HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Downtown & Urban Ottawa


    The Met in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Ottawa Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #21  
Old Posted Nov 2, 2014, 2:22 PM
OTSkyline OTSkyline is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,825
I guess they are trying to move fast on this one, there is already a big "Notice of Development Application" with info and render posted at the site from City of Ottawa.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22  
Old Posted Nov 2, 2014, 6:44 PM
McC's Avatar
McC McC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,057
There's nothing unusual about the sign going up at the same time as application docs going up online.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #23  
Old Posted Nov 2, 2014, 6:53 PM
Beedok Beedok is offline
Exiled Hamiltonian Gal
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,796
Signs can stay up for years. There's one lot near the grocery store I go to that's had one up for probably 2 or 3 years.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #24  
Old Posted Nov 2, 2014, 9:25 PM
JHikka's Avatar
JHikka JHikka is offline
ハルウララ
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 12,853
Love the location, hate the impending wall of 27 floor buildings.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #25  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2014, 4:56 PM
Boxster's Avatar
Boxster Boxster is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 996
The best views from this building on a scale of 1 to 10 is 2....just want to be polite.
__________________
The Fast One!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #26  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2014, 8:12 PM
Arcologist Arcologist is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: The Nation's Capital
Posts: 696
Sure, why not?!? The building is as ugly as the Tribeca buildings across the street.

If you ask me, the Tribeca buildings were a missed opportunity to break-up the overwhelming Place Bell mass with some slightly taller buildings. Building them slightly shorter only makes Place Bell seem even more hulking.

I'd consider making this building taller, at maybe 34 storeys, but with the last 7-8 storeys much more slender than the lower floors. A tapered peak would be a nice change!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #27  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2014, 9:24 PM
kevinbottawa kevinbottawa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,260
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arcologist View Post
Sure, why not?!? The building is as ugly as the Tribeca buildings across the street.

If you ask me, the Tribeca buildings were a missed opportunity to break-up the overwhelming Place Bell mass with some slightly taller buildings. Building them slightly shorter only makes Place Bell seem even more hulking.

I'd consider making this building taller, at maybe 34 storeys, but with the last 7-8 storeys much more slender than the lower floors. A tapered peak would be a nice change!
Doesn't the CDP cap buildings at 27 storeys?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #28  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2014, 10:42 PM
Urbanarchit Urbanarchit is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 1,927
*

Last edited by Urbanarchit; Aug 27, 2015 at 5:21 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #29  
Old Posted Nov 4, 2014, 11:44 AM
McC's Avatar
McC McC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,057
A couple of things to remember: Tribeca was before the CDP; and the Centretown CDP didn't change the zoning, so that there could still be s37 benefits from up zoning the sites designated for highrises in the CDP.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #30  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2014, 6:28 PM
Arcologist Arcologist is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: The Nation's Capital
Posts: 696
Quote:
Originally Posted by defishel View Post
Typically the CDP does cap at 27 stories, but I think this site is zoned for much shorter (37 meters according to the article). Reading back about Tribeca, it was zoned for something like 12 or 15 floors, and it was such a struggle to get 27-stories.
Not sure what the regulations are, but something needs to be done about the wall of 27-storey buildings and the completely dead skyline. (Come to think of it, not just in the downtown CBD, but also the Market!)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #31  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2014, 10:39 PM
Urbanarchit Urbanarchit is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 1,927
*

Last edited by Urbanarchit; Aug 27, 2015 at 5:21 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #32  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2014, 11:09 PM
1overcosc's Avatar
1overcosc 1overcosc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 12,377
^ I think it's the global height limit imposed on large swaths of the core area due to Parliamentary viewplanes.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #33  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2014, 10:54 PM
Harley613's Avatar
Harley613 Harley613 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Aylmer, QC
Posts: 6,894
So who the hell is 'Toth Equity' anyhow? Google shows they are an Ottawa company but I can't even find a website...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2014, 3:32 AM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,646
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harley613 View Post
So who the hell is 'Toth Equity' anyhow? Google shows they are an Ottawa company but I can't even find a website...
The Toth family were the owners of Burkholder Furs and Dworkin Furs in Ottawa. They developed the former Burkholder site at 119 Bank St at Slater St into the Telus Bldg, and they sold the old Dworkin site at 256 Rideau St. site to Phoenix Homes.

http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news...?id=47209aee-a797-4f56-b663-94756cf5bf30
http://www.obj.ca/Other/Archives/2002-09...Furs-shutting-doors-for-good-this-week/1

Toth Equity (a commercial real estate holding company) also own the Towngate Shopping Centre at 2446-2470 Bank St.

http://www.canlii.org/en/on/onca/doc/2011/2011onca372/2011onca372.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #35  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2014, 4:36 AM
drawarc's Avatar
drawarc drawarc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 471
Re: 180 Metcalfe, here's an old pic from Lost Ottawa, showing Medical Arts Building.



Source:https://www.facebook.com/LostOttawa/phot...5592534./823364227762803/?type=3&theater
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #36  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2014, 3:32 PM
ServiceGuy ServiceGuy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 335
Fabulous photo find. It seems odd to see all the cars facing the "wrong direction" given current day design.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #37  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2014, 3:39 PM
acottawa acottawa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 18,867
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1overcosc View Post
^ I think it's the global height limit imposed on large swaths of the core area due to Parliamentary viewplanes.
I think the view plane limits are variable (depend on things like elevation of the site). I suspect it either has something to do with the OMB (which is based on precedent, so if somebody gets a 27 floor building approved all the other developers know they will win cases for 27 floors) or building code (over 27 floors requires more elevators or something like that).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #38  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2015, 9:50 PM
black cat black cat is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 17
This looks like a very good proposal, and very respectful of integrating the Medical Arts Building, and the tower is set back and reasonably similar to others in the immediate vicinity. Its a pity Ottawa does not have more projects of this ilk and which keep the heritage building fabric rather than permitting the heritage property to be dismantled and replaced by a contemporary facade as is permitted along Rideau Street.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #39  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2015, 10:23 PM
Urbanarchit Urbanarchit is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 1,927
*

Last edited by Urbanarchit; Aug 27, 2015 at 5:21 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #40  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2015, 5:02 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,646
Metcalfe Medical Arts building recommended for heritage status

Matthew Pearson, Ottawa Citizen
Published on: June 11, 2015, Last Updated: June 11, 2015 12:25 PM EDT




The built-heritage subcommittee has granted a heritage designation to an Art Deco-style building in Centretown slated for redevelopment as part of a new 27-storey tower.

The Medical Arts building at 180 Metcalfe St. is a six-storey brick office building built in 1928. It was designed by Ottawa architect W.E. Noffke, the same man responsible for the Champagne Bath and Central Post Office buildings.

Heritage planners say the building’s symmetrical facade, copper panels and geometric patterned brick panels help make it a rare example of the Art Deco style popularized in the 1920s and 1930s.

The property’s current owner, John Toth, has applied for a zoning bylaw amendment to permit a 27-storey mixed-use building that will incorporate approximately 80 per cent of the existing building.

He told the committee Thursday that he did not object to the heritage designation, which would only apply to the building’s exterior.

The planning committee is set to consider both the heritage designation and the zoning bylaw amendment at its next meeting.

[email protected]
twitter.com/mpearson78

http://ottawacitizen.com/news/local-news...building-recommended-for-heritage-status
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Downtown & Urban Ottawa
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:40 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.