Quote:
Originally Posted by TakeFive
🞵🞵🞵 laws.
Although Republicans would be in the enviable position of being able to float a tax cut "just for show" if they assume that Hickenlooper would veto it. Assuming Hick would be willing to compromise on 🞵🞵🞵 laws, the question is whether Republicans would even care or if they just want to keep the issue for the next campaign?
Given Hickenlooper's Budget Proposal that bumps up both higher ed and road & transit spending by over a $100 million with more modest increases for eco-devo that sounds like a bi-partisan approach to me.
|
Who says that the GOP wants to be bipartisan at the state level? A good number of the new State Assembly members aren't exactly moderates and I can see a lot of the looney tune ideas of the fringe, such as seizing all federal lands in Colorado, being introduced in the legislature on a regular basis.
We'll see just how well the GOP leadership can ride herd on the loonies. 🞵🞵🞵🞵 will be a clusterf**, as will state's rights issues. Oh, and let's not forget some good 'ol fashion union busting. Hopefully the fiscal issues don't end up going that way as well (the state doesn't know how to spend money on transportation, let's give a tax cut to the people and let them build the roads through entrepreneurship!)
Best case would be for a divided assembly.