HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #12701  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2014, 5:39 AM
ninjakafi_81 ninjakafi_81 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 342
Quote:
Originally Posted by GlassCity View Post
Thank you so much!
You're welcome

If these buses come out tomorrow, I'll try riding it and post the experience in this thread. Also I'll probably get a recording as well, so I'll post the link of that video later in this thread as well.
     
     
  #12702  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2014, 6:05 AM
GlassCity's Avatar
GlassCity GlassCity is offline
Rational urbanist
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Metro Vancouver
Posts: 5,270
that'd be awesome!
     
     
  #12703  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2014, 7:44 AM
MIPS's Avatar
MIPS MIPS is offline
SkyTrain Nut
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Kamloops
Posts: 2,117
I got out of bed just in time to see that CTV spinning the report around on the late night news. As someone who works on embedded systems I really hate this mentality that because the hardware is not modern it's not capable of doing the work reliably and should be replaced. They make it sound like you'll have an aneurysm if you found out there's still systems in this city still running on Zilog Z80's.


Last edited by MIPS; Nov 19, 2014 at 9:32 AM.
     
     
  #12704  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2014, 5:48 PM
aberdeen5698's Avatar
aberdeen5698 aberdeen5698 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 4,805
Quote:
Originally Posted by MIPS View Post
As someone who works on embedded systems I really hate this mentality that because the hardware is not modern it's not capable of doing the work reliably and should be replaced.
Old hardware is fine as long as it keeps working. The biggest issue is finding someone who knows how to deal with it when it fails. That's not such a big deal if it's a black box part that can be replaced as a whole unit, but otherwise it can be expensive to retain staff with specialized knowledge and stock relevant parts or pay for service contracts when the vendor is using pricing to try to move you to newer generations of equipment (in order to make some sales). Or heaven forbid if the vendor no longer exists or had dropped support for your equipment. Ultimately, even if reliability isn't the primary driver, it will still end up being a support vs. replacement cost issue.
     
     
  #12705  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2014, 7:00 PM
Kisai Kisai is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 1,154
Quote:
Originally Posted by aberdeen5698 View Post
Old hardware is fine as long as it keeps working. The biggest issue is finding someone who knows how to deal with it when it fails. That's not such a big deal if it's a black box part that can be replaced as a whole unit, but otherwise it can be expensive to retain staff with specialized knowledge and stock relevant parts or pay for service contracts when the vendor is using pricing to try to move you to newer generations of equipment (in order to make some sales). Or heaven forbid if the vendor no longer exists or had dropped support for your equipment. Ultimately, even if reliability isn't the primary driver, it will still end up being a support vs. replacement cost issue.
Consider that Thales owns the Seltrac technology, and uses the Skytrain in it's marketing, and it's the most popular CBTC being selected.
https://www.thalesgroup.com/sites/defaul...nt/SelTracBrochure_CBTCSolutions_eng.pdf

Here's an older version:
http://www.tsd.org/cbtc/Suppliers/Alcatel/SelTracBrochure.pdf
(Also has the Skytrain in the marketing)
Quote:
SELTRAC S 4 0 :
S30 FUNCTIONALITY PLUS...
• Unattended or driver/attended operation including
cab-signaling modes
• Logic or Moving-block technology
• Automatic performance modification
(including speed and station dwell)
• Fully redundant train-to-wayside configurations
• Fully protected bi-directional operation
(requiring no additional hardware)
• Can include solid-state interlocking and remote
switch control
• High availability
• Automatic route setting
• Quick-start reset
• Can include automatic coupling/uncoupling
Gee, this suggests the feature wasn't optional.

Of interest, CBTC only became standardized in like 1999, revised in 2004
http://standards.ieee.org/findstds/standard/1474.1-2004.html

And all the software engineering parts that make up CBTC
http://www.disit.org/axmedis/ee7/00000-e...ee7f21f3-dccf-4f84-90a9-543ecc81e4d1.pdf

Like, I don't know what an upgrade actually involves. Does it involve just a software upgrade, or replacing the VCC's entirely? Does it involve switching from induction loops to WiFi? Are the VOBC's replaced or just the communication parts?
     
     
  #12706  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2014, 8:04 PM
cabotp cabotp is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 2,813
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kisai View Post
Consider that Thales owns the Seltrac technology, and uses the Skytrain in it's marketing, and it's the most popular CBTC being selected.
https://www.thalesgroup.com/sites/defaul...nt/SelTracBrochure_CBTCSolutions_eng.pdf

Here's an older version:
http://www.tsd.org/cbtc/Suppliers/Alcatel/SelTracBrochure.pdf
(Also has the Skytrain in the marketing)


Gee, this suggests the feature wasn't optional.

Of interest, CBTC only became standardized in like 1999, revised in 2004
http://standards.ieee.org/findstds/standard/1474.1-2004.html

And all the software engineering parts that make up CBTC
http://www.disit.org/axmedis/ee7/00000-e...ee7f21f3-dccf-4f84-90a9-543ecc81e4d1.pdf

Like, I don't know what an upgrade actually involves. Does it involve just a software upgrade, or replacing the VCC's entirely? Does it involve switching from induction loops to WiFi? Are the VOBC's replaced or just the communication parts?
Most embedded systems can have new features implemented. By doing a firmware upgrade to the hardware an a software upgrade to the entire system.

The only time a hardware upgrade is usually needed is when its processing power is too slow to be able to handle the new features.

An auto restart feature should be a software upgrade.
     
     
  #12707  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2014, 10:36 PM
officedweller officedweller is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,799
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kisai View Post

Of interest, CBTC only became standardized in like 1999, revised in 2004
http://standards.ieee.org/findstds/standard/1474.1-2004.html
Contracts were probably signed before that for construction of the Millennium Line (which opened in 2002).

Note that Thales' predecessor was Alcatel.
     
     
  #12708  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2014, 1:45 AM
tybuilding tybuilding is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 898
TransLink announces it will adopt all 20 recommendations after transit expert’s SkyTrain review

TransLink has announced it will adopt all 20 recommendations made by an independent transportation expert after two failures in SkyTrain service left thousands of commuters stranded on the elevated platforms this past summer.


The changes, which will include the installation of emergency power "redundancies," are expected to cost the regional transportation company $71 million.

However, $30 million of that will be spent on improving communication with riders when the system is experiencing any problems and suggest alternate routes.
     
     
  #12709  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2014, 3:27 AM
MIPS's Avatar
MIPS MIPS is offline
SkyTrain Nut
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Kamloops
Posts: 2,117
I predict that we'll see $3 single zone fares in the next five years thanks to all this.
     
     
  #12710  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2014, 4:25 AM
dpogue dpogue is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 769
Quote:
Originally Posted by allan_kuan View Post
Anyone have a quick photo of what it looks like?
On the bus stop at VCC-Clark station (taken by me, this morning):
     
     
  #12711  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2014, 5:18 AM
officedweller officedweller is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,799
Shouldn't that sign say "emergency" or something to indicate that it's not a regularly scheduled service (i.e. like WCE Train Bus?)
     
     
  #12712  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2014, 7:05 AM
Meraki Meraki is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 473
I don't believe "Bus Bridge" is used in any normal service.

I also don't expect most of the general public to seek out this sign when there are SkyTrain problems. Perhaps with a giant LED sign saying "NO SKYTRAIN, TAKE BUS HERE" that lights up along with closed station gates... That would probably cover 50% of passengers.

People don't look at signs, they don't pay attention to alerts. The best way of managing these incidents is having STA's on scene informing and controlling the crowds. I support the recent report's recommendations of placing STAs in hi-vis vests and having megaphones. Most passengers are going to stand there and be angry,curse you to the deepest pits of hell, but at least you can help the ones who are willing to listen to alternative arrangements.

Last edited by Meraki; Nov 20, 2014 at 7:18 AM.
     
     
  #12713  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2014, 10:19 AM
Kisai Kisai is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 1,154
Quote:
Originally Posted by Meraki View Post
I don't believe "Bus Bridge" is used in any normal service.

I also don't expect most of the general public to seek out this sign when there are SkyTrain problems. Perhaps with a giant LED sign saying "NO SKYTRAIN, TAKE BUS HERE" that lights up along with closed station gates... That would probably cover 50% of passengers.

People don't look at signs, they don't pay attention to alerts. The best way of managing these incidents is having STA's on scene informing and controlling the crowds. I support the recent report's recommendations of placing STAs in hi-vis vests and having megaphones. Most passengers are going to stand there and be angry,curse you to the deepest pits of hell, but at least you can help the ones who are willing to listen to alternative arrangements.
The most telling problem with communication on transit is that there is no way to tell important information from transient information.

Like those LCD screens on the platforms SHOULD have that info, but they don't. The LED arrays are always saying something about elevators or escalators are out of service somewhere. How much effort would it take to have those video screens interrupted every time the PA's announce something to display the same message as text for 2 minutes?
     
     
  #12714  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2014, 1:50 PM
Bcasey25raptor's Avatar
Bcasey25raptor Bcasey25raptor is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Vancouver Suburbs
Posts: 2,890
Quote:
Originally Posted by dpogue View Post
On the bus stop at VCC-Clark station (taken by me, this morning):
I saw this at the main-science world station area and I was curious what it meant.
     
     
  #12715  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2014, 3:24 PM
dpogue dpogue is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 769
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kisai View Post
The most telling problem with communication on transit is that there is no way to tell important information from transient information.

Like those LCD screens on the platforms SHOULD have that info, but they don't. The LED arrays are always saying something about elevators or escalators are out of service somewhere. How much effort would it take to have those video screens interrupted every time the PA's announce something to display the same message as text for 2 minutes?
The video screens are not managed by SkyTrain, so they have no control over the content being displayed. That's entirely up to TransLink and Lamar advertising.

SkyTrain control should be able to push a message out to the LED platform boards, but that's probably lower priority than coordinating staff over the radio and phoning CMBC to set up a bus bridge.
     
     
  #12716  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2014, 7:08 PM
Gordon Gordon is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,065
Translink should be able pump out what ever info it needs in the case of emergency. The platform LED boards need to be updated the elevated station platform boards are only visible within 8 - 10 feet away if it is bright out side.
     
     
  #12717  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2014, 7:32 PM
cabotp cabotp is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 2,813
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kisai View Post
The most telling problem with communication on transit is that there is no way to tell important information from transient information.

Like those LCD screens on the platforms SHOULD have that info, but they don't. The LED arrays are always saying something about elevators or escalators are out of service somewhere. How much effort would it take to have those video screens interrupted every time the PA's announce something to display the same message as text for 2 minutes?
That was one of the problems that was mentioned in the report. Basically people ignore "canned" messages.

The person speaking on the PA must make it sound like it is life and death what they are saying. And not just some everyday message.
     
     
  #12718  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2014, 7:35 PM
Vancity's Avatar
Vancity Vancity is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Richmond, BC
Posts: 1,637
Quote:
Originally Posted by GlassCity View Post
I would give anything for Bridgeport Station to have a little convenience store similar to Scott Road's. I've spent too many hungry nights waiting for the bus there!
they should actually have something like that in all the stations. i think asia's got it right usually with their idea of public transportation with smaller shops setting up shop in their stations (jugo juice does it in some of the canada line stations) - but could we get some more in there?

don't understand why they wouldn't do it.

i almost always refer to HK's MTR, because it is one of the world's best. vancouver's public transportation has a lot to be desired (as of right now). there could be so much more done for our public transportation (mainly skytrain) to be much better.
     
     
  #12719  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2014, 7:53 PM
GlassCity's Avatar
GlassCity GlassCity is offline
Rational urbanist
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Metro Vancouver
Posts: 5,270
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vancity View Post
they should actually have something like that in all the stations. i think asia's got it right usually with their idea of public transportation with smaller shops setting up shop in their stations (jugo juice does it in some of the canada line stations) - but could we get some more in there?

don't understand why they wouldn't do it.

i almost always refer to HK's MTR, because it is one of the world's best. vancouver's public transportation has a lot to be desired (as of right now). there could be so much more done for our public transportation (mainly skytrain) to be much better.
I'm pretty sure just about every Jugo Juice has failed, because I never see them open. Something people here have brought up recently is you need washrooms for employees to have little shops at stations so if the plumbing's not already worked in it would be really hard to put it in now. It's something that needs to be considered during construction, not after.
     
     
  #12720  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2014, 8:28 PM
officedweller officedweller is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,799
I don't think that people will hang out at a station - it's really only if they are trapped there and need to buy something.

WRT convenience, it probably depends on the product. If there are Starbucks closer to my office, I will buy it there (on the way to work), instead of walking several blocks with a hot cup in my hand, while holding a briefcase and umbrella. People are less likely to buy a drink on the way home.

Even under The Bay, on the SkyTrain concourse - one of the busiest transit passages in Vancouver, the previous food concessions did not do well. I don't know how the current concession is doing.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:04 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.