Quote:
Originally Posted by GlassCity
You don't like graffiti but you like overhead viaducts? Poorly done graffiti is ugly but good graffiti is awesome and makes a city look alive. Viaducts look cold and utilitarian to me.
|
Viaducts are infrastructure that are maintained (or at least should be) and add layers to an urban space, and they can be merged into the urban fabric in interesting ways (this project is the perfect example, as is Granville Island, the Cambie Street Bridge, and the skytrain viaduct in many places). Agreed that you do need proper lighting and other factors in place to make a viaduct much more welcoming. Also the area has to be kept clean
Grafitti is vandlism and ranges from a sprawling mess to beautiful. often, the beautiful ones are sanctioned by the city / property owner and do add character to the city.
Sadly, most of it is ugly tagging that covers up info signs, park benches, nice masonry work, clean walls, way finder systems, safety systems, acid eched windows, etc... and makes an area look and feel dangerous for many many people. It has been proven that areas cleaned of grafitti actually have their crime rates fall, and urban aspects (such as transit systems) cleaned of grafitti are far more welcoming to a much wider range of users.
Now, art grafitti is welcomed (if sanctioned) but vandalism grafitti is a selfish blight.