HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Southwest


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #6161  
Old Posted Aug 7, 2014, 3:34 AM
ct424 ct424 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 9
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jjs5056 View Post
I'd prefer it go in the Warehouse District than into Colliers. There are already a few pregame options north of Jackson and while BWW wouldn't necessarily die on non-game days, I'd rather Colliers complement CityScape through shopping and for any new restaurants in the area to be more of the 'everyday kind' - aka more Arrogant Butcher and Hard Rock. I think an Aveda Salon and an Art Gallery have opened in Colliers, which seem like a good start, although any retail is going to struggle in a 2-story inward-facing project supported by only 1 office building at the opposite end.

I suppose for spaces like Stoudemire's that are equipped for restaurant use, it would be wasteful to convert, so I agree that if anywhere, that's the best space.

It just seems like CityScape has put the number of restaurants close to capacity, whereas the Warehouse District desperately needs another anchor besides Cooperstown and a well-known chain might be the perfect start for more independent establishments to then open near an already-known area.

Spaces like:
- Jackson's on 3rd/Jackson (if currently vacant- I can't tell if it is permanently reopened again or not)
- Legends Bar/Coach Willie's at UPRR/3rd
- Brickhouse at 1st Ave/Jackson

If in the business of renovation (they mentioned 'construction'):
- Renovate and expand the St James Hotel
- Renovate and occupy a portion of the multiple retail buildings adjacent to Dudley Ventures
- Renovate the former Foundry on 1st St/UPRR; might be too large of a space, though?
Just to follow-up on the Jackson's on 3rd location, Jackson's has been demolished in the last few weeks, or at least the front part that used to be the outdoor space. Did some searching on the demolition permits and it looks like the new owner of the lot/building is Phoenix Center for Dentistry and some of the permits discuss the building of a training center there. If that's the case, it's not exactly a entertainment district usage of that space, but I guess it's better than an abandoned bar.
     
     
  #6162  
Old Posted Aug 7, 2014, 3:41 AM
poconoboy61 poconoboy61 is offline
skyscrapers!
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 237
Quote:
Originally Posted by HooverDam View Post
Oh good heavens this conversation is getting pedantic.

Here's things we can all agree on:

*7 or 8 months out of the year the weather in Phoenix is perfect.
*Encanto Park is a historic, lovely park.
*Encanto Park ISN'T what it used to be, there's far less trees, flowers, and of course the band shell is gone.
* Encanto Park is probably the closest thing Phoenix has to a Central Park, but is in need of a major facelift to be a truly world class park. Right now its basically a nice neighborhood park with some golf courses.
I think snowbird season is an accurate gauge of the length of our supposed "perfect" weather. Snowbird season is definitely not 7-8 months.

We can both agree that there are fewer trees and flowers, all which make the place less inviting. No matter what month of the year here, most people are only going to be comfortable for so long in direct sunlight.

Encanto will never be a world class park. It could be covered edge to edge in ficus or eucalyptus and it would still be empty. People in Phoenix do not do parks like other major cities. Go to Washington, Cheesman, or City Park in Denver any weekend and see what a real park city is like. Phoenix will never achieve that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by soleri View Post
Having lived in Denver, I can tell you there's a huge difference between it and a Midwestern city. Denver is usually sunny. It's temperatures vary widely but it's never a six month slog of uninterrupted one thing or another. Yes, there are cold days in the winter. Do they last a long spell? No. Denver's climate is one of its attractions. Denver is also outdoorsy. Colorado has the nation's lowest obesity rate for a reason. If it were always cold, that would definitely be different.
Agreed.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Edifice View Post
While I agree that Denver is not Chicago or Minneapolis, it is still a very cold and long winter. I lived in Denver for 15 years, so I am not a neophyte on this subject. My sons still live there and I am up there quite a bit.

I was born in Arizona, so it was a real challenge for me to try and adapt to the weather (I never did). I saw it snow as early as September 10 and as late as June 5. In 2008, there were 89 days in a row with measurable snow on the ground, that is, it never disappeared for almost 3 months.

I went jogging on Christmas day in 1987 and it was minus 13 degrees. For those that claim that it is mostly sunny, well that's because most of the sunny days have at least some time when it's cloudy, overcast, or raining/snowing.

I absolutely HATED shoveling snow in my driveway and the sidewalk in front of my house. It faced north and I had a virtual glacier in front of my house every winter. Denver weather is great in the summer, and yes, there are some beautiful days in the spring and fall, but overall, I would never trade what we have here in PHX for DEN.
Denver's snow chances last a long part of the year, but to imply that winter is constant between September and April is a lie. The vast majority of days are between 40-60, interspersed with occasional brutal arctic outbreaks. Parks can be comfortably utilized the majority of weekends in Denver, even in the "dead" of winter.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Buckeye Native 001 View Post
Have any of you guys been to Flagstaff or Prescott for any length of time in the winter? Denver's climate is very similar to that.

Hell, I grew up in Ohio and as cold as Flagstaff gets in the Winter, at least its not constantly gray from late October to late March/early April like in the Midwest (as soleri has already alluded to).

As for Phoenix, can we all agree that nothing ever good comes from mentioning it anytime the city is brought up in City Discussions? I know I'm guilty of bashing it in the past, but living elsewhere in Arizona has given me a greater appreciation for the giant metropolis to the south (or as we call it in Coconino County, "the Great State of Maricopa" ) over the past several years.
Denver's climate is not similar to Flagstaff or Prescott. Flagstaff is colder every month of the year. Prescott has nowhere near the volatility that Denver's weather has.

Phoenix can't compare to other cities, but there seems to be a contingent of people who constantly bitch and moan when they come back from a trip to San Diego or Denver about what Phoenix is lacking. Phoenix lacks these things for a reason. It is a suburban city that will never be anything but. We have very few traditional urban neighborhoods and, frankly, it's too late to build our way out of the mistakes we made in the past. What's done is done.
     
     
  #6163  
Old Posted Aug 7, 2014, 10:53 AM
HX_Guy HX_Guy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,103
Quote:
Originally Posted by azsunsurfer View Post
There is not enough on-street parking in the vicinity to support all the uses nearby (including that 6 story multi-tenant building breaking ground this fall). It's a necessary evil. At least it looks good and has 1st floor uses. Welcome to reality, it's nice to meet you.
Where are you guys seeing these first floor uses? Looks like they put up some glass and tables/chairs but that's it...the glass is transparent and you can see there is nothing but cars on the other side. The tables make it seem like there is retail space there but I don't think that's the case.
     
     
  #6164  
Old Posted Aug 7, 2014, 12:25 PM
Jjs5056 Jjs5056 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by HX_Guy View Post
Where are you guys seeing these first floor uses? Looks like they put up some glass and tables/chairs but that's it...the glass is transparent and you can see there is nothing but cars on the other side. The tables make it seem like there is retail space there but I don't think that's the case.
This parking structure was required to be mixed use. When construction was announced a year or so ago (it was supposed to start with the Cancer Center), all of the articles dropped any mention of retail or other uses. So, I emailed the Project Manager directly to ask, and he confirmed that our stifling laws were indeed forcing his company into a design corner by requiring additional uses that would eat up parking space, increase the rates they could rent the spaces to companies for, and the structure would never be able to be built.

He asked that I contact my rep regarding the policies of Urban Form before it was too late, the project died, and a new developer built an even worse garage on a different parcel. LOL

So, on the positive side:
1) They've designed the upper floors to reflect Urban Form
2) There is SOME secondary use along the ground level of 5th Street; the use requirement is vague, and while yes - the tables make me want to say they've gone with retail - it could just as easily be an outdoor plaza. And, the more I look at it, the more I think they got away with just that... everyone at a table appears to be studying or on a phone/laptop, making it seem like an outdoor working area, with the glass panels (which I just noticed are diagonal panels) counting as 'public art' toward making this mixed use.

^ As I told the PM, I can't understand how a national development company couldn't lease ground level space in the middle of 2 large campuses, a Cancer Center, Holiday Inn and a nationally-renowned art district. The students in that area have little in the way of food options, the Cancer Center visitors could certainly use a place to relax, and all of the above could use a Walgreens (jobs for the med school, supplies and meds for ASU students/Skyline+McKinley Apts), cards and gifts for Cancer Center visitors...).
Fingers crossed - retail would be the first design element of the entire Medical Campus that attempted to integrate into the greater City, and hopefully, whatever went there, would be something that makes sense for the area and could be open and used by a large number of people. I'll be upset if this is being built as a single-use structure on City land with glass panels and tables giving it a mixed use designation.

Parking Downtown
As far as the parking debate itself, studies have continually shown that downtown is overparked. With that knowledge, and the goal of creating an energetic, thriving city, it would make sense that the City push for sharing garages, leasing space in garages that are a bit of a walk, incentivizing transit use, etc. to get employees to not just ride an elevator to/from their car each day, and instead, walk the streets and maybe pick up a bagel or coffee; or, try out a new happy hour spot, and so on. This still gives suburbanites their spot, while training them to become more and more open to urban ideals.

The fact that every development comes with a garage in tandem is horrible for the built environment. No matter how well it is designed, it's taking up valuable real estate that should be used on projects that connect the dots, not cut them in half. Walk down almost any street, and the energy is sucked out of the air every time a garage fronts the road. Great if ground level uses are included, but we need density and crave an active streetscape; cars don't leave their spots during the day to engage in the city like office workers, residents, or students do.

And, while this garage will be one of the least offensive given its design, location and potential inclusion of ground level uses, a master-planned development in an urban center should never PLAN for above-ground parking taking up an entire block. Planning gives you the advantage of taking time to make the right choices; how many more buildings are planned for this campus? Why the heck couldn't this parking be absorbed through underground parking beneath those? At least TGEN is to its south and additional structures will be built and cover it on the east side.

Arizona Center Garbage
The location of this garage and the potential for retail on the ground level makes the design of the Arizona Center more frustrating than ever. As much as I'd want the theater torn down and rebuilt, and some of the stores turned inside out to front 3rd St, if that horrible massive garage was just built underground for a future 3rd tower (hotel or residential?), and the east side designed to be inviting, this wouldn't even be a discussion. But, instead of being 1 piece in the connection between all those entities (Apartment Residents, ASU campus, Medical Campus, Holiday Inn, Cancer Center, Evans Churchill...), it's a huge barrier that makes surrounding developments completely cut-off.

Last edited by Jjs5056; Aug 7, 2014 at 1:13 PM.
     
     
  #6165  
Old Posted Aug 7, 2014, 12:56 PM
Jjs5056 Jjs5056 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by ct424 View Post
Just to follow-up on the Jackson's on 3rd location, Jackson's has been demolished in the last few weeks, or at least the front part that used to be the outdoor space. Did some searching on the demolition permits and it looks like the new owner of the lot/building is Phoenix Center for Dentistry and some of the permits discuss the building of a training center there. If that's the case, it's not exactly a entertainment district usage of that space, but I guess it's better than an abandoned bar.
Oy vey! That's horrible news. Thanks for looking up the permits, but I totally disagree - an abandoned Jackson's is infinitely more desirable in the longterm.

1) There will never be a warehouse entertainment district; entertainment uses only have a chance at being successful along Jackson due to the proximity to the stadium and arena, making the destinations walkable and safe.

An abandoned Jackson's was basically ready to go as a sports bar once someone had the capital and desire - one of the few warehouses already restored and remodeled to house such an establishment. As those options dwindle, the chance of even having one street of converted warehouses to hang out in pre/post-game or on weekends seems less likely and reliant on someone who plans on purchasing and remodeling.

2) Bringing jobs to the district is not a bad idea. In fact, it's great. Dental assistant and dental hygienist jobs are expected to increase exponentially in the next 20 years, and these are the types of jobs that might be attainable for the population of the Parks neighborhoods. But, this kind of use is best suited for Lincoln, Grant, preferably outside 3rd-3rd where new construction could aid in making those areas nicer and more enticing to other development.

Offices, schools, etc. as the sole occupant of a historic structure is a complete waste, especially along Jackson. Jackson should be a street that doesn't turn its lights off until 2am. These uses just aren't compatible, and the more of them that take over existing warehouses, the earlier the area will get dark, and the less safe the area will seem. Walking from Chase on 3rd and Jefferson, you wouldn't make it to an open business until Cooperstown on 1st/Jackson. For those who don't know the area, that's a long walk in an area that still carries a 'sketchy' reputation.

3) The loss of a restored warehouse is never a good thing. We have a small inventory to begin with, and wrecking one for a building that could've gone up on any empty lot in any location is a real shame.
     
     
  #6166  
Old Posted Aug 9, 2014, 12:55 PM
Phxguy Phxguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Phoenix, Az
Posts: 1,188
Finally...some positive development news happening in a b-e-a-uitful historic building downtown. Will be a very interesting venue, if it does happen of course, and I hope they could use the bell tower for a cool vantage point as they do with the cathedrals in Europe, although there isn't much to see in the surrounding area.

http://kjzz.org/content/40795/did-you-know-historic-church-under-renovation-2015
     
     
  #6167  
Old Posted Aug 9, 2014, 2:26 PM
KevininPhx KevininPhx is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 149
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phxguy View Post
Finally...some positive development news happening in a b-e-a-uitful historic building downtown. Will be a very interesting venue, if it does happen of course, and I hope they could use the bell tower for a cool vantage point as they do with the cathedrals in Europe, although there isn't much to see in the surrounding area.

http://kjzz.org/content/40795/did-you-know-historic-church-under-renovation-2015
Fascinating. But the article doesn't really say what it's going to be used for, so I'm a little confused. Still, nice.
     
     
  #6168  
Old Posted Aug 10, 2014, 1:21 AM
Jjs5056 Jjs5056 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,724
Sounds like it's mainly going to be used as a space for the community similar to the mill on Mill Ave - a garden and stage for performances, etc. The woman quoted owns the adjacent apartments, so I wouldn't expect any programming that at night or that will draw a young crowd to the venue, unfortunately. With all of the offers reportedly given to purchase the building over the years, it'll be sad to see it used in such a way as it could be so much more and a real game-changer in an area that has a lot of historic building stock just waiting to be restored. A rotating restaurant venue or 1-2 screen indie theater would be a great addition, and the attachment to the west might be large enough for several lofts?

Oh well, glad it's being restored, not knocked down, and will see some life, even if only by residents of the Abbey.

In other news,
1) Why were the trees surrounding 215 McKinley torn down?
2) An ASU class examined the Warehouse District and spoke with a ton of influential people; the end result is the following document which outlines concrete recommendations with real budgets, timeline and funding sources in an attempt to move from 'planning' to 'acting.' This District has been the source of planning efforts for decades, so I applaud the effort, but disagree with almost the entire 100+ page report.

http://www.transpolisglobal.com/phx_whd_activ_plan_files/WD-FOR-WD-072614.pdf

Summary
A. From someone who loves words, the document was unnecessarily long with little substance. In the end, there were very few recommendations, and I would have preferred that they include quotes of support for each to give a sense of how realistic each is, instead of so much verbiage on the history of the area.
B. Several of their recommendations are listed as "ongoing" within the timeline, yet could never be supported given the lack of residents nearby at the moment, such as adding community gardens. Residential density should be the #1 priority, and there were no recommendations on buildings or lots that could be utilized.
C. The locations for many of the recommendations were terrible when put into context; of course "incubators" were a recommendation, but not only is this kind of space unnecessary - there is already one at 502 2nd Ave and WebPT is planning one for their new warehouse -, the 2 places they chose as possibilities have much greater potential for other uses: 1st/Jackson warehouse (can support 3 additional levels on top of the current 4, plus has land surrounding it for more buildings- aka, the perfect spot for a housing development with ground level retail attracting those at USAC and CityScape); 2nd and Buchanan Tommyknockers (a ready-to-go brewery should be used as just that - breweries have been identified as a tourism attraction we need, and the area desperately needs an authentic establishment). Additionally, they chose lots on Central and 1st Ave that aren't visible by car due to the tunnels - the warehouse district needs 100% visibility from cars and pedestrians to thrive.
D. There was much talk about not gentrifying the area and not replicating buildings like The Summit; this is a terrible planning mistake. Of course, keeping the area occupied with affordable options is important, but trying to add a diverse retail mix is dependent on a residential base with a high disposable income. Young professionals living in high rises within the warehouse district core would a great thing: disposable incomes, eyes on the street, impression of safety and a clean/inviting area, density within a small area, etc. Having these developments built directly adjacent to the sports venues serves an important market and benefits the district as a whole; the focus should be on the design of such buildings - all buildings for that matter - making sure they all interact with each other and the street to keep it lively.
E. The Jackson Street Entertainment District was essentially brushed off, considered 'done' or 'ongoing.' This is far from the truth, given that the only entertainment establishments on Jackson are The Icehouse and Cooperstown. One of the most important things for making the district work is making sure Jackson becomes the gateway it should be by establishing attractions that are unique and frequented from morning to late night. Also, an entire section was dedicated to connectivity without any mention of the 2 sports garages and 2 jails that front Jackson and create massive dead zones in the area. Those need to be addressed ASAP.
F. I was happy to see the restoration of Union Station listed; they recommended a phased approach to allow Spring to stay in the meantime as parts of the station were reverted and reopened: first, a museum, then a restaurant, then a full buy-out and reintroduction of Amtrak service. But, they talked about it in a complete vacuum. What about its surroundings? What about the adjacent Chambers warehouse filled with telecom business? The county buildings and jails that separate it from the rest of the district? The blight to the south? Restoring it is great, but making it an island of crap is poor planning.
G. They didn't seem to understand the significance of the GW Carver Museum, focusing only on the galleries there for artists to use. The most important thing should be expanding the hours, so that people like these students understand that the importance of such a place is to tell the story of early Phoenix when segregated development forced the black and latino populations such of the tracks. That's an important story that needs to be told every day, not by appointment only, and there should be a great effort to bring the in-planning Latino Center nearby with its similar past.

Other than that, I loved one of the ideas which was to line the railroad tracks with actual cars turned into small cafes, offices, etc. I had never seen that before and think it's a perfect and affordable way to get retail to the center of the district. On that note, I wish they had discussed the option of prefab/modular housing for affordable living on some of the larger lots.
     
     
  #6169  
Old Posted Aug 10, 2014, 1:57 AM
dtnphx dtnphx is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,057
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phxguy View Post
Finally...some positive development news happening in a b-e-a-uitful historic building downtown. Will be a very interesting venue, if it does happen of course, and I hope they could use the bell tower for a cool vantage point as they do with the cathedrals in Europe, although there isn't much to see in the surrounding area.

http://kjzz.org/content/40795/did-you-know-historic-church-under-renovation-2015
A very cool fact is that former Phoenix Mayor Terry Goddard actually worked to help keep this building from further decay. About 15-20 years ago, he was responsible for some of the window and door replacements and structural help to keep this building viable so it could be protected. Not sure which group he worked with to secure the building, but this, among other things is why I respect him so much. Plus...he's running for Arizona Attorney General, too!
     
     
  #6170  
Old Posted Aug 10, 2014, 3:49 AM
exit2lef exit2lef is online now
reasonably smart guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 3,355
Quote:
Originally Posted by dtnphx View Post
A very cool fact is that former Phoenix Mayor Terry Goddard actually worked to help keep this building from further decay. About 15-20 years ago, he was responsible for some of the window and door replacements and structural help to keep this building viable so it could be protected. Not sure which group he worked with to secure the building, but this, among other things is why I respect him so much. Plus...he's running for Arizona Attorney General, too!
Goddard has previously served as Attorney General, but this time he's running for Secretary of State.
     
     
  #6171  
Old Posted Aug 10, 2014, 5:46 PM
HooverDam's Avatar
HooverDam HooverDam is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Country Club Park, Greater Coronado, Midtown, Phoenix, Az
Posts: 4,610
Quote:
Originally Posted by KevininPhx View Post
Fascinating. But the article doesn't really say what it's going to be used for, so I'm a little confused. Still, nice.
My understanding is it will be a venue. Usable for plays, concerts, etc. Without a primary tenant though it may be empty a lot of the time. If they made it lush inside with lots of greenery growing up the walls and stuff, I think it could be a pretty rad wedding venue.
     
     
  #6172  
Old Posted Aug 10, 2014, 5:56 PM
ASUSunDevil ASUSunDevil is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 950
Eddie Jones is the architect for the Monroe Street Abbey rehab - pretty good chance it will turn out awesome.

http://jonesstudioinc.com/public/39/index.htm
     
     
  #6173  
Old Posted Aug 11, 2014, 10:21 AM
Jjs5056 Jjs5056 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,724
Isn't Jones responsible for the Law School monstrosity? =/ Oh well - that's good news, as I know he is a respected local designer and means that they're investing in a great finished product. The drawings aren't particularly useful... I hope they don't plan on altering the exterior to that degree, and all I can see is that they're creating an interior garden... no stage or open area for events, so there goes that idea. There might a cafe involved, but I can't make out the word well enough.

As for Goddard, I appreciate all he has done for downtown and that he helped preserve the building, but he was one of the stakeholders who continually turned down offers to turn the building into a club, music venue, etc. over the years while it just sat vacant.

Last edited by Jjs5056; Aug 11, 2014 at 10:32 AM.
     
     
  #6174  
Old Posted Aug 11, 2014, 4:07 PM
Obadno Obadno is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,902
New Apartment building

New apartment complex next to Roosevelt Point:

http://azbex.com/live-work-apartments-in-the-mix-for-downtown-phoenix/

Looks about 5 or 6 stories tall. I think its great for downtown to focus more on these sized developments. Once the polulation grows the buildings will get taller.
     
     
  #6175  
Old Posted Aug 11, 2014, 4:28 PM
dtnphx dtnphx is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,057
Quote:
Originally Posted by exit2lef View Post
Goddard has previously served as Attorney General, but this time he's running for Secretary of State.
I'm dyslexic.
     
     
  #6176  
Old Posted Aug 11, 2014, 5:03 PM
PHXFlyer11 PHXFlyer11 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,441
Quote:
Originally Posted by Obadno View Post
New apartment complex next to Roosevelt Point:

http://azbex.com/live-work-apartments-in-the-mix-for-downtown-phoenix/

Looks about 5 or 6 stories tall. I think its great for downtown to focus more on these sized developments. Once the polulation grows the buildings will get taller.
I agree, the more population we can get down there, the more retail we will get! Look at Tempe, it finally reached a tipping point and the growth has just accelerated exponentially.

Phoenix has a long way to go, but projects like these help.

Anyone heard anything on Union or the Transit Center projects? It is just ridiculous to me that Phoenix keeps awarding these RFPs to companies that do nothing when they win! The winner for the Barrister building has yet to be announced, correct?
     
     
  #6177  
Old Posted Aug 11, 2014, 5:12 PM
crwhiteinaz crwhiteinaz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Phoenix Biltmore ARea
Posts: 58
Studio Meng Strazzara (referenced in http://azbex.com/live-work-apartments-in-the-mix-for-downtown-phoenix/) seems to be a solid design firm. The infill work they are doing in Seattle is pretty impressive. Its nice to have an outside group working on this that understands the solid winning components of urban design and mixed use infill.
     
     
  #6178  
Old Posted Aug 11, 2014, 6:38 PM
HooverDam's Avatar
HooverDam HooverDam is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Country Club Park, Greater Coronado, Midtown, Phoenix, Az
Posts: 4,610
Quote:
Originally Posted by Obadno View Post
New apartment complex next to Roosevelt Point:

http://azbex.com/live-work-apartments-in-the-mix-for-downtown-phoenix/

Looks about 5 or 6 stories tall. I think its great for downtown to focus more on these sized developments. Once the polulation grows the buildings will get taller.
This is a good project, I hope it happens. Its tearing down a nice block of single story commercial that had some cool and funky uses. I'd be disappointed if those get knocked down, and then this project never materializes like so often happens.
     
     
  #6179  
Old Posted Aug 12, 2014, 5:38 PM
kingofleos's Avatar
kingofleos kingofleos is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Tempe
Posts: 142
Sorry everyone, this may have been posted already, but if you look at this article please have a chuckle with me. AZ Central's current headline:

10 Tallest Buildings in Phoenix

http://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/phoenix/2014/08/08/phoenix-tallest-buildings/13802083/

And all this to celebrate "Skyscraper Appreciation Day". Yeah, show me a skyscraper and I'll appreciate it!

What a joke.
     
     
  #6180  
Old Posted Aug 12, 2014, 6:55 PM
Obadno Obadno is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,902
Quote:
Originally Posted by kingofleos View Post
Sorry everyone, this may have been posted already, but if you look at this article please have a chuckle with me. AZ Central's current headline:

10 Tallest Buildings in Phoenix

http://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/phoenix/2014/08/08/phoenix-tallest-buildings/13802083/

And all this to celebrate "Skyscraper Appreciation Day". Yeah, show me a skyscraper and I'll appreciate it!

What a joke.
Whats with everyones boners for skyscrapers???

Id rather downtown have no buildings over 4 floors if the downtown was a live an populated like Mill or Downtown Scottsdale. Skyscrapers dont do anything besides look nice on a postcard.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Southwest
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:43 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.