HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #10481  
Old Posted Dec 3, 2014, 2:45 PM
Austinlee's Avatar
Austinlee Austinlee is offline
Chillin' in The Burgh
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Spring Hill, Pittsburgh
Posts: 12,488
^It looks very stately. I like it.
__________________
Check out the latest developments in Pittsburgh:
Pittsburgh Rundown III
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10482  
Old Posted Dec 3, 2014, 2:48 PM
Austinlee's Avatar
Austinlee Austinlee is offline
Chillin' in The Burgh
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Spring Hill, Pittsburgh
Posts: 12,488
Guys, this is beyond huge news for the Northside. The Buhl foundation is investing up to $60 million to fight poverty and help young kids get a better start in life. Also with positive activities they can take part in. In the process of taking neighborhood polls they leveraged that money to get at least 1,000 Northside residents to pledge 2 hours per month to help others.
I am very impressed. This is a huge commitment of time and money to an area already on the upswing. As a new resident to the Northside as of about 4 months ago, I will try to donate some time as well.
http://www.post-gazette.com/local/city/2...-sets-a-20-year-pla/stories/201412030017
__________________
Check out the latest developments in Pittsburgh:
Pittsburgh Rundown III
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10483  
Old Posted Dec 3, 2014, 3:06 PM
BrianTH BrianTH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,078
City Council is moving forward with the dynamic parking idea:

http://triblive.com/news/adminpage/7288518-74/parking-rates-dynamic#axzz3KqIFDbML

Quote:
Parking rates and enforcement hours would fluctuate based on demand in Downtown Pittsburgh and a dozen other neighborhoods under legislation City Council introduced Tuesday. . . . Targeted neighborhoods include Oakland, Shadyside, Strip District, North Side, South Side, Squirrel Hill, Uptown Brookline, Mt. Washington, Bloomfield, Garfield and East Liberty. . . . Dynamic rates would be set by Finance Director Paul Leger, who could also extend meter enforcement to 10 p.m., according to the legislation.

Two Carnegie Mellon University professors tested a dynamic parking system in 400 spaces around the Oakland campus and found that it triggered greater availability while generating more revenue.
This is very good policy, but I predict there will be at least some push back from the crowd who thinks any increase in parking revenue means the City is screwing non-residents and discouraging such people from visiting or working in the City. The idea of extended enforcement hours is also a red flag for such people.

What they generally don't understand is that part of the idea here is to offer lower rates in slightly less convenient locations, which increases utilization of those spaces and improves availability in the most convenient locations. This increases utilization overall and that is what drives revenues higher. Here is a CMU article laying that all out:

http://www.cmu.edu/homepage/computing/2014/summer/performance-parking.shtml

Quote:
Before 2012, the price of parking near Carnegie Mellon's Pittsburgh campus was inexpensive, but finding spots to park during peak hours was difficult. When the Pittsburgh Parking Authority raised rates in January 2012, the streets emptied. . . . That's when Fichman, an associate professor of organizational behavior, sought out Spear, a professor of economics. . . . The duo culled thousands of entries in a database created by the kiosks. Using that information, they determined current occupancy rates and asked the Pittsburgh Parking Authority to adjust prices accordingly. "The peripheral streets remained empty, so we lowered those prices," Fichman said. "We had signs made that say 'economy parking' or 'premium parking,' and the city installed them."
. . .
Within six months, the professors found prices that filled spaces to around 80 percent of capacity. Revenues went up and occupancy rates on streets in high demand dropped, leaving spots open for the occasional student (or professor) scrambling to make an 8 a.m. class. . . . "It's a huge improvement now that the multi-space meters have come in that they can now change the prices over the wireless internet," Spear said, adding that as these technologies mature, municipalities will work on improving optimization, which in turn will ease congestion and improve convenience for drivers. "If you can hit all three of those targets at once, that's a great thing," he said.
That target of 80% utilization is sort of a best practices standard for street parking (it is consistent with people usually being able to find a spot quickly if they want one, but not leaving so many spots open that prices have acted as a major deterrent). And if they are hitting a high utilization rate, that means they are in fact attracting a lot of parkers, AND making the most efficient use of the most convenient locations (the same logic that applies to a student/professor rushing to make a class also applies to a shopper trying to pop into a store, or a person trying to make a dinner date, or so on).

And on top of all that, as alluded to briefly, hitting that 80% target can mean a lot less of people driving around trying to find a parking spot in their preferred location (whether that is because it is most convenient, or the cheapest around, or any mix in between). That can be a very large source of congestion in certain areas, and it is also bad for the environment, bad for local businesses and pedestrians, and so on.

Last edited by BrianTH; Dec 3, 2014 at 3:21 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10484  
Old Posted Dec 3, 2014, 3:12 PM
BrianTH BrianTH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,078
Quote:
Originally Posted by Austinlee View Post
^It looks very stately. I like it.
Agreed--it is a nice, classy, historic-feeling addition to that area.

I didn't get a good picture of this, but the lighting on the 6th Avenue side is also really nice--the lobby behind the ornamental entrance was lit up, along with the facade using up lights, and it was all very warm and inviting. They are still working on the Cherry Way side, but I can now envision the overall look and I think it is going to be great, particularly at night (a dark law firm office is not necessarily the most inviting sight at night).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10485  
Old Posted Dec 3, 2014, 3:17 PM
BrianTH BrianTH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,078
Quote:
Originally Posted by Austinlee View Post
In the process of taking neighborhood polls they leveraged that money to get at least 1,000 Northside residents to pledge 2 hours per month to help others. I am very impressed. This is a huge commitment of time and money to an area already on the upswing. As a new resident to the Northside as of about 4 months ago, I will try to donate some time as well.
That's great! The North Side already has a lot going for it, but it also still has so much untapped potential. I loved the news last year that the Buhl Foundation was shifting its focus there, and it is also great they are helping to unify the diverse existing community around a well-balanced set of priorities.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10486  
Old Posted Dec 3, 2014, 5:16 PM
AaronPGH's Avatar
AaronPGH AaronPGH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: PGH
Posts: 1,800
The green on the Hotel Monaco sign is bugging me a little bit, but I dig it otherwise. I probably would have gone with something like polished aluminum - tad classier. But, VERY nice to see the thing pulling together like that!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10487  
Old Posted Dec 3, 2014, 11:41 PM
chiaroscuro chiaroscuro is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianTH View Post
Agreed--it is a nice, classy, historic-feeling addition to that area.

I didn't get a good picture of this, but the lighting on the 6th Avenue side is also really nice--the lobby behind the ornamental entrance was lit up, along with the facade using up lights, and it was all very warm and inviting. They are still working on the Cherry Way side, but I can now envision the overall look and I think it is going to be great, particularly at night (a dark law firm office is not necessarily the most inviting sight at night).
Will it have a first floor bar/restaurant?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10488  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2014, 1:14 AM
daviderik daviderik is offline
Hell with the Lid Off.
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 305
Speaking of Hotel Monaco. The PG has an article about a bunch of restaurants opening up in and around town. The Commoner Restaurant is talked about plus a slew of eateries opening up in Lawrenceville.

http://www.post-gazette.com/life/dining/...d-life&utm_campaign=Headlines-Newsletter
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10489  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2014, 3:29 AM
Gilamonster Gilamonster is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 463
Speaking of hotels, remodeling for the Distrikt Hotel to be in the Salvation Army Building downtown has started. Also, I'm wondering when work on the two Forza hotels will start. The Holiday Inn on Fort Pitt is dealing with Nimby issues and their decent sized 15 story Hampton Inn planned below the Duquesne Incline may be delayed due to the summer landslides. I can't even find anything online about the Hampton Inn getting city planning commission approval.
__________________
An optimist and a pessimist have one common viewpoint; their dislike of a realist.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10490  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2014, 4:04 AM
Jonboy1983's Avatar
Jonboy1983 Jonboy1983 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: The absolute western-most point of the Philadelphia urbanized area. :)
Posts: 1,721
Quote:
Originally Posted by chiaroscuro View Post
Will it have a first floor bar/restaurant?
I believe it will. I forget what they're calling the one in this Monaco, but I treated my wife to the Hotel Monaco in Baltimore. Their restaurant is called the B&O American Brasserie, something pretty high-end in my opinion. Dinner is easily a hundred bucks or so for two people. Not to mention, you can get room service for breakfast from there as well. Given that, I imagine it's something they do at every Kimpton.

They're also going to have a manager's wine reception every night at 5 pm. That is a Kimpton thing.

Based on my experience at the Monaco in Baltimore, this hotel is rather whimsical but very upscale. Could be popular among those wishing to stroll over to the Strip or down to the Cultural District.

Ah, as someone else posted above, it is going to be called The Commoner, and holy smokes it looks nice!
__________________
Transportation planning, building better communities of tomorrow through superior connections between them today...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10491  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2014, 5:39 AM
psuhoops123's Avatar
psuhoops123 psuhoops123 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 27
Meh

I would've liked Monaco better if they had larger, white, san serif font vertically like you see in New York on Broadway. It would've looked bolder but yet sophisticated. But i guess this will do
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10492  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2014, 12:11 PM
BrianTH BrianTH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,078
Article on the efforts to turn the Union Trust Building into a Class A building with a tech focus:

http://www.post-gazette.com/local/city/2...with-techie-tenants/stories/201412040177

They've already got a couple new tenants (taking what will undoubtedly be the prime two-story suites with atriums on the top floors), and they are planning lots of renovations, including new underground parking and new retail, all while preserving and restoring the historic elements.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10493  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2014, 12:26 PM
BrianTH BrianTH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,078
The Highland on Penn project got some pushback for destroying the historic facades, but not enough to actually prevent demolition approval:

http://triblive.com/news/allegheny/7295626-74/east-liberty-buildings#axzz3Kk4TYOIE

Quote:
The planning commission approved Walnut Capital's demolition and construction plans with caveats. Conditions include requiring the developer to catalogue and preserve the old buildings' facades and to come up with a plan to use more elements of the facades in the new construction.
This continues an ugly trend of treating such recycling plans as a substitute for in-place preservation, which is very much missing the point of historic preservation in historic districts.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10494  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2014, 2:25 PM
Evergrey's Avatar
Evergrey Evergrey is offline
Eurosceptic
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 24,141
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianTH View Post
The Highland on Penn project got some pushback for destroying the historic facades, but not enough to actually prevent demolition approval:

http://triblive.com/news/allegheny/7295626-74/east-liberty-buildings#axzz3Kk4TYOIE



This continues an ugly trend of treating such recycling plans as a substitute for in-place preservation, which is very much missing the point of historic preservation in historic districts.
I love these quotes.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trib
“We wish every building could be preserved, but sometimes that can't be done. You have to take a reasoned approach,” said Walnut Capital President Todd Reidbord.

East Liberty Development Inc. owns the buildings targeted for demolition, including the former home of Bolan's Candies. Ironically, the agency bought them in 2006 to save them from being razed for a parking lot.

“I think after eight years of struggling with them, it's time to move forward,” said ELDI investment officer Skip Schwab, noting the group spends about $9,000 a month to hold onto the buildings. Two previous attempts to redevelop them failed.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10495  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2014, 3:21 PM
Brentsters Brentsters is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: chicago
Posts: 249
Speaking of reusing facades as wall art, Point Park is announcing their playhouse plans right now.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10496  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2014, 3:35 PM
East Edge's Avatar
East Edge East Edge is offline
World Class City
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 145
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianTH View Post
City Council is moving forward with the dynamic parking idea:

http://triblive.com/news/adminpage/7288518-74/parking-rates-dynamic#axzz3KqIFDbML



This is very good policy, but I predict there will be at least some push back from the crowd who thinks any increase in parking revenue means the City is screwing non-residents and discouraging such people from visiting or working in the City. The idea of extended enforcement hours is also a red flag for such people.

What they generally don't understand is that part of the idea here is to offer lower rates in slightly less convenient locations, which increases utilization of those spaces and improves availability in the most convenient locations. This increases utilization overall and that is what drives revenues higher. Here is a CMU article laying that all out:

http://www.cmu.edu/homepage/computing/2014/summer/performance-parking.shtml



That target of 80% utilization is sort of a best practices standard for street parking (it is consistent with people usually being able to find a spot quickly if they want one, but not leaving so many spots open that prices have acted as a major deterrent). And if they are hitting a high utilization rate, that means they are in fact attracting a lot of parkers, AND making the most efficient use of the most convenient locations (the same logic that applies to a student/professor rushing to make a class also applies to a shopper trying to pop into a store, or a person trying to make a dinner date, or so on).

And on top of all that, as alluded to briefly, hitting that 80% target can mean a lot less of people driving around trying to find a parking spot in their preferred location (whether that is because it is most convenient, or the cheapest around, or any mix in between). That can be a very large source of congestion in certain areas, and it is also bad for the environment, bad for local businesses and pedestrians, and so on.
I know this is not a bricks and mortar development discussion but this sucks ass! Leave it alone! after 6pm FREE period. I got a parking ticket in the south side last week and it was $120!! (if you get it in right away) after that its higher. Common sense would say that when people are going out to dinner and meeting friends and had to park 3 blocks away in the winter that the last thing that they have on their minds to do excuse themselves, get bundled up again, head out and race to the nearest pay station and throw more money on the system. If you're having fun as you should when you're out you could easily loose track of time and end up getting a ticket. 1 or two of those and see you later Lawrenceville and Southside!! Customers will stop coming back.

This is a very short sighted way of trying to squeeze more money out of people but its only going to backfire once people start getting pissed off and going elsewhere to shop and dine where parking is free or more convenient.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10497  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2014, 3:56 PM
Evergrey's Avatar
Evergrey Evergrey is offline
Eurosceptic
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 24,141
Quote:
Originally Posted by East Edge View Post
after 6pm FREE period.
I agree. I think evening enforcement will have many negative externalities.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10498  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2014, 4:24 PM
JVC JVC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 274
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianTH View Post
The Highland on Penn project got some pushback for destroying the historic facades, but not enough to actually prevent demolition approval:

http://triblive.com/news/allegheny/7295626-74/east-liberty-buildings#axzz3Kk4TYOIE

This continues an ugly trend of treating such recycling plans as a substitute for in-place preservation, which is very much missing the point of historic preservation in historic districts.
does anyone have an explanation for why this building does not have a front door for residents?
i realize it was designed so that the residents enter the building through a back door in the alley.
what i do not understand is why it does not have a front door

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10499  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2014, 4:29 PM
Evergrey's Avatar
Evergrey Evergrey is offline
Eurosceptic
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 24,141
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianTH View Post


This continues an ugly trend of treating such recycling plans as a substitute for in-place preservation, which is very much missing the point of historic preservation in historic districts.


http://www.bizjournals.com/pittsburgh/ne...k-unveils-design-for-new-pittsburgh.html


Quote:
Point Park unveils design for new Pittsburgh Playhouse

Dec 4, 2014, 11:01am EST

On Thursday, Point Park University unveiled the design for its $74 million Pittsburgh Playhouse project.

The 92,000-square-foot facility, which will span nearly two acres of land along the Forbes Avenue corridor between Wood and Smithfield streets, will incorporate the Stock Exchange Building, as well as Point Park's current University Center, which is made up of four buildings, the oldest of which dates back to 1893.

Point Park said while the buildings at 320, 322 and 330 Forbes Avenue will be deconstructed to make way for the Playhouse, the facades from each will play "a significant part of the two-story, outdoor courtyard." The university has been working with Landmark Design Associates, which has been documenting the facades to carefully dismantle and reinstall the facades.

...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10500  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2014, 5:01 PM
Urbana's Avatar
Urbana Urbana is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 580
Renderings:









I must say they did a better job than I ever thought they would. The design of the building is actually quite nice and the facade placement is only slightly less than ideal for my tastes at least.

source: http://www.pointpark.edu/news.aspx?id=1371
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:35 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.