Quote:
Originally Posted by Ziobrop
I tend to agree, consciously or not, every story is slanted by the reporters view. Bousquet is at least consistent with his bias - and doesn't try to hide it. unlike many other local Jurno's, he takes the time to understand the issues, get his facts straight, and clearly communicate the ideas to people in an understandable manner. Halifax is very lucky to have him.
i disagree with 90% of his views. but its clear what is his view, and what is fact.
|
Yeah I would have to disagree with the last sentence too. He may present the facts, but only that facts that support his case. He is not good at acknowledging the other side and when he does, on occasion, he dismisses it without any consideration.
I'm not offended by his bias - we're all biased - but I am offended that he calls himself an "investigative journalist" - with a lot of puffed-up hero-complex hubris, I might add - when he only investigates one side of any story. Investigation includes seeking out and considering all available information, and Bousquet only (and obsessively) pursues one side only.
He is a pretty decent essayist, but he is no seeker of truth.
I also find his snotty writing style very childish, and much of his half-baked philosophy just sounds like a second year university student working through her massive daddy issues.