HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #4741  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2014, 5:25 PM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,204
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beedok View Post
I want both in the end too, I just thought that Hamilton to Toronto would be the first intercity electric line.
I believe the environmental assessment has been completed on the Kitchener line at least to the Airport, that's why I'll have to assume it will be electrified before the Lakeshore line. I don't know how far along the EA has been completed with regards to the Hamilton/Oshawa line.
     
     
  #4742  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2014, 5:51 PM
LeftCoaster's Avatar
LeftCoaster LeftCoaster is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toroncouver
Posts: 13,141
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhipperSnapper View Post
Winter Olympics aren't the Olympics either.
Haha tell that to Putin's accountants!

Quote:
Originally Posted by J.OT13 View Post
The issue isn't just about aesthetics. They should have built HSR between Union and Pearson right off the bat, regardless of the Pan AM games.
HSR Pearson to Union? It wouldn't even reach full speed before it would have to start breaking... how in the world would that make sense?
     
     
  #4743  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2014, 6:13 PM
Trans Canada's Avatar
Trans Canada Trans Canada is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 841
I honestly like the colour scheme and design in general. A bit of a retro feel with the colours and and the overall shape looks very industrial functional. Looks like this train means business.


Credit: David Vincent, http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=16044


Credit: Alexander Glista, http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=16063
     
     
  #4744  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2014, 11:04 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 28,916
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeftCoaster View Post
HSR Pearson to Union? It wouldn't even reach full speed before it would have to start breaking... how in the world would that make sense?
So trains running 200 km/h+ can't reach top speed on 23.3 km of track?

Anyway, I guess I'll stop arguing. I imagine that the distance might not warrant HSR like Montreal to Mirabel would have, had they kept it as MTL's main airport.
     
     
  #4745  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2014, 11:10 PM
GreatTallNorth2 GreatTallNorth2 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,758
London, Kitchener and Waterloo Municipal Leaders Meet With Transportation Officials Over Commuter Rail

It is being billed as a reinforcement of the province’s commitment of commuter rail for London, Kitchener and Waterloo.

Representatives from all three centres met with Steven Del Duca, the Ontario Minister of Transportation, at the Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO)’s annual general meeting in London, to discuss a number of topics around the need for commuter rail for the three cities.

One of those was the foundation of the High Speed Rail corridor, which was announced back in April, that would run between London and Toronto with stops in Kitchener-Waterloo and at Pearson International Airport. In all, it would take a train 71 minutes to get from downtown London to downtown Toronto at a speed of about 320km/hr.

The plan has an estimated net cost of about $500 million, as apart of Premier Kathleen Wynne’s $29 billion dollar transportation masterplan.

Mayor Joni Baechler represented London in the discussion.

“We are pleased that the province has committed to explore high speed rail. This would be a game-changer in London and significantly boost our economy,” Mayor Baechler said in a release on Monday, “Our communities look forward to working with the province as these plans are developed.”

Along with the High Speed Rail line, the group discussed the provincial commitment to the two-way GO train service between Kitchener and Toronto – which is being billed as a precursor to the high speed rail line.

That project was saved when the Ontario Liberals won the provincial election in June.
     
     
  #4746  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2014, 11:40 PM
LeftCoaster's Avatar
LeftCoaster LeftCoaster is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toroncouver
Posts: 13,141
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.OT13 View Post
So trains running 200 km/h+ can't reach top speed on 23.3 km of track?
To be honest this isn't an area I have a ton of knowledge, but you don't see too many spurs of that length.

My guess would be for the following reason:
  1. Would not spend much time, if any, at top speed, due to time to accelorate and break.
  2. Limited return on extra expense over standard rail due to short time at top speed
     
     
  #4747  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2014, 11:41 PM
LeftCoaster's Avatar
LeftCoaster LeftCoaster is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toroncouver
Posts: 13,141
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.OT13 View Post
So trains running 200 km/h+ can't reach top speed on 23.3 km of track?
To be honest this isn't an area I have a ton of knowledge, but you don't see too many spurs of that length.

My guess would be for the following reason:
  1. Would not spend much time, if any, at top speed, due to time needed to accelerate and break.
  2. Limited return on extra expense over standard rail due to short time at top speed
  3. High operating costs due to frequent acceleration and limited time spent at efficient "cruising speed"
     
     
  #4748  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2014, 12:47 AM
Innsertnamehere's Avatar
Innsertnamehere Innsertnamehere is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 12,865
especially given that it has to stop at Bloor to pick up roughly 25% of its passengers. as it is today most of the stretch will be a 160km/h zone anyway.

Going above 160km/h requires a special signalling system as well from my understanding, and cannot mix with freight trains.
     
     
  #4749  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2014, 1:25 AM
ehlow ehlow is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Toronto
Posts: 42
Trains will be going much faster on the Georgetown corridor due to corridor upgrades, but I would think the fastest parts of HSR to London, would be between Pearson & Kitchener and Kitchener to London, not Pearson to Toronto.
     
     
  #4750  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2014, 1:57 AM
Innsertnamehere's Avatar
Innsertnamehere Innsertnamehere is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 12,865
Fastest portion will probably be between London and Kitchener as it is supposed to be a new alignment which is very, very straight. The slowest part will be Brampton-Downtown which will be limited to 160km/h to conform to the speeds of the existing Georgetown South upgrades. Even then it will probably only take just over 20 minutes to clear the entirety of the GTA, the express GO trains from Bramalea are expected to make sub-20 minute travel times to downtown. During the peak of Georgetown construction that same trip took over 45 minutes, and takes 31 minutes today. Electrification would reduce those times even more.

Its possible to make the Kitchener GO train trips ~1:40 long starting next year if you make the express trips on the Kitchener lines the ones that do the full trip out to Kitchener, without a single upgrade to the tracks west of Brampton. Getting the trip down to an hour is probably realistic if the entire line got upgraded to 160km/h standards.
     
     
  #4751  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2014, 2:00 AM
Allan83 Allan83 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,410
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreatTallNorth2 View Post
London, Kitchener and Waterloo Municipal Leaders Meet With Transportation Officials Over Commuter Rail

It is being billed as a reinforcement of the province’s commitment of commuter rail for London, Kitchener and Waterloo.

Representatives from all three centres met with Steven Del Duca, the Ontario Minister of Transportation, at the Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO)’s annual general meeting in London, to discuss a number of topics around the need for commuter rail for the three cities.

One of those was the foundation of the High Speed Rail corridor, which was announced back in April, that would run between London and Toronto with stops in Kitchener-Waterloo and at Pearson International Airport. In all, it would take a train 71 minutes to get from downtown London to downtown Toronto at a speed of about 320km/hr.

The plan has an estimated net cost of about $500 million, as apart of Premier Kathleen Wynne’s $29 billion dollar transportation masterplan.

Mayor Joni Baechler represented London in the discussion.

“We are pleased that the province has committed to explore high speed rail. This would be a game-changer in London and significantly boost our economy,” Mayor Baechler said in a release on Monday, “Our communities look forward to working with the province as these plans are developed.”

Along with the High Speed Rail line, the group discussed the provincial commitment to the two-way GO train service between Kitchener and Toronto – which is being billed as a precursor to the high speed rail line.

That project was saved when the Ontario Liberals won the provincial election in June.
If I’ve read the map right that’s about 200 kms of track for $500 million?? A recent estimate for a 300 km long 320 km/h line between Edmonton and Calgary put it at a little over $5 billion. What’s different about this line?
     
     
  #4752  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2014, 2:14 AM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,204
$500 million is the net cost of "the plan". I'd have to assume that includes design, engineering as well as the environmental assessment. Not likely the cost to construct and hardware.

My photos from just now

Second Platform - Union Station



     
     
  #4753  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2014, 2:14 AM
Beedok Beedok is offline
Exiled Hamiltonian Gal
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,795
Quote:
Originally Posted by Allan83 View Post
If I’ve read the map right that’s about 200 kms of track for $500 million?? A recent estimate for a 300 km long 320 km/h line between Edmonton and Calgary put it at a little over $5 billion. What’s different about this line?
Ontario already owns a good chunk of the rail corridor, so that's less land to be purchase? The winters are also a bit more mild temperature wise? Possibly the existing train stations are considered sufficient for demand with the HSR project? Lower labour costs due to cheaper living expenses? Optimistic price accounts to make it more appealing to the public?
     
     
  #4754  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2014, 2:15 AM
Innsertnamehere's Avatar
Innsertnamehere Innsertnamehere is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 12,865
^its expected to be a P-3 with $2-$3 billion in costs recovered in fares, (profits) from my understanding. Its around 150km of 300km/h rail as well, the remaining urban portion through Toronto is already being upgraded (completion early next year), to 160km/h standards.
     
     
  #4755  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2014, 2:17 AM
kwoldtimer kwoldtimer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: La vraie capitale
Posts: 26,218
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreatTallNorth2 View Post
London, Kitchener and Waterloo Municipal Leaders Meet With Transportation Officials Over Commuter Rail

It is being billed as a reinforcement of the province’s commitment of commuter rail for London, Kitchener and Waterloo.

Representatives from all three centres met with Steven Del Duca, the Ontario Minister of Transportation, at the Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO)’s annual general meeting in London, to discuss a number of topics around the need for commuter rail for the three cities.

One of those was the foundation of the High Speed Rail corridor, which was announced back in April, that would run between London and Toronto with stops in Kitchener-Waterloo and at Pearson International Airport. In all, it would take a train 71 minutes to get from downtown London to downtown Toronto at a speed of about 320km/hr.

The plan has an estimated net cost of about $500 million, as apart of Premier Kathleen Wynne’s $29 billion dollar transportation masterplan.

Mayor Joni Baechler represented London in the discussion.

“We are pleased that the province has committed to explore high speed rail. This would be a game-changer in London and significantly boost our economy,” Mayor Baechler said in a release on Monday, “Our communities look forward to working with the province as these plans are developed.”

Along with the High Speed Rail line, the group discussed the provincial commitment to the two-way GO train service between Kitchener and Toronto – which is being billed as a precursor to the high speed rail line.

That project was saved when the Ontario Liberals won the provincial election in June.
The Record reports no firm timetable yet for all-day two-way Go trains, but:

"In this year's budget, the government revealed it purchased a rail line linking Kitchener to Guelph and Georgetown, signalling its intent to create a traffic-free rail link to and from the region, and encouraging the area's mayors.

(Kitchener Mayor) Zehr said he and (Transportation Minister) Del Duca discussed another yet to be announced development of similar importance to the purchase of the rail line, which will be made public soon
."

http://www.therecord.com/news-story/4765228-no-timetable-but-go-hopes-high/
     
     
  #4756  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2014, 2:19 AM
Innsertnamehere's Avatar
Innsertnamehere Innsertnamehere is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 12,865
I'm sure the Metrolinx office is going crazy right now ramping up for all these new rail projects, they have a very, very big project on their hands and the money is likely already flowing for it.

The next big update is supposed to come in September at the Metrolinx Board meeting.
     
     
  #4757  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2014, 2:55 AM
ssiguy ssiguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: White Rock BC
Posts: 11,960
I wonder what will happen to London VIA service if this HSR ever gets built?

If this line is "premium" like the UPX with very high prices, Londoner may balk if it's going to cost them a lot more than the standard VIA service. VIA and Queen's Park are going to have to work out some form of arrangement because London is VIA's 4th busiest rail station in the country. Londoners are going to get REALLY pissed if all of a sudden VIA cuts service dramatically due to the HSR but the fares double overnight due to being a faster service.

If VIA cuts service between London and Toronto, then what about other people along the line such as Woodstock and Brantford to say nothing of people who want to get to Hamilton/Halton/Niagara?

What about Windsor & Sarnia service? London is a major market by itself but much still comes from other SW areas and Detroit and US destinations. Will this service continue on from Windsor to Toronto via Hamilton as it is right now or via HSR to Kit/Tor and same goes for Sarnia trains? If they have to take VIA to London and then transfer onto HSR will they pay twice? Will their VIA Corridor pass still be valid? Are they going to run on the exact same schedule for both Sarnia and Windsor trains? If not then does that mean they will have to wait to transfer onto HSR for a couple hours at London...............makes the whole notion of high speed rail rather absurd.

Is this line going to be subsidized as much as regular GO commuter buses? For those areas that will now have dramatically reduced VIA rail service between London and Hamilton be getting GO commuter bus service as a replacement? A cut in VIA service will save the feds money but is that money going to be redirected to this service? If not then Ontario has increased it's transit subsidy bill significantly and saved the feds a fortune.........hardly seems fair.

This may have made for great speeches at election time but the logistics are going to be just as difficult as the construction. There is also politics at play having to appease the people along VIA who will get their service cut or people from Win/Sar who now have to transfer at London.

It was also mentioned earlier about potentially just running the line to Kitchener and if the government ever did that then you would have a full scale riot on your hands from every member in the SouthWest regardless of political stripe. Londoners especially would be outraged that their city would get shafted made much worse by the fact that KW & Ham are both getting funding for LRT and yet London which has higher total ridership and much higher per-capita ridership than either one hasn't been offered a cent for it's BRT.
     
     
  #4758  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2014, 6:32 AM
Allan83 Allan83 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,410
Quote:
Originally Posted by Innsertnamehere View Post
^its expected to be a P-3 with $2-$3 billion in costs recovered in fares, (profits) from my understanding. Its around 150km of 300km/h rail as well, the remaining urban portion through Toronto is already being upgraded (completion early next year), to 160km/h standards.
Ah, that makes more sense then. It’ll be interesting to see the revenue projections. I think they’ll be different from the Calgary to Edmonton line in that I expect there will be quite a few commuters on this line. This has to be an expensive way to commute, however.
     
     
  #4759  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2014, 12:13 PM
1overcosc's Avatar
1overcosc 1overcosc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 12,377
Quote:
Originally Posted by ssiguy View Post
I wonder what will happen to London VIA service if this HSR ever gets built?

If this line is "premium" like the UPX with very high prices, Londoner may balk if it's going to cost them a lot more than the standard VIA service. VIA and Queen's Park are going to have to work out some form of arrangement because London is VIA's 4th busiest rail station in the country. Londoners are going to get REALLY pissed if all of a sudden VIA cuts service dramatically due to the HSR but the fares double overnight due to being a faster service.

If VIA cuts service between London and Toronto, then what about other people along the line such as Woodstock and Brantford to say nothing of people who want to get to Hamilton/Halton/Niagara?

What about Windsor & Sarnia service? London is a major market by itself but much still comes from other SW areas and Detroit and US destinations. Will this service continue on from Windsor to Toronto via Hamilton as it is right now or via HSR to Kit/Tor and same goes for Sarnia trains? If they have to take VIA to London and then transfer onto HSR will they pay twice? Will their VIA Corridor pass still be valid? Are they going to run on the exact same schedule for both Sarnia and Windsor trains? If not then does that mean they will have to wait to transfer onto HSR for a couple hours at London...............makes the whole notion of high speed rail rather absurd.

Is this line going to be subsidized as much as regular GO commuter buses? For those areas that will now have dramatically reduced VIA rail service between London and Hamilton be getting GO commuter bus service as a replacement? A cut in VIA service will save the feds money but is that money going to be redirected to this service? If not then Ontario has increased it's transit subsidy bill significantly and saved the feds a fortune.........hardly seems fair.

This may have made for great speeches at election time but the logistics are going to be just as difficult as the construction. There is also politics at play having to appease the people along VIA who will get their service cut or people from Win/Sar who now have to transfer at London.

It was also mentioned earlier about potentially just running the line to Kitchener and if the government ever did that then you would have a full scale riot on your hands from every member in the SouthWest regardless of political stripe. Londoners especially would be outraged that their city would get shafted made much worse by the fact that KW & Ham are both getting funding for LRT and yet London which has higher total ridership and much higher per-capita ridership than either one hasn't been offered a cent for it's BRT.
innsertname will have to make a full response to this (he's the expert at GTA transit issues) but I'll stab at the price. The government stated an average fare of $40, so comparable to current VIA pricing.

As for why this line is only $500M, two reasons:
1) The line will make a profit, so a P3 partner will be able to pay about $2B of their own money for it in exchange for capturing profits for 20-30 years
2) The project is piggy-backing on other projects that do most of the heavy lifting for it. Grade separation and electrification will be done on half the line anyway as part of the GO RER plan.

Nowhere else in Canada is such a cheap & easy HSR possible. A Toronto-Ottawa line wouldn't work like this, because while it could probably raise $3B from P3 financing, its construction cost would be way higher. It would require a new greenfield ROW for almost its entire route making it cost something like $10B or so. So it would have a net cost of about $7B, 14 times higher than the KW-London line.

Last edited by 1overcosc; Aug 19, 2014 at 12:24 PM.
     
     
  #4760  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2014, 1:12 PM
Innsertnamehere's Avatar
Innsertnamehere Innsertnamehere is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 12,865
Not half the line, the GO RER will use the existing alignment east of kitchener but the HSR needs a new alignment bypassing Guelph.

Most of the urban upgrading work through Toronto will be done already though, yes (Similar to the California HSR through San Fransisco).

Sarnia isn't a big city, and doesn't have all that much of a rail market. Honestly I'm amazed.Sarnia service hasn't been cut already.

Windsor is included in the EA apparently, but will be constructed at a later date.

Detroit does not have rail service that connects to Canada.

Niagara/Hamilton is supposed to be served by GO RER, VIA service is already nonexistent on that corridor anyway other than the AMTRAK Maple Leaf service to New York.

Otherwise.most of your questions are still unknowns, such as what will happen to via service through Woodstock and Brantford. That sort of thing will come through the EA.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:47 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.