Quote:
Originally Posted by TakeFive
Well stated. Although not within walking distance there well be plenty of nearby additional rooms.
Gaylord does seem to have their own sphere of influence. I can easily envision some planners and others wanting to hop the commuter train to check out downtown Denver. There may be professional planners along that work with many different groups. Nothing like taking advantage of of the opportunity to check out the facilities downtown in person.
Denver has very little in the way of larger, nicer resort hotels with conference facilities. Down here they thrive on those. While many are concentrated along Scottsdale Road the newer 1400 room JW Marriott Phoenix Desert Ridge Resort & Spa is around the bend near the 101. Then there's The Boulders a tucked away Waldorf Astoria hotel.
Point being... I can't think of much in Denver other than the Inverness Hotel and Conference Center. There's some modest offerings in the Tech Center. Eventually as the metro area continues to grow the odds increase for more competition. I wouldn't be surprised if Douglas County floats some ideas for convention facilities.
I've always viewed Gaylord as the least threatening and even having synergies with downtown and potential future business. I have no idea when the court proceedings will be resolved.
|
I do think there are a couple options for hotel/conference centers around the metro area, the Omni Interlocken, Inverness as you stated, Marriott DTC, the Westin at the Westminster Promenade, the soon to be Westin at DIA, soon to be Hyatt at Anschutz, and the Hyatt downtown, but really the options are pretty limited around a metro our size. The mountains do open up that opportunity quite a bit though, there are a fairly large number of conference centers up in Summit and Eagle counties, and COS has the Broadmoor.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fritzdude
I've often wondered why some hotel doesn't build a "superstructure" right above the convention center..
It's a big flat rooftop up there. It would obviously need to be massed to support a "pop top", which it isn't, but it would certainly be efficient for convention goers who want to be close.
|
I've always thought the same, or especially over the parking garage. I'm sure none of the structure was originally designed for vertical expansion so it would be quite an undertaking, but the airspace over the convention center is very underutilized. You would think at the very least they would have covered the roof in solar panels as its in a pretty prime position for them.