Quote:
Originally Posted by MIPS
I think the idea of boxy steel and concrete slabs is a thing of the past here. Glass and thin metal structures look "modern" (and it's much cheaper to build) I guess but it's really tacky in a lot of applications.
I'm also still in the dark on why they moved the lobby entrance from the middle of the building to the corner. What happened there besides reorganizing a few ground level suites?
|
I don't think it's necessarily "tacky" -
I think it's because there's a disconnect between the "weight" or "solidness" of the materials in the "old" and the "new".
In order to stand next to a big concrete column, I think you'd either need to be deferential (invisible) - like at the MacBlo Building, or you need a massive steel I-beam or canopy that looks really solid to hold its own - like the canopy at Scotia Plaza in Toronto.
What we see at 200 Granville are standard sized prongs for the awning and aluminum cladding (i.e. a veneer) that you'd see on a 2 storey retail store. It isn't proportional for a 25 storey tower.
Another example of poorly proportioned awnings are along Georgia St. at the Library Square office tower.
I also find it odd that they moved the lobby to the prime window wall with a harbour view. You'd think that would make prime retail lease space for a restaurant spilling onto the plaza.