the homes of Kanata marching like ants over Moodie Hill and I knew that the CCEA had beaten me to a great site.

I silently saluted them and cursed them, too.

I told the guys at Terrace Investments Ltd., the first parent company of the Sens. We were all disappointed.

But only a couple of months later, for reasons known only to the CCEA, its board decided to release its options on these lands. By 10 a.m., Jim Steele (still vice-president of broadcast with the Sens) and I were sitting in one of the local farmer's homes drinking rye and trying to convince the family to sell their lands to us.

Fortunately, many of these fine people did. We ended up with 600 acres.

We told only a few people what we were doing – Des Adam, then mayor of Kanata and Jimmy Durrell, mayor of Ottawa and Andy Haydon, RMOC chair.

We told them and then-premier of Ontario, David Peterson, that they each had a magic wand and we wanted them to use it – private money would buy the team ($50 million) and build the building ($240 million), but we needed three things from the government. One, we needed the 100-acre Palladium site and the remaining lands (500 acres) rezoned for a major community facility and other uses. Two, we needed public monies to fund the $30-million interchange because the day the interchange was completed, it would have to be given to the Ministry of Transportation for Ontario for $2.

Three, we needed their support to sell Ottawa to the NHL.

We asked them to focus their wands on the Palladium lands and, presto, the lands (after due process) would be rezoned. The average price we paid for the lands was $12,000 per acre and we made no secret of the fact that, after rezoning, we hoped the value would increase to $112,000 per acre (lands in the area are now trading for $300,000 to as much as $546,000 per acre).

The $100,000-per-acre increase in value, multiplied by the 500 acres of surplus land we had bought and planned to resell would equal the $50-million purchase price of NHL expansion.

But we told the guys we wouldn't keep that money – we'd take it to the NHL and in return, would get a piece of paper called a NHL franchise under the NHL's "plan of sixth expansion." We would put Ottawa on the map and it wouldn't cost the City of Ottawa a dime.

We won local votes in Kanata and at the RMOC by a margin of 32 to one and obtained the agreement of the Ontario Liberal government to our three requests. Things were looking pretty good in the summer of 1990.

But for some reason, Mr. Peterson decided to call an election two and a half years early and, with a nearly impossible splitting of the vote, Bob Rae and the NDP came to power later that summer.

As a result, after we won a conditional franchise for Ottawa in December 1990, we knew that we faced a brutal Ontario Municipal Board (OMB)hearing to face off with our own provincial government who would a) not support a franchise, b) use all their power to defeat the rezoning and c) not pay for any public infrastructure.

When our lawyer told us we were losing the hearing, I decided to make a public offer – if the OMB approved 100 acres for the Palladium, we would try to keep the other 500 acres in agricultural use for a generation. This would allow the NDP, hockey fans and Ottawa to find a win-win-win solution.

But the offer was rejected by the NDP and the matter was litigated to a conclusion – the board ruled that rezoning for the Palladium could proceed. But it was silent about the fate of the other 500 acres. Plus, we would have to pay for the new interchange. Consequently, we wrote down the value of our land holdings by $50 million and took another equity hit of $30 million (the value of the interchange).

That's why we have NHL hockey in Ottawa, why other people own those lands now and why yours truly is the Entrepreneur-in-Residence at the University of Ottawa's Telfer School of Management and real estate broker and not involved in hockey or land development.
http://www.obj.ca/Opinion/Bruce-Fire...is-in-Kanata/1

New OBJ article by Bruce Firestone commending the Sens looking into LB flats.

http://www.obj.ca/Local/Sports-and-e...ial-new-home/1
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #188  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2014, 2:21 AM
acottawa acottawa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 18,636
Interesting that Firestone hired the architect of one of the few suburban arenas built anywhere in North America in the last 40 years, who then claimed a suburban location was basically necessary. Meanwhile, lots of small cities with neither subways nor the things the architect told him he needed have built downtown arenas (Winnipeg, Buffalo, Pittsburgh, Nashville) or are planning them (Quebec, Las Vegas)

As someone with ticket's to tomorrow's game, trying to figure out how to get there in a snowy mess I am certainly keen for them to move, but I still don't see how Lebreton could get done. EM is either unable or unwilling to put much money into the team (Sens have the lowest payroll in the league most days). CTC probably doesn't have a lot of value (they would basically have to knock down the arena and sell the site as land unless somebody found a really creative use). Feds won't pay, province probably won't pay, city might pay, but probably not enough.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #189  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2014, 4:19 AM
phil235's Avatar
phil235 phil235 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 4,406
Quote:
Originally Posted by acottawa View Post
Interesting that Firestone hired the architect of one of the few suburban arenas built anywhere in North America in the last 40 years, who then claimed a suburban location was basically necessary. Meanwhile, lots of small cities with neither subways nor the things the architect told him he needed have built downtown arenas (Winnipeg, Buffalo, Pittsburgh, Nashville) or are planning them (Quebec, Las Vegas)

As someone with ticket's to tomorrow's game, trying to figure out how to get there in a snowy mess I am certainly keen for them to move, but I still don't see how Lebreton could get done. EM is either unable or unwilling to put much money into the team (Sens have the lowest payroll in the league most days). CTC probably doesn't have a lot of value (they would basically have to knock down the arena and sell the site as land unless somebody found a really creative use). Feds won't pay, province probably won't pay, city might pay, but probably not enough.
I've always thought that explanation for Kanata was nonsense. The primary reason for the Kanata location is that Firestone's group didn't have the money, and could only get the team with a massive real estate play.

That could also be the key to Lebreton. Assuming that the condo market bounces back at some point, the inclusion of condos and maybe a hotel in the project could provide a big chunk of the funding. Montreal and Toronto and Vancouver are all doing that with their arenas. And I wouldn't discount the revenue that a sale of the CTC and surrounding parking lots would bring in.

AS for the game tomorrow - take the bus. It's a good way to go, saves you parking and is much quicker on the way out.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #190  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2014, 1:53 PM
YOWflier's Avatar
YOWflier YOWflier is offline
Melissa: fabulous.
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: YOW/CYOW/CUUP
Posts: 3,159
Stumbling block #1 and we've not even begun: the great liberals on council won't support (financially) any such endeavour, starting with the captain of the ship.

Quote:
Originally Posted by article
Don’t count on the city to pony up, though.

“No, I wouldn’t support that,” Watson said.
http://ottawacitizen.com/news/local-...about-everyone

This, a position established without seeing any proposals, having any discussions/negotiations, assessing the cost vs the benefit, recognizing the importance of this "business" to the region ... nada.

Love it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #191  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2014, 2:01 PM
harls's Avatar
harls harls is offline
Mooderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Aylmer, Québec
Posts: 21,118
Quote:
That arena sure is magic the way it casts a shadow in the opposite direction.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #192  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2014, 2:13 PM
eemy's Avatar
eemy eemy is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,456
Quote:
Originally Posted by harls View Post
That arena sure is magic the way it casts a shadow in the opposite direction.
It's an optical illusion - the paving is just a different colour in that area.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #193  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2014, 2:19 PM
bikegypsy's Avatar
bikegypsy bikegypsy is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 985
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.OT13 View Post
Here's my biggest fear: Sens make a bid, they lose. 3 strikes your out. Melnyk will pack up and leave the bureaucratic mess that is Ottawa.
I disagree with you. Businessmen, especially very successful ones, are phenomenally resilient and take punches like real champs.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #194  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2014, 2:25 PM
bikegypsy's Avatar
bikegypsy bikegypsy is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 985
To me, the invitation by the NCC to propose something for Lebreton appears to be specifically tailored to attract a new arena.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #195  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2014, 2:40 PM
c_speed3108 c_speed3108 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,854
Quote:
Originally Posted by ButterMcFattyPants View Post
MSG diagram:
http://www.grayflannelsuit.net/blog/...arden-1967.jpg

Can we have bowling too?
Hey cool find!

I think a key thing (esp with respect to funding) is whether it is, like the Citizen's graphic, dropping an arena there or whether it is an actual city building exercise. This was a huge difference between the stadium project in Ottawa and the one in Hamilton.

With all the new condos going there plus the stuff on the Domtar lands that area could really use stuff like a grocery store...heck even a shoppers drug mart.

Many of these things could go below the arena. Another things would some sort of parking garage. The team would be able to sell parking 5 days a week..maybe in 7 days a week if there is enough good stuff in the complex. There would be all sorts of new revenue sources.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #196  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2014, 4:13 PM
kevinbottawa kevinbottawa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,240
Here's a blog post from Eric Darwin:

LeBetter Flats (part 3): when the Senators go marching in …
http://www.westsideaction.com/lebett...s-go-marching/

He has images showing where the arena could go:


Next to Booth


Right on top of the Transitway

He explains that the latter may be a better location due to the Sens timeline. It's a good post.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #197  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2014, 4:41 PM
Horus's Avatar
Horus Horus is offline
I ask because I Gatineau
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Aylmer (by way of GTA)
Posts: 1,210
Good article by Darwin - and I'm in agreement with the argument on the second proposed location.

However, Darwin's comparison to Boston and New York as examples of downtown arenas with little-to-no onsite parking as proof that you don't need onsite parking at a downtown arena is flawed.

Ottawa ain't Boston or New York, and LeBreton Flats is really not downtown.

The point was made that both Boston's TD Garden and MSG in NYC are on transit lines - same as the proposal for LeBreton. What's missing though is that both Boston's and NYC's arenas are built on multi-modal transit hubs which greatly extends the accessibility radius from those centres.

Furthermore, while each of the TD Garden and MSG sites have limited to little on-site parking, they are situated in downtown areas that have numerous nearby parking options, thereby negating the need to have onsite parking. This is the same as in Toronto and Montreal - the arenas have limited parking themselves, but there are literally 1000's of parking spots within a 5-10 minute walk of the site.

I like the idea of the LeBreton site for an NHL arena, but there are transportation issues. A single light-rail line is not going to be sufficient to get crowds to/from the arena, especially when access (read - parking) to the LRT line is also limited. If I'm coming from Gatineau, I can't think of a single place where I could park (easily) to access the arena directly, or to access the LRT to get to the LeBreton site. Ultimately the LRT expansion should improve access from the West end, but there will still be a need for enabling people to access the site in their personal vehicles. Unless the arena and related development has some provision for access to nearby parking, there will be problems.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #198  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2014, 4:58 PM
eternallyme eternallyme is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,243
Quote:
Originally Posted by Horus View Post
Good article by Darwin - and I'm in agreement with the argument on the second proposed location.

However, Darwin's comparison to Boston and New York as examples of downtown arenas with little-to-no onsite parking as proof that you don't need onsite parking at a downtown arena is flawed.

Ottawa ain't Boston or New York, and LeBreton Flats is really not downtown.

The point was made that both Boston's TD Garden and MSG in NYC are on transit lines - same as the proposal for LeBreton. What's missing though is that both Boston's and NYC's arenas are built on multi-modal transit hubs which greatly extends the accessibility radius from those centres.

Furthermore, while each of the TD Garden and MSG sites have limited to little on-site parking, they are situated in downtown areas that have numerous nearby parking options, thereby negating the need to have onsite parking. This is the same as in Toronto and Montreal - the arenas have limited parking themselves, but there are literally 1000's of parking spots within a 5-10 minute walk of the site.

I like the idea of the LeBreton site for an NHL arena, but there are transportation issues. A single light-rail line is not going to be sufficient to get crowds to/from the arena, especially when access (read - parking) to the LRT line is also limited. If I'm coming from Gatineau, I can't think of a single place where I could park (easily) to access the arena directly, or to access the LRT to get to the LeBreton site. Ultimately the LRT expansion should improve access from the West end, but there will still be a need for enabling people to access the site in their personal vehicles. Unless the arena and related development has some provision for access to nearby parking, there will be problems.
Multimodal hubs? I know for transit, within walking distance will be Bayview Station (connections south) and a short trip across the bridge to STO service (connections north).

If the City of Ottawa balks, I prefer a site immediately across the river in the old Domtar lands. But then all the benefits shift across the river...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #199  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2014, 5:10 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 27,610
Quote:
Originally Posted by ac888yow View Post
Stumbling block #1 and we've not even begun: the great liberals on council won't support (financially) any such endeavour, starting with the captain of the ship.



http://ottawacitizen.com/news/local-...about-everyone

This, a position established without seeing any proposals, having any discussions/negotiations, assessing the cost vs the benefit, recognizing the importance of this "business" to the region ... nada.

Love it.
Sad how the City jumped aboard a plan to fully finance the stadium (and basically gave away land for condos, retail and offices) for a third re-incarnation of a CFL team and an unproven NASL franchise while it won't pony up any kind of support to move our long standing NHL team downtown. Not surprising though, considering the City stood behind Rideau Carleton, a disposable business IMO, for the casino shafting our NHL team once more.

Plus, it seems the City might not support the move to save a few restaurants in Kanata.

I just don't get it, why City Hall seems to think everything is more important than the NHL.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #200  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2014, 5:47 PM
Aylmer's Avatar
Aylmer Aylmer is offline
Still optimistic
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Montreal (C-D-N) / Ottawa (Aylmer)
Posts: 5,408
I think that Lansdowne has demonstrated that major sporting events don't require parking. Heck, Lansdowne isn't even on any transit lines that could be considered rapid by any stretch of the imagination, but a Lebreton stadium would be on TWO metro lines (I still think LRT is a misleading term for what the confederation line will be) as well as several major roads.

By time this is built, people could park at Bayshore, Place d'Orleans, South Keys, Confederation and countless other places and be downtown in minutes at a rate of a stadium-full of people every 20 minutes (50 000p/h), not counting buses, pedestrians, cyclists, etc. In comparison, the 417's 3 lanes (almost everyone is coming from east of there, so I won't count the other three) have a theoretical capacity of a stadium every 3 hours (6 000p/h) with only enough parking for less than half a stadium (7000 spaces). Of course, that last point is moot since people just sit parked in the lanes of the 417
If you do take transit, it's in a low-capacity platoon of bunching buses if you're lucky and a long-arse trip to the furthest point in the city if the special event buses aren't running.


I don't know, but it looks to me like the major transportation problem isn't in LeBreton, it's in Kanata and anything would be an improvement.
__________________
I've always struggled with reality. And I'm pleased to say that I won.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Downtown & Urban Ottawa
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:03 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.