Quote:
Originally Posted by WhipperSnapper
I disagree. Poor planning and funding of car focused ideals has made decentralization less successful but, a city like Toronto would collapse under its own weight without it.
|
Even in the glory days of the 1950s

downtowns were not the only employment area.
You are right about the poor planning. Toronto had pretty good planning, where most office development until the 1990's that was not built downtown, was at least built on the subway network.
However even on rapid transit, non-downtown offices still have much higher car usage rates.
Canadian downtowns are not as dominant as they could be, and I do not think Canadian cities are in any situation where decentralization is required to handle crowding issues

. If anything, we need more life back downtown in terms of employment.
One can also look to places like London, where they are building Crossrail, and they are not shy to say it is to connect people to central London, and allow people to get to the city centre faster to work and enjoy all the city centre has to offer. When I was in London, they had signs up promoting how you be within 45 minutes of all Central London has to offer once Crossrail opens. The scheme is also part of a plan to continue to support extensive growth of employment in Central London.
But as I said. Canadian downtowns are not crowded and the transit is not crowded. And where there is crowding, it is because our transit has not kept up with development. It is not because we have too much development downtown.
Take Calgary for example. The trains may be full. But they are also only operating every 4-6 minutes at rush hour. Toronto's trains are full. But it is not because of downtown. It is because we have not expanded capacity in decades.
Just for reference and to show how Canadian cities really do not have an overdevelopment problem in our downtowns. I am reading a book on transit planning, and one of the stats is how over 60% of metropolitan jobs in Munich, Germany are in the city centre.