HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Transportation


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1421  
Old Posted Aug 13, 2014, 1:05 PM
Innsertnamehere's Avatar
Innsertnamehere Innsertnamehere is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 12,875
Ottawas lrt will fairly easily get funding, the outside of GTA fund if anything needs more projects, its the inside GTA fund that has way more projects than money.
     
     
  #1422  
Old Posted Aug 13, 2014, 2:19 PM
S-Man S-Man is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,639
Quote:
The key to that HSR project is that it connects the tech. hub of Kitchener-Waterloo to the global gateway that is the GTA- making it much more attractive for Ontario to court Google/FB to build campuses in Waterloo if it's only 60 mins from Pearson.

Developing that tech. hub is very important to the success of the Ontario econ. going forward.

More or less.
Will those be another one of those high-tech companies Wynne is subsidizing to the tune of hundreds of thousands of dollars per employee?

Hope the company sticks around for 30 years and their employees pay 150% of their income in taxes.

Between the billions in subsidies for select companies that might fail PLUS the billions in infrastructure needed to lure anyone International to a place one hour from Toronto (Horrors! Will there be bears?!), I'm sure there'll be tons of cash left over for projects in Ottawa. Oh, and those other places that are even FURTHER than an hour from Toronto.
     
     
  #1423  
Old Posted Aug 13, 2014, 2:29 PM
eternallyme eternallyme is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,243
Quote:
Originally Posted by S-Man View Post
Will those be another one of those high-tech companies Wynne is subsidizing to the tune of hundreds of thousands of dollars per employee?

Hope the company sticks around for 30 years and their employees pay 150% of their income in taxes.

Between the billions in subsidies for select companies that might fail PLUS the billions in infrastructure needed to lure anyone International to a place one hour from Toronto (Horrors! Will there be bears?!), I'm sure there'll be tons of cash left over for projects in Ottawa. Oh, and those other places that are even FURTHER than an hour from Toronto.
Yeah like in northern Ontario, where it is impractical to have any form of public transit other than city bus systems. Roads and air are lifelines there.

Back on topic, yeah I think, especially for Orleans, the LRT will be the win or lose issue in the federal election as well. With the federal budget expected to be in surplus, there might be an incentive for Galipeau (and Harper).
     
     
  #1424  
Old Posted Aug 13, 2014, 3:33 PM
hwy418 hwy418 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 410
^^^
Noticed Ottawa-Orleans MPP Marie-France Lalonde (second from the left) took part in the tour as shown in the pic below...

     
     
  #1425  
Old Posted Aug 13, 2014, 3:57 PM
S-Man S-Man is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,639
Quote:
Noticed Ottawa-Orleans MPP Marie-France Lalonde (second from the left) took part in the tour as shown in the pic below...
Clearly you're not used to Ottawa-area infrastructure announcements. I'm surprised the MPP from Cornwall and Rockland didn't show up, too.
     
     
  #1426  
Old Posted Aug 13, 2014, 4:41 PM
hwy418 hwy418 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 410
Quote:
Originally Posted by S-Man View Post
Clearly you're not used to Ottawa-area infrastructure announcements. I'm surprised the MPP from Cornwall and Rockland didn't show up, too.
Yes I am - these infrastructure announcements are a direct result of my line of work. Just stating the obvious. M.-F. Lalonde is my MPP and I like the fact she took the time to attend the tour. Too bad Bob Chiarelli, John Fraser, and Yasir Naqvi didn't.
     
     
  #1427  
Old Posted Aug 13, 2014, 5:03 PM
MalcolmTucker MalcolmTucker is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 11,615
Ministers are busy. I don't think it shows a lack of commitment or anything.
     
     
  #1428  
Old Posted Aug 13, 2014, 7:43 PM
Horus's Avatar
Horus Horus is offline
I ask because I Gatineau
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Aylmer (by way of GTA)
Posts: 1,214
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikeed View Post
The key to that HSR project is that it connects the tech. hub of Kitchener-Waterloo to the global gateway that is the GTA- making it much more attractive for Ontario to court Google/FB to build campuses in Waterloo if it's only 60 mins from Pearson.
The HSR proposal still sounds like nothing more than a pipe dream.
It seemed to be more of an announcement to try to swing votes in the close K-W ridings rather than a practical transportation plan. It would appeal most to the frustrated Waterloo Region commuter more than anything else. I'm not sure how much interest it would generate for commuting from Toronto to the Tech Hub in K-W. 2-way GO service would probably satisfy that demand.

I would expect it would be quite difficult and expensive to upgrade the current Georgetown GO / Kitchener VIA line to HSR standards, particularly through the towns en route (Georgetown, Acton, Guelph, Breslau, Kitchener, Baden, New Hamburg, Stratford).

This intersection in Baden is terrifying enough with VIA and freight trains rolling though at 60km/h+.
http://bit.ly/1kC0j1g
     
     
  #1429  
Old Posted Aug 13, 2014, 9:27 PM
1overcosc's Avatar
1overcosc 1overcosc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 12,377
It's uncertain if the HSR project is even alive at this point. It was very much Glen Murray's pet project, and now that he's no longer Minister of Transportation (good riddance btw. Yes he was an urbanite and he was very knowledgeable but was way too much of a loose cannon) the plan may be dropped. Especially because two-way all day GO service to Kitchener is already happening, and as you said, that provides most of the benefit anyway.

Yes, there would be massive infrastructure upgrades required to allow the track to reach HSR standards... but most of those upgrades are required for 2WAD GO anyway. The HSR project itself has very little capital spending between Kitchener and Toronto (and none at all between downtown Toronto & Pearson Airport)... most of the cost was building a brand new greenfield route from Kitchener to London.

Last edited by 1overcosc; Aug 13, 2014 at 10:00 PM.
     
     
  #1430  
Old Posted Aug 13, 2014, 9:28 PM
1overcosc's Avatar
1overcosc 1overcosc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 12,377
Quote:
Originally Posted by S-Man View Post
Clearly you're not used to Ottawa-area infrastructure announcements. I'm surprised the MPP from Cornwall and Rockland didn't show up, too.
The MPP from Cornwall is a PC. Why would he show up? That would just be awkward.
     
     
  #1431  
Old Posted Aug 13, 2014, 11:30 PM
acottawa acottawa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 18,881
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1overcosc View Post

Yes, there would be massive infrastructure upgrades required to allow the track to reach HSR standards... but most of those upgrades are required for 2WAD GO anyway. The HSR project itself has very little capital spending between Kitchener and Toronto (and none at all between downtown Toronto & Pearson Airport)... most of the cost was building a brand new greenfield route from Kitchener to London.
What are you basing that on?

The 2009 environmental assessment identifies a number of improvements necessary for two-way all day service
http://www.gotransit.com/public/en/docs/ea/georgetown-kitchener/Rail_Expansion_ESR.pdf

These include adding a 3rd track on sections shared with the CN mainline, adding a 2nd track on most of the rest of the line, adding signals, straitening out a curve, replacing a few junctions, etc. The report identifies the specific objective of increasing the maximum speed to 80mph (128 kph).

80mph is below the existing maximum operating speed of GO locamotives of 93 mph (http://www.gotransit.com/public/en/docs/publications/quickfacts/Quick_Facts_GO_Trains_EN.pdf) so there is no need for new rolling stock and express trains from KW can share track with other go services and VIA trains.

I guess it depends what one's definition of "high speed" is, but wikipedia identifies a number of sources that set a 200kph minimum. If that's what the premier means by "high speed" then a whole new set of upgrades are necessary, including new rolling stock (such as a Bombardier Jettrain), additional grade separation, additional safety features and probably a lot of new track (so these new trains can bypass slower moving GO, VIA and UPExpress trains).
     
     
  #1432  
Old Posted Aug 13, 2014, 11:48 PM
1overcosc's Avatar
1overcosc 1overcosc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 12,377
Quote:
Originally Posted by acottawa View Post
What are you basing that on?

The 2009 environmental assessment identifies a number of improvements necessary for two-way all day service
http://www.gotransit.com/public/en/docs/ea/georgetown-kitchener/Rail_Expansion_ESR.pdf

These include adding a 3rd track on sections shared with the CN mainline, adding a 2nd track on most of the rest of the line, adding signals, straitening out a curve, replacing a few junctions, etc. The report identifies the specific objective of increasing the maximum speed to 80mph (128 kph).

80mph is below the existing maximum operating speed of GO locamotives of 93 mph (http://www.gotransit.com/public/en/docs/publications/quickfacts/Quick_Facts_GO_Trains_EN.pdf) so there is no need for new rolling stock and express trains from KW can share track with other go services and VIA trains.

I guess it depends what one's definition of "high speed" is, but wikipedia identifies a number of sources that set a 200kph minimum. If that's what the premier means by "high speed" then a whole new set of upgrades are necessary, including new rolling stock (such as a Bombardier Jettrain), additional grade separation, additional safety features and probably a lot of new track (so these new trains can bypass slower moving GO, VIA and UPExpress trains).
I'm basing it on all the speculation I've read about on UT. People have made some pretty solid analyses of it.

It won't really be true high speed for most of the route. They have some sample travel times, and at UT people calculated that means that 320km/h will be reached only between Kitchener and London, the speed east of Kitchener is more like 150-200. So not really true HSR for most of the trip.

The bulk of HSR costs come from grade seperation requirements, electrification, and corridor acquisition. All of the first two and most of the third would be done to Kitchener as part of RER. Keep in mind that we've moved beyond simply having 2 way all day GO, we're now talking about metro-like electric high-frequency service that is a lot fancier.

At least that's what I've heard. Toronto transit is complicated. Head over to UT for a more complete story.
     
     
  #1433  
Old Posted Aug 14, 2014, 2:17 AM
citydwlr citydwlr is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 734
This isn't an Ottawa-based article, but I think it still applies nonetheless:

Improve LRT stations by adding retail services, says Edmonton engineer (via CBC)

Quote:
...

Matt Brassard is an environmental engineer with Urban Systems Ltd. He says LRT stations could be made more neighbourhood-friendly by adding features like grocery stores, coffee shops and yoga studios, which could also help increase ridership while integrating with the surrounding community.

“Just imagine a station where the biggest challenge is actually finding it,” Brassard said. “There’s so many things happening around it – there’s large amounts of retail, there’s residential towers vertically above the station and employment nodes. Just an amazing opportunity that we have in front of us.”

Brassard said cities like Vancouver have had success building developments right next to transit stations in order to take advantage of commuter traffic.

“Right on the platform, you walk out of the train you take 15 steps and you walk through the grocery store doors to pick up your dinner for the evening,” Brassard said.

...
     
     
  #1434  
Old Posted Aug 14, 2014, 3:07 AM
1overcosc's Avatar
1overcosc 1overcosc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 12,377
Last I heard the city is making allowances for retail at some of the stations. Anyone know more about this?
     
     
  #1435  
Old Posted Aug 14, 2014, 4:32 AM
PokerPukka's Avatar
PokerPukka PokerPukka is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by S-Man View Post
Oh, I'd also like to add....

HIGH SPEED RAIL TO LONDON??!!

http://www.smartplanet.com/blog/bulletin/new-york-to-london-in-an-hour-by-train/
- perhaps we could ask them to include a stop in Ottawa
     
     
  #1436  
Old Posted Aug 14, 2014, 1:42 PM
1overcosc's Avatar
1overcosc 1overcosc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 12,377
If a project like that is even feasible, building something like that to connect all of Canada's cities would be a godsend to our country.
     
     
  #1437  
Old Posted Aug 14, 2014, 2:01 PM
Kitchissippi's Avatar
Kitchissippi Kitchissippi is offline
Busy Beaver
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 4,691
Pffft. They can't even get California HSR going, and that's just from SF to LA. Hollywood has had better luck, though, well sort of

     
     
  #1438  
Old Posted Aug 14, 2014, 3:12 PM
MalcolmTucker MalcolmTucker is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 11,615
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1overcosc View Post
Last I heard the city is making allowances for retail at some of the stations. Anyone know more about this?
Hopefully the city didn't spend much more for the space. The retail space in Calgary and Edmonton has sat empty since at least the late 90s. A tiny space in one station will now have a coffee shop.

Not a success.
     
     
  #1439  
Old Posted Aug 14, 2014, 4:18 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 29,035
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1overcosc View Post
Last I heard the city is making allowances for retail at some of the stations. Anyone know more about this?
If you click on the stations under and you check the "Other station features" list (below station rendering and description) you can see weather or not the station will have built in retail.

Tunney's, uOttawa, Hurdman and Tremblay are the ones with retail. Lyon, Parliament, Rideau and St-Laurent are directly connected to retail buildings so it's not necessary IMO.
     
     
  #1440  
Old Posted Aug 14, 2014, 5:19 PM
S-Man S-Man is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,639
Quote:
The MPP from Cornwall is a PC. Why would he show up? That would just be awkward.
Whoopsies, never mind then. The point I was making was that almost anyone will show up at 'good news' announcements if there's an off-chance that some residue of the glowing spotlight will rub off on them.

Carry on, all! And high-speed rail ain't happening. It just is not.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Transportation
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:58 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.