HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #7541  
Old Posted Nov 30, 2014, 9:57 PM
dpogue dpogue is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 762
Video from yesterday morning approaching Lougheed Station. Apologies for the quality, I swear the train window had never been washed


I also took some photos of the station construction:

The mall-side west entrance.


The platform-level glass from behind. (That support pad for the original roof design looks so out of place )


The west side platform entrance area.


The new down-escalator being installed to service the existing platforms in the west station house.


The west side platform entrance area, from the existing platform.


Designated side walkways being installed on the new outbound guideway.


Not nearly as much progress on the east station house.

I'm still hoping that at some point they paint all the metal surfaces of the new platform with the same grey colour as the existing station, but I'm not counting on it. They're also using much more generic-looking supports for the glass panels than the semi-iconic ones throughout the rest of the station. I fear this is definitely going to look like an obvious addition at the end, rather than a seamless extension
     
     
  #7542  
Old Posted Nov 30, 2014, 10:22 PM
VancouverOfTheFuture's Avatar
VancouverOfTheFuture VancouverOfTheFuture is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 3,481
Quote:
Originally Posted by dpogue View Post
I also took some photos of the station construction:

The platform-level glass from behind. (That support pad for the original roof design looks so out of place )

They're also using much more generic-looking supports for the glass panels than the semi-iconic ones throughout the rest of the station. I fear this is definitely going to look like an obvious addition at the end, rather than a seamless extension
is there a reason why they didn't go with the original design? since it was already roughed in why not just continue with the original plans. they obviously had them in a book somewhere. they could have just blown the dust off and have been done.
     
     
  #7543  
Old Posted Nov 30, 2014, 11:19 PM
Meraki Meraki is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 473
Quote:
Originally Posted by VancouverOfTheFuture View Post
is there a reason why they didn't go with the original design? since it was already roughed in why not just continue with the original plans. they obviously had them in a book somewhere. they could have just blown the dust off and have been done.
The architects of it were part of the consortium that lost to SNC-Lavalin.
     
     
  #7544  
Old Posted Dec 1, 2014, 1:23 AM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 17,887
They should put a lamp post or a sign or something on that unused support, just to make it blend in. Heck, even a potted plant on top would make it look better.
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/30634635@N03/with/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0_0h9qKlhxXFxuAey_q6Q
     
     
  #7545  
Old Posted Dec 1, 2014, 3:16 AM
queetz@home's Avatar
queetz@home queetz@home is offline
Go Rotem! Die Bombardier!
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Ortigas
Posts: 3,679
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro-One View Post
They should put a lamp post or a sign or something on that unused support, just to make it blend in. Heck, even a potted plant on top would make it look better.
Nuts to that! That little piece of ugliness should remain as a constant reminder of Ujahl Dosanj's greatest f*ckup for not building the line as scheduled, or at the very least allowing Translink to collect that measley $75 vehicle levy while they were in power.
     
     
  #7546  
Old Posted Dec 1, 2014, 9:55 AM
officedweller officedweller is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,439
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro-One View Post
They should put a lamp post or a sign or something on that unused support, just to make it blend in. Heck, even a potted plant on top would make it look better.
Agreed, an art piece would look good.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dpogue View Post

Designated side walkways being installed on the new outbound guideway.
(
They'd have to have emergency catwalks on each of the [uneven] single track guideways - until they merge at North Road.
     
     
  #7547  
Old Posted Dec 1, 2014, 3:28 PM
dpogue dpogue is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 762
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
They'd have to have emergency catwalks on each of the [uneven] single track guideways - until they merge at North Road.
It appears that the walkways will the on the left side (from the perspective of looking east from the Lougheed platform) of the outbound guideway all the way around the curve. For the inbound guideway they start off on the left due to the walkways for the existing M-Line inbound track, but it looks like they'll move to the right about mid-curve. Once it straightens out along North Road, they should both join as a centre walkway until the switches at Burquitlam.
     
     
  #7548  
Old Posted Dec 1, 2014, 7:50 PM
nname nname is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,067
I think we all already know, but here is the official current TBM location

Seems like its about 1/3 completed.
     
     
  #7549  
Old Posted Dec 1, 2014, 8:05 PM
officedweller officedweller is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,439
Quote:
Originally Posted by dpogue View Post
It appears that the walkways will the on the left side (from the perspective of looking east from the Lougheed platform) of the outbound guideway all the way around the curve. For the inbound guideway they start off on the left due to the walkways for the existing M-Line inbound track, but it looks like they'll move to the right about mid-curve. Once it straightens out along North Road, they should both join as a centre walkway until the switches at Burquitlam.
Thanks.
I was trying to see where it was on your video and was wondering if there was enough space between the guideways for a single catwalk.
     
     
  #7550  
Old Posted Dec 2, 2014, 7:43 AM
dpogue dpogue is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 762
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
Thanks.
I was trying to see where it was on your video and was wondering if there was enough space between the guideways for a single catwalk.
I might stand corrected about the walkway changing sides on the inbound guideway. There were some safety supports along the side that looked like walkways, but it seems both walkways will be fully on the inside of the curve.

But you are definitely not the only one questioning the space constraints of those walkways
     
     
  #7551  
Old Posted Dec 2, 2014, 8:27 PM
officedweller officedweller is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,439
Nice that the outside of the curve will remain clean-looking.
     
     
  #7552  
Old Posted Dec 5, 2014, 9:34 PM
queetz@home's Avatar
queetz@home queetz@home is offline
Go Rotem! Die Bombardier!
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Ortigas
Posts: 3,679
From Tri Cities Now...

http://www.thenownews.com/news/traffic-t...-around-evergreen-construction-1.1651411

Quote:
As for 2015, the first part of the year will be spent completing the elevated guideways, boring the tunnel and finishing the at-grade guideway along the rail line. Once those jobs are complete, the focus will be on installing the track and systems and outfitting the stations, with work on the plazas and landscaping to be done later in the year.

By the second half of 2015, residents should start to see the first trains being tested on the track.
Any chance they can start service by labour day of 2015?
     
     
  #7553  
Old Posted Dec 5, 2014, 10:27 PM
SOSS SOSS is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 661
With the tunnel only 1/3 excavated, I'd imagine we're only going to see trains being tested to the first station by the time-frame they've outlined. They can't install anything within the tunnel until Alice is done.
     
     
  #7554  
Old Posted Dec 5, 2014, 11:16 PM
Kwik-E-Mart Kwik-E-Mart is offline
A.H.-Ha!
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Cambie Village, Van City
Posts: 348
Quote:
Originally Posted by queetz@home View Post
From Tri Cities Now...

http://www.thenownews.com/news/traffic-t...-around-evergreen-construction-1.1651411



Any chance they can start service by labour day of 2015?
By second half, it can be anywhere between July to December 2015.

Track testing and system integration can take several months. Even if all the tracks are laid by July 1, 2015, there is still not enough time for them to open the line on Labour Day.

Most likely scenario will be
1. Track testing by September or October. Also will ask EGRT to speed up construction of stations, if they are behind schedule.
2. Line opening by April 2016, a few days to the provincial election date.
3. More brownie points for Christy for completing the line early.

Last edited by Kwik-E-Mart; Dec 5, 2014 at 11:53 PM.
     
     
  #7555  
Old Posted Dec 6, 2014, 10:57 PM
jsbertram jsbertram is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,245
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kwik-E-Mart View Post
By second half, it can be anywhere between July to December 2015.

Track testing and system integration can take several months. Even if all the tracks are laid by July 1, 2015, there is still not enough time for them to open the line on Labour Day.

Most likely scenario will be
1. Track testing by September or October. Also will ask EGRT to speed up construction of stations, if they are behind schedule.
2. Line opening by April 2016, a few days to the provincial election date.
3. More brownie points for Christy for completing the line early.
Isn't the next BC election May, 2017?
Still gives Clark & co a lot of time to say "do you like the new Evergreen line? You want more transit? re-elect us!"
     
     
  #7556  
Old Posted Dec 6, 2014, 11:19 PM
aberdeen5698's Avatar
aberdeen5698 aberdeen5698 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 4,769
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsbertram View Post
Isn't the next BC election May, 2017?
Still gives Clark & co a lot of time to say ... You want more transit? re-elect us!"
That'd be nice change...
     
     
  #7557  
Old Posted Dec 7, 2014, 1:47 AM
adrianroam95 adrianroam95 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Coquitlam, BC
Posts: 214
I was unable to take a picture, but as of this afternoon, they were connecting guideway segments over Barnet Highway at Pinetree Way. Exciting to see the progress they're making with the guideway.
     
     
  #7558  
Old Posted Dec 7, 2014, 10:32 PM
Kwik-E-Mart Kwik-E-Mart is offline
A.H.-Ha!
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Cambie Village, Van City
Posts: 348
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsbertram View Post
Isn't the next BC election May, 2017?
Still gives Clark & co a lot of time to say "do you like the new Evergreen line? You want more transit? re-elect us!"
Whoops, my bad!

Quote:
Originally Posted by adrianroam95 View Post
I was unable to take a picture, but as of this afternoon, they were connecting guideway segments over Barnet Highway at Pinetree Way. Exciting to see the progress they're making with the guideway.
Voila! (Credit: me)

     
     
  #7559  
Old Posted Dec 7, 2014, 11:15 PM
SOSS SOSS is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 661
Wow that was fast. I drove past there just Friday morning and there was nothing. Now look. Crazy fast.
     
     
  #7560  
Old Posted Dec 10, 2014, 3:11 AM
SOSS SOSS is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 661
So happy we're not having Bertha issues with Alice (unless they're not telling us).

Sinking soil halts work at Seattle tunnel repair project

SEATTLE (AP) - There are more problems for the Highway 99 tunnel project beneath downtown Seattle, as engineers study whether settling soil means work should be altered on a pit being dug to reach a stalled digging machine known as Bertha.

Tests over the weekend showed the settling around the pit is uneven, the Department of Transportation said.

No differential settling, which is potentially risky for structures, was detected on the Alaskan Way Viaduct, which remains safe for travel, the department said Monday.

The settling near the pit is apparently the result of groundwater pumped out by Seattle Tunnel Partners as it digs a 120-foot access pit to reach and replace the damaged head of the boring machine.

Bertha overheated and stopped a year ago. It has drilled about 10 percent of the way into a planned 2-mile tunnel to replace the viaduct.

State engineers are analyzing the settling data to make sure the pit, viaduct and nearby buildings are secure. On Sunday, the state said pumping necessary to reduce water pressure on the pit would be stopped. However on Monday, Laura Newborn, spokeswoman for the viaduct replacement project, said the dewatering was continuing.

Seattle Tunnel Partners had told the state it planned to resume tunneling in April on the $2 billion project. It's already about a year behind schedule. The opening was previously scheduled for December 2015.

Bertha is stuck about 60 feet under a street not far from the Seattle waterfront. To remove the 57-foot diameter cutting head, the 80-foot-diameter access pit needs to be about 120 feet deep. It's currently about 70 feet deep.

Engineers last week said the viaduct had sunk about an inch in the past month. That's in addition to earlier sinking after the 2001 Nisqually earthquake.

The risk of the 61-year-old viaduct collapsing in an earthquake is one reason the state pushed for the tunnel replacement project to carry Highway 99 traffic through the city. The viaduct carries about 100,000 vehicles a day.

Work on the access pit was stopped for several weeks this fall after clam shells were uncovered. Experts determined they were not archaeologically significant.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:44 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.